Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Americans want a new civic path, not more divisive politics

Silhouettes of red and blue people reaching across a divide
timsa/Getty Images

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

Just recently I was interviewed by Judy Woodruff for her series “America at a Crossroads” on “PBS NewsHour.” In response to a question about how we address our big national divisions, I said this: “If we can get on a civic path, we can actually make progress. Not only can we make progress, we can push out the culture wars. We can push out the [divisive] politics that are seeping in [to our local communities].”

Making the case for a new civic path is at the core of our “Enough. Time to Build.” campaign.


In recent weeks, I’ve been everywhere from Rep. Jim Jordan’s district in Ohio to Stamford, Conn. Fresno, Calif., to Burlington, N.C. Flint, Mich., to Pensacola, Fla., which just so happens to be Matt Gaetz’s congressional district. Most recently, I was in Colorado, speaking in both Fort Collins and Loveland. It just so happens Loveland is in the district where Rep. Lauren Boebert is running to replace retiring Rep. Ken Buck.

Why is this campaign the only one being invited to communities across the political spectrum? Because Americans of all backgrounds — no matter who you vote for these days — are tired of our divisive politics. They are hungry for an alternative but don’t see a clear path forward.

The presidential race consumes most news coverage these days with topics like court battles, opposition research and what the third party candidates are up to. It all begs the question: Does all the noise really matter to people’s daily lives? In my 35 years working to revitalize and strengthen communities in all 50 states, I’ve seen the American people go from being fed up with politics in the 1990s to seeing politics as largely irrelevant today.

This is why Americans have such a yearning for a real alternative. But it’s fair to ask, “Why is this campaign working?”

I think the answer is clear. It’s not because of me. Rather, it’s because Americans of all political persuasions want to put our country on a new trajectory of hope. Look again at the places I listed. This campaign isn’t going to just red or blue strongholds. Nor am I just in battleground states looking for elusive swing voters. Consider one recent stretch where I went from Rep. Matt Gaetz’s district in Florida to Stamford to Loveland. You can’t get a much starker sequence of red, blue and battleground than that.

What’s also notable about the communities where I’m taking this campaign is that they run the gamut from struggling to rapidly growing to stagnated. Yet each is wrestling with deep fault lines.

Stamfordis f acing widening inequities and disparities and its growing Latino population and working families are at risk of being left behind. In Loveland, the toxic national discourse is increasingly seeping in and infecting their public square. Fort Collins has experienced rapid growth that’s putting pressure on housing affordability and access to resources for new and long-time residents. Pensacola is in danger of being consumed by book banning debates even as their local schools struggle to ensure students acquire basic reading skills.

My point is this: In every case, these communities have invited our campaign because they have come to see it’s time to embrace a new civic path forward that enables us to address what matters to people. Perhaps even more importantly, they see it as essential to strengthening their civic culture. The relationships, norms, networks and sense of shared purpose that determine our ability to take action on the issues that really matter to people, make room for all voices, and create a greater sense of connection and belonging.

Through this campaign, I continue to meet more and more community leaders and active citizens who recognize that the answers to what ails us are within our local communities. Within each of us.

Everywhere I travel these days, when I lay out this alternative civic path, community leaders and active citizens inevitably join me in saying, “Enough. It’s time to build.” One leader in Burlington put it this way after hearing me make the case for a new civic path: “It’s the actions of local citizens that are really going to be the catalyst for the change we want to see. I came out of tonight with a sense of hope that this is work that we can do here. It’s really the most significant work we can do.”

That’s the mindset — and the action — that forging a civic path has the power to unleash.


Read More

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view of teenage boy walking with arm around friends

Why many young men feel politically and socially adrift, how changing gender roles affect masculinity, self-esteem, relationships, and the future of society.

Maskot / Getty Images

Lost Boys - What Is the Role of a Man in Today's Society?

A recent New York Times article stated that young males who provided an important swing vote for Trump in 2024 are discouraged by what Trump has done and not done while in office. But they are nevertheless not particularly inclined to vote Democratic because they don't see the Party as welcoming their view of masculinity and they don't know where they fit in this society.

These young men assume that because the Party supports equality for women in the workplace and because many young women no longer have marriage and having children at the top of their agenda, the Party would not be a welcoming home for them. They see themselves as striving for the masculinity of their fathers' or grandfathers' day, where the man was the breadwinner in the family and had respect and authority. Not the weaker half in relationships with women.

Keep ReadingShow less
Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

NECHAMA volunteers in Western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene.

Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

As the Atlantic hurricane season officially began on June 1, disaster response organizations across the country are preparing for the next storm. That preparation includes coordinating logistics, purchasing supplies, training volunteers, and strengthening partnerships. It now also requires planning for an environment shaped by misinformation, distrust, and competing narratives.

A recent 60 Minutes segment examining extremist groups in disaster zones highlighted how quickly public perceptions can form after a disaster. Recovery efforts are now followed by outside groups and online networks attempting to influence how events are understood while communities are still in crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less