Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Americans want a new civic path, not more divisive politics

Silhouettes of red and blue people reaching across a divide
timsa/Getty Images

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

Just recently I was interviewed by Judy Woodruff for her series “America at a Crossroads” on “PBS NewsHour.” In response to a question about how we address our big national divisions, I said this: “If we can get on a civic path, we can actually make progress. Not only can we make progress, we can push out the culture wars. We can push out the [divisive] politics that are seeping in [to our local communities].”

Making the case for a new civic path is at the core of our “Enough. Time to Build.” campaign.


In recent weeks, I’ve been everywhere from Rep. Jim Jordan’s district in Ohio to Stamford, Conn. Fresno, Calif., to Burlington, N.C. Flint, Mich., to Pensacola, Fla., which just so happens to be Matt Gaetz’s congressional district. Most recently, I was in Colorado, speaking in both Fort Collins and Loveland. It just so happens Loveland is in the district where Rep. Lauren Boebert is running to replace retiring Rep. Ken Buck.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Why is this campaign the only one being invited to communities across the political spectrum? Because Americans of all backgrounds — no matter who you vote for these days — are tired of our divisive politics. They are hungry for an alternative but don’t see a clear path forward.

The presidential race consumes most news coverage these days with topics like court battles, opposition research and what the third party candidates are up to. It all begs the question: Does all the noise really matter to people’s daily lives? In my 35 years working to revitalize and strengthen communities in all 50 states, I’ve seen the American people go from being fed up with politics in the 1990s to seeing politics as largely irrelevant today.

This is why Americans have such a yearning for a real alternative. But it’s fair to ask, “Why is this campaign working?”

I think the answer is clear. It’s not because of me. Rather, it’s because Americans of all political persuasions want to put our country on a new trajectory of hope. Look again at the places I listed. This campaign isn’t going to just red or blue strongholds. Nor am I just in battleground states looking for elusive swing voters. Consider one recent stretch where I went from Rep. Matt Gaetz’s district in Florida to Stamford to Loveland. You can’t get a much starker sequence of red, blue and battleground than that.

What’s also notable about the communities where I’m taking this campaign is that they run the gamut from struggling to rapidly growing to stagnated. Yet each is wrestling with deep fault lines.

Stamfordis f acing widening inequities and disparities and its growing Latino population and working families are at risk of being left behind. In Loveland, the toxic national discourse is increasingly seeping in and infecting their public square. Fort Collins has experienced rapid growth that’s putting pressure on housing affordability and access to resources for new and long-time residents. Pensacola is in danger of being consumed by book banning debates even as their local schools struggle to ensure students acquire basic reading skills.

My point is this: In every case, these communities have invited our campaign because they have come to see it’s time to embrace a new civic path forward that enables us to address what matters to people. Perhaps even more importantly, they see it as essential to strengthening their civic culture. The relationships, norms, networks and sense of shared purpose that determine our ability to take action on the issues that really matter to people, make room for all voices, and create a greater sense of connection and belonging.

Through this campaign, I continue to meet more and more community leaders and active citizens who recognize that the answers to what ails us are within our local communities. Within each of us.

Everywhere I travel these days, when I lay out this alternative civic path, community leaders and active citizens inevitably join me in saying,“Enough. It’s time to build.” One leader in Burlington put it this way after hearing me make the case for a new civic path: “It’s the actions of local citizens that are really going to be the catalyst for the change we want to see. I came out of tonight with a sense of hope that this is work that we can do here. It’s really the most significant work we can do.”

That’s the mindset — and the action — that forging a civic path has the power to unleash.

Read More

 Yphtach Lelkes

"When everyone on your side believes one thing and everyone on the other side believes the other thing, you can no longer build coalitions, and democracy doesn't work very well," said Yphtach Lelkes, co-director of the Polarization Research Lab.

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

‘The problem comes from the top’: A conversation with Yphtach Lelkes

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the fifth in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

On Jan. 6, 2021, the threat of political violence in the United States became an issue of urgent national concern. America has long had political extremists who have advocated for violent struggle of one kind or another — Weather Underground, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers and others. But the rioting on Capitol Hill seemed to suggest something else entirely — namely, that support for political violence had moved from the fringes and into the mainstream of American life.

According to Robert Pape of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats at the University of Chicago, more than half of the Jan. 6 insurrectionists were white-collar workers — business owners, architects, doctors and lawyers. “We need to really come to grips with the fact that what we saw on Jan. 6 is not simply the usual bad apples acting out yet again,” Pape says.

What do Americans really think about political violence? How widespread is support for the use of force to achieve political goals? It is difficult to wrap your arms around these kinds of questions. Different polls suggest different answers.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
A person feelign anxiety, peering through an American flag

Resist demonizing the "other" side, writes Javanbakht.

Moor Studio/Getty Images

Dealing with election anxiety? A psychiatrist explains how to channel your fears and break out of tribal thinking.

Javanbakht is an associate professor of psychiatry at Wayne State University.

Instead of excitement about the upcoming election, many of my patients and friends – regardless of political affiliation – report they’re terrified at the thought of the “other side” winning. Democrats tell me they fear Donald Trump will end our democracy; Republicans are afraid Kamala Harris will turn the United States into a socialist society without family values.

Watching the news leaves people from both parties exhausted, sad and scared about the future. Each half of the country is made to believe the other half is stupid, deeply misguided, immoral, dishonest or maliciously plotting to ruin the country they themselves love.

I am a psychiatrist who specializes in treating and researching fear and anxiety. My book, “Afraid: Understanding the Purpose of Fear, and Harnessing the Power of Anxiety,” explores the politics of fear and the role media play in modern anxieties. Scientific insights on fear can provide a helpful perspective on election anxieties and suggest some practical tips on managing politics-related worries.

Keep ReadingShow less
Peter Colman

“This is a highly armed, highly angry, frustrated society where a lot of the leaders are using divisive, hostile, violent discourse to blame the other side or to blame the institutions,” said Columbia professor Peter Coleman.

Peter Coleman

'It's time to be very afraid': A conversation with Peter Coleman

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the fourth in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

“I am very worried about political violence,” Columbia University professor Peter Coleman told C-SPAN in August 2023. “You have such anger in the media — it increases the chances that people with weapons and rage are going to become violent.”

Coleman is not the only American who feels this way, but he is one of the few who is devoting his career to combating the kind of toxic polarization that he believes is a precursor to political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Owensboro, KY

Owensboro, Ky.

Tapan Mehta/Getty Images

It's time to rethink how we create change. Owensboro offers a way.

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

Conventional wisdom tells us that Americans don’t have the will and ability nowadays to come together and take shared action to move forward. But that’s dead wrong. It’s why I spend so much of my professional life working deeply with communities that seek to address America’s fault lines — places like Reading, Pa., Union County, Ohio, and Alamance County, N.C.

I recently kicked off our latest community initiative in Owensboro, Ky., by speaking at what’s affectionately called the “Rooster Booster Breakfast,” which is hosted by the regional Chamber of Commerce. More than 300 folks — a “who’s who” of the community — packed into Owensboro’s stunning riverfront convention center.

Keep ReadingShow less