As we celebrate Juneteenth, Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson Jr., vice president of partnerships and programming for the Bridge Alliance, shares his thoughts on our nation's newest federal holiday in "Reflections on Juneteenth."
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More

Teen Vogue editors Kaitlyn McNab, left, and Aiyana Ishmael, right. Both were laid off as Condé Nast announced that Teen Vogue would be absorbed into the Vogue brand.
J. Countess, Phillip Faraone; Getty Images
Teen Vogue Changed How a Generation Saw Politics and Inclusion. That Era Could Be Over.
Nov 19, 2025
For the last decade, Teen Vogue has been an unexpected source of some of the most searing progressive political analysis in American media. It’s a pivot the publication began in April 2016 when Elaine Welteroth took over as leader. She became the publication’s second editor in chief, and the second Black person ever to hold that title under the publishing giant Condé Nast.
Previously focused mostly on teen style trends and celebrity red carpet looks, the magazine’s website soon included headlines like “Trauma From Slavery Can Actually Be Passed Down Through Your Genes” and “Donald Trump Is Gaslighting America.” Readers took notice: Between January 2016 and January 2017, web traffic reportedly grew from 2.9 million U.S. visitors to 7.9 million.
But that era could be over.
On November 3, Condé Nast announced that the Vogue brand would absorb Teen Vogue, resulting in the layoffs of at least six staffers, “most of whom are BIPOC women or trans” according to a statement released by the Condé Union.
Both in 2016 and now, the changes at Teen Vogue reflect a larger political and cultural moment taking place throughout the country. Eleven years ago, conversations about race, gender and systemic inequity began to take a more prominent place in media and politics, leading to an expansion of diversity in hiring and messaging across industries. But the journalists brought in to help build trust and strengthen credibility on anti-trans legislation, grassroots activism and more, are being pushed back toward the margins.
“It sucks that it always seems to come down to the most diverse people in the room being let go,” said Aiyana Ishmael, 27, who was laid off from her position as Teen Vogue’s style editor this month. She and culture editor Kaitlyn McNab say they were the last two Black women working full time on Teen Vogue’s editorial team. Now, they are both gone.
“It just shows that we still have so much work to do when it comes to actual longstanding progression of having diverse voices in newsrooms,” she said, adding: “It’s about who deserves to stay and who doesn’t? Who gets moved around to another sector, and who do you choose to just throw away?”
Newsroom restructuring at major broadcast networks has led to the cancellation of shows this year with women of color anchors, including “The ReidOut with Joy Reid” and “Alex Wagner Tonight.” Last month, NBC cut its identity-focused platforms NBC BLK, NBC Latino, NBC Asian America and NBC Out — teams that were all led by women.
Aiyana Ishmael interviews singer Tanner Adell onstage at the 2025 Teen Vogue Summit in Los Angeles. (Anna Webber/Getty Images for Teen Vogue)
There are no specific figures tracking journalism job losses among women of color; however, one survey published by the Institute for Independent Journalists found that while women represent 46 percent of the journalism workforce, they comprised 68 percent of respondents who experienced layoffs or buyouts between 2022 and 2024. Separately, 42 percent of survey respondents who experienced a buyout or layoff were people of color, though they make up about 17 percent of the journalism industry.
Reporter Hanaa’ Tameez with the Nieman Journalism Lab analyzed 169 full-time journalism jobs related to race, diversity, and equality that were posted and filled between June 2020 and December 2024. As of summer 2025, 34 percent of these positions have been eliminated.
While the news industry has long experienced financial challenges in the digital media era, the idea that journalists of color and queer journalists are simply the collateral damage of these financial trends “is an excuse that never rings right to me,” said Dr. Sherri Williams, an associate professor of journalism at American University who researches race in media and communications.
“This is really justification for newsrooms to stop doing what they never really wanted to do in the first place,” Williams said.
The news of Teen Vogue layoffs came as a complete shock to Ishmael. For her and several others she worked with, Teen Vogue was their first full-time job in journalism.
She was 18 when Teen Vogue began its transition to more inclusive and political coverage. Growing up as a tall, dark-skinned, plus-size Black woman in Florida, she did not see many women who looked like her on the pages of glossy magazines or fashion blogs.
“Usually I was very invisible, made fun of, not the one that people saw as this interesting and cool person,” Ishmael said. That reality took a turn for the better after she landed her “first big-girl job,” at Teen Vogue four years ago. Ishmael started as an editorial assistant and worked her way up to an associate editor position before being promoted to the publication’s style editor this October, just weeks before she was laid off.
But Ishmael made her mark on the organization. She created a viral series CTRL+C, replicating the style of celebrities like Zendaya and Dua Lipa for plus-size bodies. She successfully pitched putting Olympic gymnast Jordan Chiles on the July 2024 digital cover, and star Louisiana State University basketball player Flau’jae Johnson on September 2025 digital cover.
Ishmael’s North Star in this work has been to stay true to herself and her values, inspired by Welteroth’s legacy. But as time went on, Ishmael said she started to see the numbers of Black women on the editorial staff dwindle, until only she and McNab remained.
