Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Americans want a new civic path, not more divisive politics

Silhouettes of red and blue people reaching across a divide
timsa/Getty Images

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

Just recently I was interviewed by Judy Woodruff for her series “America at a Crossroads” on “PBS NewsHour.” In response to a question about how we address our big national divisions, I said this: “If we can get on a civic path, we can actually make progress. Not only can we make progress, we can push out the culture wars. We can push out the [divisive] politics that are seeping in [to our local communities].”

Making the case for a new civic path is at the core of our “Enough. Time to Build.” campaign.


In recent weeks, I’ve been everywhere from Rep. Jim Jordan’s district in Ohio to Stamford, Conn. Fresno, Calif., to Burlington, N.C. Flint, Mich., to Pensacola, Fla., which just so happens to be Matt Gaetz’s congressional district. Most recently, I was in Colorado, speaking in both Fort Collins and Loveland. It just so happens Loveland is in the district where Rep. Lauren Boebert is running to replace retiring Rep. Ken Buck.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Why is this campaign the only one being invited to communities across the political spectrum? Because Americans of all backgrounds — no matter who you vote for these days — are tired of our divisive politics. They are hungry for an alternative but don’t see a clear path forward.

The presidential race consumes most news coverage these days with topics like court battles, opposition research and what the third party candidates are up to. It all begs the question: Does all the noise really matter to people’s daily lives? In my 35 years working to revitalize and strengthen communities in all 50 states, I’ve seen the American people go from being fed up with politics in the 1990s to seeing politics as largely irrelevant today.

This is why Americans have such a yearning for a real alternative. But it’s fair to ask, “Why is this campaign working?”

I think the answer is clear. It’s not because of me. Rather, it’s because Americans of all political persuasions want to put our country on a new trajectory of hope. Look again at the places I listed. This campaign isn’t going to just red or blue strongholds. Nor am I just in battleground states looking for elusive swing voters. Consider one recent stretch where I went from Rep. Matt Gaetz’s district in Florida to Stamford to Loveland. You can’t get a much starker sequence of red, blue and battleground than that.

What’s also notable about the communities where I’m taking this campaign is that they run the gamut from struggling to rapidly growing to stagnated. Yet each is wrestling with deep fault lines.

Stamfordis f acing widening inequities and disparities and its growing Latino population and working families are at risk of being left behind. In Loveland, the toxic national discourse is increasingly seeping in and infecting their public square. Fort Collins has experienced rapid growth that’s putting pressure on housing affordability and access to resources for new and long-time residents. Pensacola is in danger of being consumed by book banning debates even as their local schools struggle to ensure students acquire basic reading skills.

My point is this: In every case, these communities have invited our campaign because they have come to see it’s time to embrace a new civic path forward that enables us to address what matters to people. Perhaps even more importantly, they see it as essential to strengthening their civic culture. The relationships, norms, networks and sense of shared purpose that determine our ability to take action on the issues that really matter to people, make room for all voices, and create a greater sense of connection and belonging.

Through this campaign, I continue to meet more and more community leaders and active citizens who recognize that the answers to what ails us are within our local communities. Within each of us.

Everywhere I travel these days, when I lay out this alternative civic path, community leaders and active citizens inevitably join me in saying,“Enough. It’s time to build.” One leader in Burlington put it this way after hearing me make the case for a new civic path: “It’s the actions of local citizens that are really going to be the catalyst for the change we want to see. I came out of tonight with a sense of hope that this is work that we can do here. It’s really the most significant work we can do.”

That’s the mindset — and the action — that forging a civic path has the power to unleash.

Read More

silhouettes of people arguing in front of an America flag
Pict Rider/Getty Images

'One side will win': The danger of zero-sum framings

Elwood is the author of “Defusing American Anger” and hosts thepodcast “People Who Read People.”

Recently, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was surreptitiously recorded at a private event saying, about our political divides, that “one side or the other is going to win.” Many people saw this as evidence of his political bias. In The Washington Post, Perry Bacon Jr. wrote that he disagreed with Alito’s politics but that the justice was “right about the divisions in our nation today.” The subtitle of Bacon’s piece was: “America is in the middle of a nonmilitary civil war, and one side will win.”

It’s natural for people in conflict to see it in “us versus them” terms — as two opposing armies facing off against each other on the battlefield. That’s what conflict does to us: It makes us see things through war-colored glasses.

Keep ReadingShow less
David French

New York Times columnist David French was removed from the agenda of a faith-basd gathering because we was too "divisive."

Macmillan Publishers

Is canceling David French good for civic life?

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

On June 10-14, the Presbyterian Church in America held its annual denominational assembly in Richmond, Va. The PCA created considerable national buzz in the lead-up when it abruptly canceled a panel discussion featuring David French, the highly regarded author and New York Times columnist.

The panel carried the innocuous-sounding title, “How to Be Supportive of Your Pastor and Church Leaders in a Polarized Political Year.” The reason for canceling it? French, himself a long-time PCA member, was deemed too “divisive.” This despite being a well-known, self-identified “conservative” and PCA adherent. Ironically, the loudest and most divisive voices won the day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young girl holding a sparkler and wearing an American flag shirt
Rebecca Nelson/Getty Images

Three approaches to Independence Day

Anderson edited "Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework," has taught at five universities and ran for the Democratic nomination for a Maryland congressional seat in 2016.

July Fourth is not like Christmas or Rosh Hashanah, holidays that create a unified sense of celebration among celebrants. On Christmas, Christians throughout the world celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. On Rosh Hashanah, Jews throughout the world celebrate the Jewish New Year.

Yet on the Fourth of July, apart from the family gatherings, barbecues and drinking, we take different approaches. Some Americans celebrate the declaration of America's independence from Great Britain and especially the value of freedom. And some Americans reject the holiday, because they believe it highlights the self-contradiction of the United States, which created a nation in which some would be free and some would be enslaved. And other Americans are conflicted between these two points of view.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fireworks on July 4
Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

One country, one constitution, one destiny

Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."

“One country, one constitution, one destiny,” Daniel Webster said in a historic 1837 speech defending the American Union.

This of Fourth of July, 187 years after Webster’s speech and the 248th anniversary of the signing of our Declaration of Independence, Webster would no doubt be dismayed to find his quote reconstrued by popular opinion to read something like this:

“Divided country, debated constitution, and as for destiny, we’re going to hell in a hand-basket.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Rich Harwood
Harwood Institute

Meet the change leaders: Rich Harwood

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

After working on more than 20 political campaigns and two highly respected nonprofits, Rich Harwood set out to create something entirely different. He founded what is now known as The Harwood Institute for Public Innovation in 1988, when he was just 27 years old (and is now its president). Soon after, he wrote the ground-breaking report “Citizen and Politics: A View from Main Street,” the first national study to uncover that Americans did not feel apathetic about politics, but instead held a deep sense of anger and disconnection.

Over the past 30 years, Rich has innovated and developed a new philosophy and practice for how communities can solve shared problems, create a culture of shared responsibility and deepen people’s civic faith. The Harwood practice of Turning Outward has spread to all 50 states and is being used in 40 countries.

Keep ReadingShow less