Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Partisan accord on modernizing Indiana's campaign finance reporting

Indiana
JosephJacobs/Getty Images

Indiana legislators are finding unusual, if narrow, bipartisan agreement on money-in-politics regulation: allowing all Hoosier candidates to file their fundraising and spending reports online.

It sounds like a minor bookkeeping matter, but campaign finance watchdogs say such electronic filings produce more accurate and timely disclosures by politicians than when they're compelled to use pen and paper.


The Republican-majority General Assembly looks likely to pass legislation before adjourning in a month that would allow local candidates and campaign committees to file electronically, which the legislators themselves have been able to do for a few years. The House has already passed the measure and it won a rare 9-0 endorsement from the Senate Elections Committee on Monday.

It's "a reasonable ask" for counties "to move forward with technology," said the panel's GOP chairman, Greg Walker.

Currently, candidates file papers in person, through the mail or via fax machine — and their handwriting (especially the numbers) is often indecipherable. Another option is to fill in a PDF that is available on the state government's website, but it tends to not save properly and submits a report declaring the candidate did not raise or spend a penny.

The bill was pressed by Jessica Bailey, the new Democratic clerk in Porter County in the state's northwestern corner.

"It's something that's needed, and it will keep elections and candidate reports more transparent," she told the Post-Tribune of Northwest Indiana. "If things are simple and user friendly, people tend to do them on a regular basis."

Read More

A person in a military uniform holding a gavel.

As the Trump administration redefines “Warrior Ethos,” U.S. military leaders face a crucial test: defend democracy or follow unlawful orders.

Getty Images, Liudmila Chernetska

Warrior Ethos or Rule of Law? The Military’s Defining Moment

Does Secretary Hegseth’s extraordinary summoning of hundreds of U.S. command generals and admirals to a Sept. 30 meeting and the repugnant reinstatement of Medals of Honor to 20 participants in the infamous 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre—in which 300 Lakota Sioux men, women, and children were killed—foreshadow the imposition of a twisted approach to U.S. “Warrior Ethos”? Should military leaders accept an ethos that ignores the rule of law?

Active duty and retired officers must trumpet a resounding: NO, that is not acceptable. And, we civilians must realize the stakes and join them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us
Provided

Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us

In the rush to “dismantle the administrative state,” some insist that freeing people from “burdensome bureaucracy” will unleash thriving. Will it? Let’s look together.

A century ago, bureaucracy was minimal. The 1920s followed a worldwide pandemic that killed an estimated 17.4–50 million people. While the virus spread, the Great War raged; we can still picture the dehumanizing use of mustard gas and trench warfare. When the war ended, the Roaring Twenties erupted as an antidote to grief. Despite Prohibition, life was a party—until the crash of 1929. The 1930s opened with a global depression, record joblessness, homelessness, and hunger. Despair spread faster than the pandemic had.

Keep ReadingShow less