Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Building a Heat-Safe South Florida for Cancer Survivors and Patients

News

man in yellow and black crew neck shirt raising his right hand
man in yellow and black crew neck shirt raising his right hand

Temperatures in South Florida have been rising, leading to extreme heat and alarming heat advisories. On Aug. 13, 2026, the state experienced dangerous heat, with heat index values potentially climbing above 110 degrees.

Most Floridians take caution and stay inside if they can to escape the heat. For cancer patients and survivors, getting to that air-conditioned space can be another challenge.


A recent University of Miami study found that many cancer survivors experience exhaustion, brain fog, and social isolation during periods of extreme heat, often forcing them to remain indoors or rely on personal cooling strategies.

Researchers found an increased need for cooling and significant social withdrawal among the study participants.

The study raises a critical question: If staying home is the safest way for cancer survivors to avoid the heat, what happens when they must go elsewhere?

Neighborhood cooling centers offer part of the solution. Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami have already expanded their response to extreme heat by increasing the number of accessible cooling centers.

For the 2025 Heat Season, Miami-Dade added 11 cooling sites, including 10 Miami Park facilities and one at Camillus Health. The expansion brought the county's total to 64 cooling sites, many operating seven days a week with extended hours. The sites provide air-conditioned spaces where residents can escape the heat and cool down.

While cooling centers are impactful, reaching them can be difficult. Some South Florida cities lack nearby facilities. For cancer patients experiencing fatigue, mobility challenges, or treatment side effects, transportation is a major barrier—especially for those without personal vehicles.

Noel Neilsonsky, a 21-year-old cancer survivor, experienced this firsthand. "Sometimes our health gets in the way," Neilsonsky said.

In the summer of 2024, Neilsonsky underwent his first surgery. While recovering, the extreme heat made participating in everyday activities difficult.

His mobility was limited, requiring the use of a cane and crutches. "Some days the heat was unbearable," Neilsonsky mentioned. When college classes resumed, he had to miss lectures because the heat made him ill.

Even a short walk became exhausting. Neilsonsky remembers walking to a Crumbl Cookie location around 11 a.m. and becoming extremely nauseous and exhausted.

“Just doing a leisurely walk was just like a task for me,” Neilsonsky said.

Passing out from heat exhaustion after returning home became a frequent occurrence. However, he also experienced a potential model for improving accessibility.

During his time studying at Florida State University, the Office of Accessibility Services provided transportation accommodations, including a ventilated shuttle. That helped Neilsonsky get around campus while recovering.

Drawing from his experience on campus, Neilsonsky believes South Florida could benefit from expanding specialized transportation services for those vulnerable to heat-related illness.

“It's not like we just want to stay at home and do nothing,” Neilsonsky said. “We want to be out there. It's just sometimes our health gets in the way.”

Enhanced transportation could be a vital addition to current solutions. Brian Slomovitz, M.D., of Mount Sinai Medical Center, agreed that transportation is a primary concern.

"Maybe having [cooling centers] near the person that takes care of them, if not near the medical campus, would help," Slomovitz said. "Because really, just getting out of the house sometimes is a very time-consuming process."

A two-pronged approach could be effective for South Florida: increasing the number of neighborhood cooling centers and providing transportation for those unable to reach them independently.

Libraries, recreation centers, and community centers could serve as cooling locations closer to residents. Providing transportation for patients who are fatigued, have limited mobility, or live further away would also be beneficial.

South Florida is not alone in addressing accessibility. A study published by the National Library of Medicine in New York found that both location and transportation are vital for accessing cooling centers.

In rural communities, the average driving distance to a center was roughly 18 miles, making those residents more vulnerable to extreme heat.

A viable solution for South Florida does not necessarily require new construction; instead, existing community spaces could be converted into cooling centers located closer to vulnerable populations.

The success of these efforts depends on addressing key questions regarding the benefits for residents like cancer patients and survivors:

  • Are cooling centers located near the medically vulnerable communities?
  • How far do cancer patients and survivors have to travel to a cooling center?
  • Can they reach centers by public transportation?
  • Is transportation available for people who are not mobile?
  • How many people actually use the centers?
  • Do patients know the centers exist?

These questions can answer the measure of success of a cooling network of centers.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has noted that research measuring health outcomes for cooling centers is limited. Factors such as transportation, walking access, center density, public education, and offered services all impact their effectiveness.

Effective cooling centers help those who have experienced cancer stay safe within their communities rather than being confined to their homes.

The University of Miami study found that extreme heat forced some cancer survivors to spend more time at home and reduce their social activities.

