Skip to content

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Causes and consequences of ending DEI on college campuses in Texas

Texas A&M logo on the football field

"The absence of DEI offices and initiatives, particularly at predominantly white student-serving institutions like the flagship Texas A&M University at College Station, may result in decreased enrollment of students of color, veterans and LGBTQA+ students who will instead choose private or out-of-state universities that do offer DEI supports," writes Green.

Tim Warner/Getty Images

Green is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Florida and a member of

In the spring of 2023, Texas passed Senate Bill 17, known as the “anti-DEI law,'' prohibiting state-funded public colleges and universities from maintaining diversity, equity, and inclusion offices. Additionally, the law prohibits diversity training, soliciting DEI statements (signed commitments to uphold principles of inclusion) and use of “preferable treatment” based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in matters like hiring or financial aid.

Institutions across the state braced for impact as the law came into effect on Jan. 1: Any campus that state auditors found in violation would have 180 days to make amends or risk losing funding. The effects of Texas’ anti-DEI legislation will take time to come into view but, for now, students and their families along with everyone who benefits from public higher educational institutions deserve to know what DEI initiatives actually are, why some policymakers have turned against them and what campuses stand to lose from their elimination.

What do diversity, equity and inclusion offices do?

To fully understand the potential effects of the new law, Texans should first know the purpose and role of the DEI offices that have been abolished.

Broadly, campus DEI offices work to promote an environment that is diverse and equitable, without bias or discrimination. To secure these initiatives, many higher education institutions that have DEI offices “coordinate mentorships, tutoring, programs to boost the number of underrepresented groups in fields like science and engineering, and efforts to increase diversity among faculty.” DEI offices are also often tasked with ensuring higher ed institutions follow federal and state laws related to inclusion, discrimination, diversity, and fairness.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Examples from states across the political spectrum show the variety within campus DEI work: The University of Indiana Bloomington not only has specialized DEI leadership programs initiated by students and faculty, but also implements 14 different initiatives encompassing academic success, mental health and a variety of financial aid opportunities. Campuses such as the University of Michigan, University of Maryland and the University of Missouri provide resources for faculty to foster culturally sensitive dialogue in the classroom. The University of Kentucky DEI office builds and promotes organizations supporting first-generation, disabled and/or victimized students, as well as minority and LGBTQA+ students. Through DEI efforts, Boston University School of Medicine students worked to construct an anti-racism curriculum to ensure patients’ health equity.

Beliefs vs. reality

If the goal of DEI offices and initiatives is to create campuses that are more representative of their state populations and where Americans of all identities can equally see themselves as community members, then what are the arguments against their existence?

Some policymakers believe that this type of programming ironically restricts inclusion and promotes discrimination, possibly because it makes differences between identity groups more legible while seeking to rectify unequal educational outcomes across those groups. They also opine that the language and curricula used in some DEI initiatives and trainings teach “alternative narratives” of American history, and push the description of racism as not just an issue of interpersonal prejudice, but a built-in structural component of many U.S. systems and institutions (including higher education) that preserve benefits for white people at the expense of deserved gains for people of color.

But what does research say about the actual effects of campus DEI initiatives? DEI initiatives have promoted “fair and equal treatment of people…and address historical discrimination of certain groups.” And while public opinion on DEI work tends to focus on programming for people of color and LGBTQIA+ groups, those same offices work to aid all underrepresented groups on campus, including veterans and people with disabilities.

While data is limited on how DEI efforts affect academic outcomes, research has shown that college students value the community these initiatives facilitate. One study of undergraduate and graduate students found that 55 percent would consider transferring to another university if DEI initiatives were abolished at theirs, and 59 percent stated they would reconsider enrolling at a university that lacked DEI initiatives. Hanover Research found that 54 percent of surveyed college students feel singled out by their identity, creating a barrier to a sense of belonging. Particularly for first generation and minority students, a sense of belonging is attributed to greater enrollment retention, persistence levels, grade point averages, mental well-being and long-term physical health. A recent study found that students of color have higher graduation rates when taught by diverse faculty — whose retention remains low across the academy.

Taking away supports that foster belonging and retain faculty of color could reduce important gains: Data show that historically marginalized populations who obtain higher degrees are more likely to earn more and less likely to face unemployment and negative health issues.

What Senate Bill 17 could mean for Texas

Texas is the sixth most racially and ethnically diverse state in the nation, with the highest population of African Americans and the second highest of Hispanic/LatinX-identified people. This is reflected in Texas public universities and colleges, where Hispanic/LatinX students have the highest enrollment rates and African Americans the third highest.

