Skip to content
Project 2025
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories
Two containers, one with a U.S. flag and another with Canada's flag.

Just the Facts: U.S.–Canada Tariff War Escalates As Trump Raises Stakes

Close up of U.S. Army and American flag patches on a uniform

Veterans Day Betrayal: ICE Detains U.S. Military Veterans Under Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

After ICE Raid, Wisconsin’s Dairy Labor Crisis Deepens

After ICE Raid, Wisconsin’s Dairy Labor Crisis Deepens

A person putting on an "I Voted" sticker.

The Voting Rights Act Is Under Attack in the South

People voting at booths.

Who Will Be the First American Candidate To Harness AI

Helping states comply with the Electoral Count Reform Act

Election Reformers Network details simple steps for states to comply with new federal law before the 2024 election.

News

Helping states comply with the Electoral Count Reform Act
Getty Images
The Fulcrum
By The FulcrumJun 30, 2023
The Fulcrum
The Fulcrum staff.
See More Writings by author

Confusing and ambiguous laws for critical phases of the presidential election played a big role in the near failure of America’s peaceful transfer of power after the 2020 elections. Republicans and Democrats in Congress took on the problem, passing critically important bipartisan legislation in December 2022. Now, it’s up to the states to complete this important work. Before the 2024 election, all states and Washington D.C. should assure their own laws and procedures comply with the Electoral Count Reform Act (ECRA).

To date only a handful of states have enacted ECRA compliance changes.

This week, Election Reformers Network (ERN) released a new report, “ Helping States Comply with the Electoral Count Reform Act, ” designed for state legislators and their staff, election officials, and other administrators. The report summarizes the impact of the ECRA on state law and provides six recommendations on what states need to look for—and potentially change.

“The Electoral Count Reform Act reflects a broad bipartisan consensus that clarity counts when the stakes are high and time is short,” said G. Michael Parsons, ERN Senior Counsel and lead author of the report. “The report aims to make implementation as simple as possible so states can carry on this important and timely work ahead of the 2024 presidential election.”

The ECRA updated the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which contained the ambiguous and outdated language that provided a pretext for attempts to subvert the 2020 election. Recognizing the importance of clarity for the processes governing a peaceful transfer of power, Congress affirmed the purely ministerial role of the vice president, tightly narrowed the grounds for objection to electoral votes in Congress, and underlined the primacy of courts in resolving election disputes. In addition, the ECRA added new procedures to avoid any ambiguity around the validity of electoral votes received from the states.

Because of these changes, there are now discrepancies between state and federal laws. “We shouldn’t be relying on eleventh-hour litigation in 2024 to fix foreseeable issues that can be addressed today,” said ERN Executive Director Kevin Johnson. “We don’t need to take that chance.”

The report’s recommendations need not always be adopted through legislation—some could be incorporated through rule-making and guidance, or even referenced by courts when determining appropriate requirements, remedies, and deadlines in particular cases.

The report will go to election officials and legislators in all 50 states. In some locations ERN will be working directly with state leaders to advance the needed changes.

The report and executive summary can be read on the ERN website, along with other election resources.

Latest news

MAGA Gerrymandering, Pardons, Executive Actions Signal Heightened 2026 Voting Rights Threats
Electoral Reforms

MAGA Gerrymandering, Pardons, Executive Actions Signal Heightened 2026 Voting Rights Threats

The Welfare Queen Myth: How Racist Stereotypes Still Shape America’s War on Poverty
Economy

The Welfare Queen Myth: How Racist Stereotypes Still Shape America’s War on Poverty

elections
Elections

Political Déjà vu after the Election

The U.S. Capitol is seen on Nov, 5, 2025.
Rule of Law

House Speaker’s Refusal To Seat Arizona Representative Is Supported by History and Law

Read More

Has Trump already lost the Latino vote?

A man holds up a "Latinos for Trump" sign at a protest after Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election in Austin, Texas on Nov. 7, 2020.

(Sergio Flores/AFP via Getty Images/TNS)

Has Trump already lost the Latino vote?

For generations, foreign policy eggheads debated the question, “Who lost China?” I’m wondering if election analysts might soon ask, “Who lost the Latinos?”

Almost exactly one year ago, President Trump won an impressive election victory. It wasn’t the landslide his boosters claim, but it was decisive. And Trump’s record-breaking success with Latino voters played a crucial part.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Unfolding Democratic Insurgency

Zohran Mamdani’s stunning NYC win marks a turning point for the Democratic Party, revealing generational revolt, establishment decline, and a new progressive wave.

Getty Images, Michael M. Santiago

The Unfolding Democratic Insurgency

The Democratic Party stands at the precipice of a profound internal reckoning. For decades, it has balanced precariously between populist aspiration and corporate capture, a tension that has now reached its breaking point.

The election of Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York City has shattered the illusion of establishment inevitability. What once seemed impossible — a socialist, anti-corporate, anti-war, anti-Zionist candidate winning the largest city in America — has become real. The moral center of the party is shifting; it is now clear beyond debate, and those in power, from Jeffries to Schumer, appear increasingly tone-deaf to the political and generational currents transforming their base.

Keep ReadingShow less
A scientist analyzes a virus sample in a laboratory.

U.S. science faces a growing crisis as NIH and NSF funding cuts shrink the STEM pipeline, threaten innovation, and push young researchers out of the field.

Getty Images, JazzIRT

A Broken Pipeline: Costing Us Our Next Generation of Scientists

Science has always relied on young innovators to drive progress. In 1998, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, still PhD students, founded Google. More recently, in 2020 and 2021, Kizzmekia Corbett, then a senior research fellow at the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Vaccine Research Center, led a team of scientists in developing the COVID-19 vaccine in under a year. These breakthroughs remind us that scientific advancement depends on nurturing a full pipeline of scientists—from young people learning about STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) to early-career researchers preparing the next transformative discovery.

Yet today, that pipeline is at risk with recent funding cuts. President Trump has aggressively scaled back government spending, promising to “get more bang for America’s research bucks.” In just nine short months, the administration canceled 7,737 research grants, totaling $8 billion from the NIH and the National Science Foundation (NSF). As a result, early-career scientists are leaving the field – what The Economist calls an “academic brain drain.” STEM programs for K-12 students are diminishing due to insufficient funding, despite evidence that early exposure to science motivates students to pursue STEM careers.

Keep ReadingShow less
Immigrant Workers Keep the U.S. Economy Running Even as Policy Turns Against Them

Electrician Gabriel Farías carries tools before starting work in San Diego, California.

Credit: Alex Segura

Immigrant Workers Keep the U.S. Economy Running Even as Policy Turns Against Them

On a cool November morning, electrician Gabriel Farías loads his tools into the back of a white van parked outside a housing complex under construction east of San Diego. He takes a sip of coffee and shakes his head. “Everywhere I work, there are immigrants,” he says. “They do the jobs no one else wants. For me, they’re essential.”

Farías came to California several years ago and now works legally for a local company. He says the construction sector, already stretched thin, would collapse without immigrant labor. But lately, something has changed. “Around midyear, you could already notice it,” he tells The Fulcrum. “Before, immigrants used to show up looking for work every day. That’s dropped a lot. Many are afraid of raids or being deported.”

Keep ReadingShow less
© Copyright 2025