Accessibility is crucial; cancer patients and survivors should not be trapped indoors. Nearby cooling centers provide safe shelter and the opportunity to remain connected to the community.

While specific research proving that cooling centers prevent heat-related illness among cancer patients is limited, the University of Miami study—though small, with 20 participants—underscores the need for further investigation into how heat interacts with cancer treatments.

Ongoing research is essential for developing effective solutions. As South Florida's heat intensifies, robust cooling networks and reliable transportation will provide a necessary safe haven for the medically vulnerable.

Kazon Allen is a broadcast journalism student at Florida A&M University, and is a member of the summer Fulcrum Fellowship.


Read More

Senators Criticize Trump Administration’s Demands to Access Health Data as a Condition for Lifesaving Aid
Roberto “Bear” Guerra/ProPublica. Source image: Getty Images

Senators Criticize Trump Administration’s Demands to Access Health Data as a Condition for Lifesaving Aid

What Happened: Citing reporting by ProPublica, eight Democratic U.S. senators have criticized the Trump administration’s demands to access the health data of millions of people as a condition of giving lifesaving aid to other countries. In a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the senators, including minority leader Chuck Schumer, said the U.S. demands were “unprecedented and at odds with U.S. policy concerning the data of American citizens.”

The inquiry into the administration’s approach to foreign health data referred to a ProPublica story published in June about agreements the U.S. struck with African countries — and the risks they posed to people there. Experts told ProPublica that the deals are vague and lack language used in most data-sharing agreements to adequately limit what information is collected and how it can be used. As a result, they said, there is an increased risk that individuals’ personal data could be exposed, misused or commercialized without their consent.

Keep Reading Show less
As Temperatures Rise and Federal Funding Falls, Drowning Risks Grow
a group of kids in a pool
Photo by Kevin Paes on Unsplash

As Temperatures Rise and Federal Funding Falls, Drowning Risks Grow

July 25 marked World Drowning Day. More than 4000 people die from unintentional drowning in the United States each year. This translates into an average of 11 drowning deaths per day. Children ages one to four are at greatest risk, making drowning the leading cause of death for that group and the second leading cause of death for children ages five to 14.

Two emerging trends could make those numbers worse: federal funding cuts that have weakened drowning prevention efforts and hotter summers that are driving more people to water to cool off. Together, these trends threaten to deepen long-standing disparities that already place Black, Indigenous, autistic, and low-income communities at greater risk.

Keep Reading Show less
FDA Sign at its headquarters in Washington DC. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA) is a federal agency of the USA.

The FDA’s changing drug approval policies raise concerns about political influence, scientific standards, drug safety, and the future of U.S. pharmaceutical regulation.

JHVEPhoto/Getty Images

FDA Turmoil: Political Interference Threatens Drug Safety Standards

Over the past three decades, drug development in the United States accelerated dramatically. Industry spending increased tenfold between the 1980s and 2019; the number of manufacturers grew; clinical trials became more sophisticated; and new technologies and precision medicines emerged. The Food and Drug Administration kept pace, building processes, standards, and a scientific culture that supported this rapid innovation. It offered pharmaceutical companies a predictable regulatory environment and a level playing field, producing substantial benefits for consumers and researchers alike.

In little more than a year, however, the Trump administration has upended many of these FDA norms. It has tied certain drug approvals to political considerations through a new, opaque program; imposed labeling changes without new scientific evidence; forced out experienced career scientists; replaced respected experts on advisory panels; and promoted unproven therapies. While some of these moves have drawn limited media attention, most have escaped public notice—even though they threaten national health standards and consumer safety. And legal guardrails may be too weak to prevent or limit their effects.

Keep Reading Show less
Gynecologist doing ultrasound of pregnant woman in hospital.

Rural hospital labor and delivery closures are creating maternity care deserts—and costing communities physicians, jobs, families, and economic investment.

Maskot/Getty Images

No Doctor, No Delivery, No Future

Today, less than half of rural hospitals in the U.S. still offer labor and delivery services, and since 2020, 139 of them have stopped delivering babies altogether. That's usually treated as public health statistic. It's also an economic one. Each closure doesn't just push expectant mothers into longer drives to the hospital, it pushes out physicians, jobs, young families, and the investment that follows them. So, what happens to a town after it loses its only labor and delivery unit?

The answer, it turns out, is a lot more than a longer drive to the hospital. More than a third of U.S. counties, 35.1 percent by the most recent national count, are now what researchers call maternity care deserts: places with no hospital or birth center offering obstetric care and no obstetric clinicians at all. Since the end of 2020, 139 rural hospitals have stopped delivering babies, and today less than half of rural hospitals nationwide still offer labor and delivery services.

Keep Reading Show less