“I think in general, you just get sad, not specifically at Teen Vogue, but Condé Nast-wide. We have so many group chats between all the Black staffers and then smaller groups of cohorts. We really stuck together,” Ishmael said. “Condé Nast-wide we’ve seen in the last couple of years, Black women leaving and Black people in general leaving.”
In interviews, Welteroth explained that when she and her team took over, they wanted to better represent the diverse perspectives and interests of teens and young adults.
“There are stereotypes that exist, unfortunately, particularly around young people and young girls, and I think we need to do the work to break those stereotypes down,” Welteroth told NPR in 2019.
“The day that article — ‘Trump is Gaslighting America’ — was published, we sold, in that month, more copies of the magazine than we had that entire year,” she continued. “And that trend continued because Teen Vogue emerged as the voice of a new generation of politically engaged, socially conscious young people. And the world just wasn’t ready.”
When Welteroth took the helm in 2016, the Black Lives Matter movement was bringing renewed attention to police brutality and systemic racism in the criminal legal system. President Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign stoked preexisting racial anxieties by characterizing Brown and Black undocumented immigrants as “murderers” and “rapists,” and Black Lives Matter protesters as “thugs.”
To meet this moment, newsrooms expanded identity-related coverage between 2015 and 2022, particularly in the nonprofit news space. In addition to legacy newsrooms like the Associated Press, The Washington Post and USA Today hiring more race and identity specific reporters, new nonprofits like Prism, MLK 50, Scalawag Magazine, Capital B, The Emancipator, TransLash, El Tímpano — and The 19th — were founded with missions to report on marginalized communities. Of those eight nonprofits, all were founded or led by women, seven by women of color, five by Black women.
Nonprofit news organizations whose primary mission is serving communities of color nearly doubled from 26 to 50 organizations between 2017 and 2021, according to the Institute for Nonprofit News.
While not a nonprofit, Teen Vogue played a role in paving the way for more diversity, both through its content and its hiring behind the scenes, Williams said. The publication gave dozens of young writers from diverse backgrounds their first major bylines. In 2021, for example, Williams partnered with Teen Vogue to publish five stories written by her students marking the anniversary of George Floyd’s killing by a police officer in Minneapolis and how it sparked national protests and a so-called “racial reckoning.”
“What I think Teen Vogue showed the rest of the industry is that there is an appetite for these stories. People are actually interested in these stories,” she said. Williams noted that Welteroth got her start in journalism at Ebony Magazine, a women’s publication previously owned by the Johnson Publishing Company, which played a prominent role in documenting the Civil Rights Movement and brutality against Black people.
“I think of everything that’s happening right now in this time: corporate media is failing us, but ethnic media, queer media, women’s media is not,” Williams continued. “So, what I think that Elaine did is she took some of those sensibilities from Black media and applied it to Teen Vogue, centering marginalized people and groups and really amplifying their concerns and addressing them in a substantive way that was bold and fearless.”
Welteroth’s team did not get back to The 19th’s request for an interview, but in previous interviews she has stated that during her time at Ebony she “learned how to lift up the underdog and be the underdog.” She left Teen Vogue in 2018, and the publication’s second Black woman editor, Lindsay Peoples, took over until 2021.
In a statement posted to Teen Vogue’s social media accounts on Tuesday, the publication said, “Our mission remains the same: to offer a critical and distinctive point of view about the things that spark passion and purpose among young people today.” It’s unclear if and how the staffing changes will affect Teen Vogue’s coverage, but Ishmael and Williams both emphasized that layoffs affecting journalists of color, LGBTQ+ journalists and women journalists extend beyond one publication.
Diverse journalism roles were already on the decline prior to Trump’s second term. But the current administration’s crackdown on hiring and practices that promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) has given a green light for restrictions across industries. Nationwide, workers of color, particularly Black women, bear the brunt of job losses in 2025. In the first three months this year, an estimated 300,000 Black women lost jobs.
When places like Teen Vogue, NBC, CBS and beyond lose racial and gender diversity on their staff, they lose the ability to not only elevate stories from the Black community, for example, but they also lose the ability to capture nuances and perspectives from different Black communities, Ishmael said.
Williams said that the audience will lose out on relevant context “that helps us understand why we are where we are in our society.” There may be stories of inequality that get missed, she added, but she encourages them to be strategic by supporting the outlets that remain.
“Now it is just time for the audience — the readership — to really put its money where its mouth is,” Williams said. “Really get serious about trying to maintain the media that is still around that has a commitment for centering communities that are never going to get the kind of coverage that they deserve.”
Candice Norwood is a reporter for The 19th who covers general assignment news.
Teen Vogue Changed How a Generation Saw Politics and Inclusion. That Era Could Be Over. was originally published by The 19th and is republished with permission.
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended

U.S. President Donald Trump alights from Air Force One upon arrival at Haneda Airport in Tokyo on Oct. 27, 2025.
(Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images/TCA)
Donald Trump isn’t joking about a third term
Nov 19, 2025
Believe him.
Almost a year ago to the day, The New York Times ran a special editorial just before Donald Trump would win the presidency again.
