Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Enough. Time to Build: Racial healers are stepping up in Flint, Mich.

Opinion

Map showing Flint, Mich.
NoDerog/Getty Images

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

Flint, Mich., is known nationally for everything that is wrong with it. Water crisis. Persistent poverty. Crime. Lost automotive jobs. Declining population. But I just returned to Flint for a series of “Enough. Time to Build.” campaign events, 25 years after I worked with the community — and there’s a lot right with this town. In fact, Flint is a rising symbol of how America can build together.

I got into Flint late on a Tuesday. Just hours later I was meeting with a group of 15 or so Flint residents who call themselves racial healing practitioners, in advance of a public event the following day. They came from all parts of town. They included Black, Latino and white folks, among others. They were different ages and income levels. In short, they reflected the rich diversity of Flint. They reflected much of America.


It was an especially frigid night, which is saying something given Michigan‘s notorious winters. But people braved the cold and came out. We spent two hours together in folding chairs around plastic tables. We talked about the meaning of their work and how they can deepen and accelerate it. At a time of rampant division, pervasive mistrust and lost hope in our society, what emerged is a story of perseverance, grit, progress and authentic hope.

One individual, a middle-aged Black man, was particularly vocal. He called Flint’s journey as a community, and more specifically its efforts combating racism, an “ongoing struggle.” His voice rose at times, his frustration palpable. Much more progress is needed, he declared. He’s tired of waiting.

And yet, this man and others in the room spoke of the remarkable progress their shared efforts were producing. They told me about how their racial healing work had catalyzed a chain reaction of actions in Flint that was spreading throughout the community, extending well beyond racial healing.

It begins with their own group. Amid so much loneliness and isolation in our lives, these racial healing practitioners had created a special home for themselves — a place where they could connect and be vulnerable about the difficult issues facing Flint and in their own lives. A noticeable quiet came over the once noisy room as different individuals testified to the bonds of trust they had forged with one another — indeed, the love they had come to share for one another. We all long for such trust, connection and belonging.

They had been trained to hold racial healing circles, bringing people together from across Flint to have hard conversations about race and racism. These aren’t easy conversations anywhere or at any time. There has been much written about how such conversations can blow up, even lead to more acrimony and division. But they said people throughout the community are yearning for these conversations. They keep holding them, and people keep coming. Demand is going up, not down. Something noteworthy is happening in Flint.

I often say that “talk alone” won’t solve the problems we face today. I have come to firmly believe this. We need to build together, and that’s what they are doing in Flint. The conversations they’re holding are rippling into various organizations and institutions, which is prompting concrete action to change how these groups relate to the community and do their work. For years, Flint’s organizations expected residents to change according to their plans; now, organizations are changing to meet residents where they are. This is producing new initiatives and programs at places like the Community Foundation of Greater Flint, Flint Neighborhoods United and the Sloan Museum of Discovery.

I launched our “Enough. Time to Build.” campaign because I believe the change we need in this country is going to come from local communities. These racial healers are demonstrating that behaviors, mindsets and norms can shift, and that healing can occur. This is what we need to see more of across the country.

As the hours passed that evening, I kept looking around the room, and I kept thinking to myself how special that group was. The diversity and different lived experiences. The passion and practicality. The strength and vulnerability. The obstacles and the progress. The frustration and the sense of hope.

So much of our society is wrapped around pushing division, hate, bigotry, despair and winning at any cost. Yet here are the healers. Everyday folks doing remarkable things. They are builders in the truest sense. Creators of something stronger, better, more inclusive. They are agents of hope.

One racial healer already emailed to continue the conversation. There’s more work to do in Flint just like there is across our nation.

Read More

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less