However, while minority students have higher enrollment rates than their white counterparts, those white students have higher graduation rates — a key marker of educational success and a predictor of future economic security. The absence of DEI offices and initiatives, particularly at predominantly white student-serving institutions like the flagship Texas A&M University at College Station, may result in decreased enrollment of students of color, veterans and LGBTQA+ students who will instead choose private or out-of-state universities that do offer DEI supports. And many students who make this choice may be forced to take on higher amounts of student debt — or put off or be dissuaded from attending college altogether.

While current research is still forthcoming, evidence we do have supports the assumption that abolishing DEI programming will result in greater marginalization of minority student populations as well as staff and faculty. Overall, by passing and enforcing this legislation, Texas is further imperiling the success of its minority student populations — and those effects on the reputation of Texas public colleges and universities and the workforce development and civic engagement they support may follow.

Read More

People marching

Black Lives Matter protesters march in New York.

Ira L. Black - Corbis/Getty Images

Progress is won by pursuing justice, not waiting patiently in line

Agbo is the CEO of the Kataly Foundation and the managing director of the foundation’s Restorative Economies Fund.

It’s another election year. Another year when the stakes are sky high and the promise of our democracy is in peril. Another year when people — primarily people of color — are asked to put aside differences and come together to save our country.

What is the responsibility of philanthropy in yet another moment of political uncertainty?

Keep ReadingShow less
Fannie Lou Hamer

Fannie Lou Hamer testifies at the Democratic National Convention in 1964.

Bettmann/Getty Images

60 years later, it's time to restart the Freedom Summer

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

Sixty years have passed since Freedom Summer, that pivotal season of 1964 when hundreds of young activists descended upon an unforgiving landscape, driven by a fierce determination to shatter the chains of racial oppression. As our nation teeters on the precipice of another transformative moment, the echoes of that fateful summer reverberate across the years, reminding us that freedom remains an unfinished work.

At the heart of this struggle stood Fannie Lou Hamer, a sharecropper's daughter whose voice thundered like a prophet's in the wilderness, signaling injustice. Her story is one of unyielding defiance, of a spirit that the brutal lash of bigotry could not break. When Hamer testified before the Democratic National Convention in 1964, her words, laced with the pain of beatings and the fire of righteous indignation, laid bare the festering wound of racial terror that had long plagued our nation. Her resilience in the face of such adversity is a testament to the power of the human spirit.

Keep ReadingShow less
Male and female gender symbols
Hreni/Getty Images

The Montana Legislature tried, and failed, to define sex

Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

In 2023, the Montana State Legislature passed a bill, signed into law by the governor, that defined sex and sexuality as being either, and only, male or female. It defined “sex” in the following manner: “In human beings, there are exactly two sexes, male and female with two corresponding gametes.” The law listed some 41 sections of the Montana Code that need to be revised based on this definition.

Keep ReadingShow less
two Black people wrapped in an American flag
Raul Ortin/Getty Images

July Fourth: A bittersweet reminder of a dream deferred

Juste is a researcher at the Movement Advancement Project and author of the reportFreedom Under Fire: The Far Right's Battle to Control America.”

They’ll see how beautiful I am
And be ashamed—
I, too, am America.”
— Langston Hughes, I Too

On the Fourth of July we celebrated many things: our nation’s independence, our democracy and the opportunity to gather with loved ones who, ideally, embrace us for who we are. Yet, this same nation does not always make room for us to live freely for who we are, who we love, what we look like and how we pray. And it is this dissonance that renders the Fourth of July’s celebration a bittersweet reminder of a dream deferred for many of us.

Keep ReadingShow less
Campus building with university flag

University of Oklahoma

Oklahoma women robbed of critical resources, entry point into politics

Stacey is a political science professor and program coordinator for political science at Rose State College. Stacey is a member of Scholars Strategy Network.

The University of Oklahoma’s recent decision to shutter a longstanding program intended to encourage, empower and educate female Oklahoma college students to pursue civic and political service careers has deeply unsettled me.

I am upset by the abrupt end to this invaluable program, both as a 2007 alumna of the National Education for Women’s Leadership program and a political science professor who has written recommendation letters and successfully sent at least two students to the program in my last decade of teaching.

The Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center has coordinated and hosted the NEW Leadership program since its inception in 2002, making me one of the elder graduates of a program that is critical to fostering Oklahoma’s future female political leaders.

Keep ReadingShow less