Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Americans want a new civic path, not more divisive politics

Silhouettes of red and blue people reaching across a divide
timsa/Getty Images

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

Just recently I was interviewed by Judy Woodruff for her series “America at a Crossroads” on “PBS NewsHour.” In response to a question about how we address our big national divisions, I said this: “If we can get on a civic path, we can actually make progress. Not only can we make progress, we can push out the culture wars. We can push out the [divisive] politics that are seeping in [to our local communities].”

Making the case for a new civic path is at the core of our “Enough. Time to Build.” campaign.


In recent weeks, I’ve been everywhere from Rep. Jim Jordan’s district in Ohio to Stamford, Conn. Fresno, Calif., to Burlington, N.C. Flint, Mich., to Pensacola, Fla., which just so happens to be Matt Gaetz’s congressional district. Most recently, I was in Colorado, speaking in both Fort Collins and Loveland. It just so happens Loveland is in the district where Rep. Lauren Boebert is running to replace retiring Rep. Ken Buck.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Why is this campaign the only one being invited to communities across the political spectrum? Because Americans of all backgrounds — no matter who you vote for these days — are tired of our divisive politics. They are hungry for an alternative but don’t see a clear path forward.

The presidential race consumes most news coverage these days with topics like court battles, opposition research and what the third party candidates are up to. It all begs the question: Does all the noise really matter to people’s daily lives? In my 35 years working to revitalize and strengthen communities in all 50 states, I’ve seen the American people go from being fed up with politics in the 1990s to seeing politics as largely irrelevant today.

This is why Americans have such a yearning for a real alternative. But it’s fair to ask, “Why is this campaign working?”

I think the answer is clear. It’s not because of me. Rather, it’s because Americans of all political persuasions want to put our country on a new trajectory of hope. Look again at the places I listed. This campaign isn’t going to just red or blue strongholds. Nor am I just in battleground states looking for elusive swing voters. Consider one recent stretch where I went from Rep. Matt Gaetz’s district in Florida to Stamford to Loveland. You can’t get a much starker sequence of red, blue and battleground than that.

What’s also notable about the communities where I’m taking this campaign is that they run the gamut from struggling to rapidly growing to stagnated. Yet each is wrestling with deep fault lines.

Stamfordis f acing widening inequities and disparities and its growing Latino population and working families are at risk of being left behind. In Loveland, the toxic national discourse is increasingly seeping in and infecting their public square. Fort Collins has experienced rapid growth that’s putting pressure on housing affordability and access to resources for new and long-time residents. Pensacola is in danger of being consumed by book banning debates even as their local schools struggle to ensure students acquire basic reading skills.

My point is this: In every case, these communities have invited our campaign because they have come to see it’s time to embrace a new civic path forward that enables us to address what matters to people. Perhaps even more importantly, they see it as essential to strengthening their civic culture. The relationships, norms, networks and sense of shared purpose that determine our ability to take action on the issues that really matter to people, make room for all voices, and create a greater sense of connection and belonging.

Through this campaign, I continue to meet more and more community leaders and active citizens who recognize that the answers to what ails us are within our local communities. Within each of us.

Everywhere I travel these days, when I lay out this alternative civic path, community leaders and active citizens inevitably join me in saying,“Enough. It’s time to build.” One leader in Burlington put it this way after hearing me make the case for a new civic path: “It’s the actions of local citizens that are really going to be the catalyst for the change we want to see. I came out of tonight with a sense of hope that this is work that we can do here. It’s really the most significant work we can do.”

That’s the mindset — and the action — that forging a civic path has the power to unleash.

Read More

Older woman speaking with another woman

Listen for values and emotions, not just points you can rebut with facts.

kupicoo/Getty Images

Vaccines and values: When you’re having a tough conversation about medicine, don’t just pile on evidence − listen to someone’s ‘moral foundations’

It’s that special time of year when family and friends come together to celebrate the holidays, share meals, spread cheer – and, too often, pass along their germs.

Because vaccines can save lives and prevent serious illness, health professionals have long recommended vaccinations for influenza, COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV. Yet despite these apparent benefits, many people decline.

Keep ReadingShow less
civic education notebook

We need to increase emphasis on schools as a more effective location for teaching interpersonal civil discourse.

Zhanna Hapanovich/Getty Images

4 S’s showcase how dialogue fits and where other approaches work best

In my previous article, I explained the “4 R’s” that should cause people to reconsider the extremely strong emphasis on civil discourse in efforts to reduce political divides in the United States. I also promised suggestions for how to use dialogue most effectively, in specific circumstances, and when non-dialogue approaches may be best.

A brief overview of the 4 R’s to reconsider such a heavy focus on dialogue reminds us that it is difficult to get many people to attend events (recruitment), civil discourse is not inherently effective (reliability), even a successful 1:1 interaction may not generalize to the entire out-party (representativeness) and getting people to repeatedly use skills learned is challenging (repetition).

Keep ReadingShow less
Caucasian business people talking on bench outdoors

Civil discourse can be effective, but its effectiveness is limited.

Jetta Productions Inc./Getty Images

The 4 R’s reduce dialogue workshop effectiveness – but don’t despair

In some circles, reducing political divides and civil discourse are almost synonymous. I’ve had conversations where I mention that I work on reducing these divides, only to have the other person launch into some story or opinion about civil discourse.

By “civil discourse,” I mean an interpersonal focus on communication, which can include activities like dialogue or certain types of debates.

Keep ReadingShow less
city skyline

Reading, Pennsylvania, can be a model for a path forward.

arlutz73/Getty Images

The election couldn’t solve our crisis of belief. Here’s what can.

The stark divisions surrounding the recent presidential election are still with us, and will be for some time. The reason is clear: We have a crisis of belief in this country that goes much deeper than any single election.

So many people, especially young people, have lost faith in America. We have lost belief in our leaders, institutions and systems. Even in one another. Recent years have seen us roiled by debates over racial injustice, fatigued by wars, troubled by growing inequities and disparities, and worried about the very health of our democracy. We are awash in manufactured polarization, hatred and bigotry, mistrust, and a lack of hope.

Keep ReadingShow less