Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

What gives me hope? Logan County, Ohio.

Building with a fountain in front

The courthouse in Bellefontaine, the seat of Logan County, Ohio.

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

It’s a natural human impulse to make assumptions about other people. To make snap judgments based on little, or sometimes even no, information. And in today’s divided political climate, our assumptions are often colored by our political preferences.

Consider Logan County, Ohio. It’s over 90 percent white, largely conservative and rural. It happens to be in the district representated by Jim Jordan, a founder of the House Freedom Caucus and one of the most vocal members of congress.

I was just in Logan County — and nearby Union County — to hold an in-person Getting Started Lab, a two-day experience that trains leaders in the Harwood Institute approach and equips them to become catalytic actors. This lab is part of our larger effort there in partnership with the local United Way to catalyze community-led change and build the community’s civic strength by addressing what matters to people.


Everywhere my work takes me these days — from Jackson, Miss., to Fresno, Calif., to Flint, Mich. — I hear the same sentiment from Americans of all backgrounds, ethnicities, and political persuasions. Over and over, they tell me, “We want to focus on what really matters, find new ways to work together and demonstrate that we can move forward.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Guess what? The leaders I met in Logan County said the very same thing.

Even better, they’re ready to get in motion. Sixty leaders came together for the lab to learn our approach and have formed three action Teams that will start to work on three areas: senior care, youth and health/mental health.

The excitement among these leaders when I showed them the possibility of a new path forward — one devoid of divisiveness and rancor — wasn’t just palpable, it was explicit. Early on day one of the lab, a participant reflected on the discussion we’d had to that point by saying, “This space that we’ve created together is refreshing because we’re not mired in discussions about culture wars. We’re talking about the future of our community.”

The Harwood Institute is engaged in similar long-term initiatives to lead community-driven change in Alamance County, N.C.; Reading, Pa.; Owensboro, Ky.; and DeSoto County, Fla. Every community we work with is iconic in its own way. They each have unique demographics, histories and challenges. Individually, they represent the different fault lines plaguing society today. Collectively, they showcase the beautiful possibility of what it looks like to form a more perfect union.

In every community, when we launch an initiative and hold a Getting Started Lab, people inevitably raise their hands to fill the labs. Afterward, teams form. And the teams immediately start to work on local concerns together.

Over time and without fail, the people who step forward in their respective communities end up unleashing a chain reaction. More people join the work over time as it spreads like a positive contagion. And the work invariably jumps to new areas beyond what the initial teams set out to address.

The takeaway? Amid all our division and mistrust, there’s a deep hunger among Americans to come together and put our communities — and the country — on a new path of hope. One that is grounded in a civic path forward, not more divisive politics. It’s why I’ve launched a new civic campaign called “Enough. Time to Build,” as a means of showing communities nationwide that there is a practical way for us to move forward if we reclaim the public square and unleash our capacity as builders and doers.

The Americans I meet in my work across this country yearn for practical, locally driven solutions to the challenges we face. Nobody I meet is looking for big, sweeping change or the promise of a quick fix. The leaders I met in Ohio were no exception. They were looking for proof that we have the will and ability to create change together, without leaving anyone behind. And they were ready to come together, even amid their real divides, to offer that proof.

I bump into a lot of people in this work who ask me, “What gives you hope?” In their question, I hear the anxiety and apprehension that’s accelerated in the years after Covid. And I feel the weight of the bleak future they often envision, one where our divides have overtaken us.

But that’s a question whose answer, for me, comes easily. I just have to think of the dozens of leaders I met a few weeks ago in Logan County, Ohio. They offer a beacon of hope to a nation in search of progress.

Read More

silhouettes of people arguing in front of an America flag
Pict Rider/Getty Images

'One side will win': The danger of zero-sum framings

Elwood is the author of “Defusing American Anger” and hosts thepodcast “People Who Read People.”

Recently, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was surreptitiously recorded at a private event saying, about our political divides, that “one side or the other is going to win.” Many people saw this as evidence of his political bias. In The Washington Post, Perry Bacon Jr. wrote that he disagreed with Alito’s politics but that the justice was “right about the divisions in our nation today.” The subtitle of Bacon’s piece was: “America is in the middle of a nonmilitary civil war, and one side will win.”

It’s natural for people in conflict to see it in “us versus them” terms — as two opposing armies facing off against each other on the battlefield. That’s what conflict does to us: It makes us see things through war-colored glasses.

Keep ReadingShow less
David French

New York Times columnist David French was removed from the agenda of a faith-basd gathering because we was too "divisive."

Macmillan Publishers

Is canceling David French good for civic life?

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

On June 10-14, the Presbyterian Church in America held its annual denominational assembly in Richmond, Va. The PCA created considerable national buzz in the lead-up when it abruptly canceled a panel discussion featuring David French, the highly regarded author and New York Times columnist.

The panel carried the innocuous-sounding title, “How to Be Supportive of Your Pastor and Church Leaders in a Polarized Political Year.” The reason for canceling it? French, himself a long-time PCA member, was deemed too “divisive.” This despite being a well-known, self-identified “conservative” and PCA adherent. Ironically, the loudest and most divisive voices won the day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young girl holding a sparkler and wearing an American flag shirt
Rebecca Nelson/Getty Images

Three approaches to Independence Day

Anderson edited "Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework," has taught at five universities and ran for the Democratic nomination for a Maryland congressional seat in 2016.

July Fourth is not like Christmas or Rosh Hashanah, holidays that create a unified sense of celebration among celebrants. On Christmas, Christians throughout the world celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. On Rosh Hashanah, Jews throughout the world celebrate the Jewish New Year.

Yet on the Fourth of July, apart from the family gatherings, barbecues and drinking, we take different approaches. Some Americans celebrate the declaration of America's independence from Great Britain and especially the value of freedom. And some Americans reject the holiday, because they believe it highlights the self-contradiction of the United States, which created a nation in which some would be free and some would be enslaved. And other Americans are conflicted between these two points of view.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fireworks on July 4
Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

One country, one constitution, one destiny

Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."

“One country, one constitution, one destiny,” Daniel Webster said in a historic 1837 speech defending the American Union.

This of Fourth of July, 187 years after Webster’s speech and the 248th anniversary of the signing of our Declaration of Independence, Webster would no doubt be dismayed to find his quote reconstrued by popular opinion to read something like this:

“Divided country, debated constitution, and as for destiny, we’re going to hell in a hand-basket.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Rich Harwood
Harwood Institute

Meet the change leaders: Rich Harwood

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

After working on more than 20 political campaigns and two highly respected nonprofits, Rich Harwood set out to create something entirely different. He founded what is now known as The Harwood Institute for Public Innovation in 1988, when he was just 27 years old (and is now its president). Soon after, he wrote the ground-breaking report “Citizen and Politics: A View from Main Street,” the first national study to uncover that Americans did not feel apathetic about politics, but instead held a deep sense of anger and disconnection.

Over the past 30 years, Rich has innovated and developed a new philosophy and practice for how communities can solve shared problems, create a culture of shared responsibility and deepen people’s civic faith. The Harwood practice of Turning Outward has spread to all 50 states and is being used in 40 countries.

Keep ReadingShow less