Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

It's time to rethink how we create change. Owensboro offers a way.

Owensboro, KY

Owensboro, Ky.

Tapan Mehta/Getty Images

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

Conventional wisdom tells us that Americans don’t have the will and ability nowadays to come together and take shared action to move forward. But that’s dead wrong. It’s why I spend so much of my professional life working deeply with communities that seek to address America’s fault lines — places like Reading, Pa., Union County, Ohio, and Alamance County, N.C.

I recently kicked off our latest community initiative in Owensboro, Ky., by speaking at what’s affectionately called the “Rooster Booster Breakfast,” which is hosted by the regional Chamber of Commerce. More than 300 folks — a “who’s who” of the community — packed into Owensboro’s stunning riverfront convention center.


Owensboro is family-oriented, faith-based and built on deep interpersonal relationships. There’s been significant downtown redevelopment. And people take enormous pride in living there. But the area is also dealing with an array of challenges, from homelessness to a lack of youth opportunities to growing disparities between the haves and the have nots. Their civic culture —the relationships, norms, leaders, organizations and networks that enable a community to work together — has badly frayed and must be strengthened if the community is to make real progress.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

I ultimately told them they face a fundamental choice: Adhere to the status quo and risk stagnation or seize opportunities to come together in new ways and build a better Owensboro.

Their response: a standing ovation.

Why? Because people in Owensboro are hungry for a new path forward, just like Americans all over the country. It’s a big reason why our“Enough. Time to Build.” campaign is spreading nationwide so fast.

At issue in Owensboro is the danger of stagnation. That's different from, say, Reading, once declared the poorest community in America. Or Union County, a largely rural area grappling with rapid growth. Or Alamance County, one of the most divided places I’ve worked.

Regardless of any community’s particular challenge, so much of our country is stuck, unsure how to move forward. On top of that, what I keep experiencing in my travels is that our instincts for how to create change tend to take us in exactly the wrong direction. We turn to comprehensive plans: Seek to get as many groups and organizations and leaders around the table as possible. Spend endless time trying to coordinate everyone’s actions. Prioritize raising boatloads of money. And promise fast change.

Let’s be clear: The state of the country calls for something much deeper, more real and more promising. We must rebuild our belief in one another, demonstrate proof that we can take shared action and create growing momentum over time. Full stop.

The good news is that this is doable. That’s why, during my speech and a series of roundtables I also held in Owensboro, I asked leaders and active citizens from all parts of the community to think about change differently. To see it in terms of “starting small to go big” rather than “bigger is better.” To shift from just “getting together” to actually working together. To find what they can agree on and get moving on it. To catalyze and unleash a chain reaction of actions that not only addresses what matters to people but also strengthens the community’s civic culture. And to focus on creating a new trajectory of hope rather than seeking to solve everything at once.

Without fail, in every setting, one individual after another raised their hand to say, “I have something to contribute. I want to work on this together.”

It’s time to recognize that our very instincts around creating change are taking us in the wrong direction and to recalibrate around the practical steps we can take to get things moving again. This is core to what I’ve come to callour “new civic path,” a fundamental alternative to business as usual.

People in Owensboro are starting to forge this new path. When enough of us seize this opportunity, we can build stronger communities. And in turn, we can build a stronger country.

Read More

Caleb Christen

Meet the change leaders: Caleb Christen

Nevins is co-publisher ofThe Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of theBridge Alliance Education Fund.

A lawyer by trade, Caleb Christen has served in the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps since 2007, including two deployments to the Middle East. He is now a senior officer in the Navy Reserve. Attending seminary and an executive education program in organizational leadership helped Christen identify that communities are not thriving as they were intended and that people must work together to transform American democracy and civic health.

As a result, Christen co-founded the Inter-Movement Impact Project to promote organizing for collective impact. His new focus is on “Better Together America,” a collaborative network providing support to the local democracy hubs that are emerging in communities across the United States.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mismatched letters speelling out "respect"
Thinglass

The power of disrespect: Introducing the Return2Respect movement

Marinace is the coordinator of the Return2Respect movement.

My first thought was to extol the virtues of respect. However, we all know respect is good and right and necessary. But do we really know the impacts of disrespect on individuals and our democratic principles?

Disrespect manifests itself through incivility, impacting how people relate to one another. A 2012 survey conducted by PRRI showed 82 percent of Americans believed lack of civil discourse among politicians was a serious problem. By 2023, a Pew study showed it still at 84 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red and blue heads colliding
wildpixel/Getty Images

Toxic political talk undermines the foundations of our country

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The 2024 presidential race is heating up and, with it, an alarming trend has emerged in how we as a nation are talking to each other. It's not just a matter of political strategy; it's a crisis that demands our immediate attention.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Yphtach Lelkes

"When everyone on your side believes one thing and everyone on the other side believes the other thing, you can no longer build coalitions, and democracy doesn't work very well," said Yphtach Lelkes, co-director of the Polarization Research Lab.

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

‘The problem comes from the top’: A conversation with Yphtach Lelkes

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the fifth in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

On Jan. 6, 2021, the threat of political violence in the United States became an issue of urgent national concern. America has long had political extremists who have advocated for violent struggle of one kind or another — Weather Underground, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers and others. But the rioting on Capitol Hill seemed to suggest something else entirely — namely, that support for political violence had moved from the fringes and into the mainstream of American life.

According to Robert Pape of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats at the University of Chicago, more than half of the Jan. 6 insurrectionists were white-collar workers — business owners, architects, doctors and lawyers. “We need to really come to grips with the fact that what we saw on Jan. 6 is not simply the usual bad apples acting out yet again,” Pape says.

What do Americans really think about political violence? How widespread is support for the use of force to achieve political goals? It is difficult to wrap your arms around these kinds of questions. Different polls suggest different answers.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up of dictionary definition of extremism
Devonyu/Getty Images

Casual extremism and how language in the middle enables the extremes

McAleer is the author of "The Cure For Hate – A Former White Supremacist's Journey From Violent Extremism To Radical Compassion." He co-founded Life After Hate and is a founding partner of the Builders Movement.

When I was a white supremacist who had infiltrated the Canadian military reserves, an officer who had spent two tours of Northern Ireland embedded in a British unit told me that the Irish Republican Army had only 75 active personnel who pulled triggers and planted bombs. Behind those combatants were 3,500 people who offered them safe houses and storage for their ammunition. Bolstering them was a much broader community of people who endorsed their efforts.

Ultimately, decades of sectarian violence were perpetrated by a small group of people on each side; but it was the broader public's support that gave extremists permission to carry out their carnage.

Keep ReadingShow less