They used a full page to print out in giant, boldface, all-caps the following missive:
“Donald Trump says he will prosecute his enemies, order mass deportations, use soldiers against citizens, abandon allies, and play politics with disasters. Believe him.”
It was good advice, as we know a lot of what he was promising to do has already happened.
We saw much of it outlined in Project 2025, a blueprint published by the conservative Heritage Foundation, to reshape the federal government and consolidate executive power around Trump.
Despite denying any involvement in the project, Trump has seemingly used it as a literal roadmap to help avoid the parts of his first administration where he was thwarted by pesky inconveniences like the Constitution, the law, and separation of powers.
A community-driven Project 2025 tracker found that of the 319 objectives outlined in the initiative, Trump’s already made good on 121, including using government contracts to “push back against woke policies” in corporate America, rescinding Biden-era Title IX rules that strengthened the ability to prosecute sexual assault and discrimination cases, and turning back former Attorney General Merrick Garland’s policy that limited DOJ’s ability to subpoena journalists during leak investigations, to name just a few.
But he also blatantly told Americans what he was going to do at his rallies. These weren’t empty threats. They weren’t trial balloons so he could poll-test their popularity. They were promises.
One in particular seems to be motivating many of his decisions: “I will be your retribution.”
Just five days after the Times editorial was published, Trump sued CBS News for its interview of former Vice President Kamala Harris. A month after he won reelection he sued the Des Moines Register over a poll he didn’t like.
He’s already prosecuted former FBI Director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and former National Security Advisor John Bolton. He’s actively investigating other critics, including Sen. Adam Schiff, former Special Counsel Jack Smith, and former DHS official Miles Taylor.
And as we’ve all seen, he’s ordered mass deportations. He’s used soldiers against U.S. citizens. He’s abandoned allies. He’s played politics with disasters.
And yet, there are still apparently people who think he’s bluffing when he says he’d run for a third term.
Trump’s been teasing the idea for months. He makes it sound a little like he’s joking, but we’ve seen this movie before. He “joked” about not leaving the White House in 2020, too — and we all know what happened on Jan. 6. It’s always just a joke, until it isn’t.
Speaker Mike Johnson, ever Trump’s loyal lackey, has laughed it off as mere “trolling,” and has said he’s talked to the president about the constitutional constrictions of such a move — as if that’s ever been a compelling consideration for Trump.
Former Ohio governor and former presidential candidate John Kasich also brushed it off on MSNBC:
“No! Listen, have we had any states try to move to call a convention to change the amendment? Have we had any Republican governors do that? They’re not even going to answer a question like that because it’s not going to happen.”
Oh, the hubris. Trump has broken every norm, and he’s already violated the Constitution dozens of times. Anyone who believes Trump lives within existing boundaries, either of legality or decency, hasn’t been paying attention.
And counter to Kasich’s beliefs, Trump’s already got accomplices in both chambers of Congress willing to help him.
Rep. Randy Fine called for repealing the 22nd Amendment, which limits presidential terms to two, earlier this month.
Sen. Tommy Tuberville says it’s Trump’s call to make:
“If you read the Constitution, it says it’s not [possible],” said Tuberville. “But if [Trump] says he has some different circumstances that might be able to go around the Constitution, but that’s up to him.”
This isn’t a troll or a joke. Just listen to Steve Bannon, the architect of Trump’s first campaign:
“Well, he’s going to get a third term. So, Trump ’28. Trump is going to be president in ’28 and people ought to just get accommodated with that. There’s many different alternatives. At the appropriate time, we’ll lay out what the plan is.”
They have a plan. They’ll lay it out. This isn’t childish wishcasting or manifesting.
Bannon and Trump are designing it. They’re planning it. I’d bet they’re talking to lawyers and constitutional experts, and to the people they will need to help them do it at every level of government.
If we’ve learned one thing about Trump in all these years, it’s that we should believe him.
S.E. Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.
Keep ReadingShow less

Epstein abuse survivor Haley Robson (C) reacts alongside Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) (R) as the family of Virginia Giuffre speaks during a news conference with lawmakers on the Epstein Files Transparency Act outside the U.S. Capitol on November 18, 2025 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Break With Trump Over Epstein Files Is a Test of GOP Conscience
Nov 18, 2025
Today, the House of Representatives is voting on the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a bill that would compel the Justice Department to release unclassified records related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. For months, the measure languished in procedural limbo. Now, thanks to a discharge petition signed by Democrats and a handful of Republicans, the vote is finally happening.
But the real story is not simply about transparency. It is about political courage—and the cost of breaking ranks with Donald Trump.
This morning, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene stood with accusers of Epstein’s abuse, declaring her loyalty not to Trump, but to the women whose lives were shattered by Epstein’s trafficking network. “I was called a traitor by a man that I fought for six years,” she said, referring to Trump. “I unapologetically and proudly stand with these women.”
Greene’s words matter because they pierce the mythology of Trump’s dominance over the Republican Party. For years, she was one of his fiercest defenders. Yet here she was, rejecting his demand that she withdraw her support for the bill. Her defiance is a reminder that even in the MAGA movement, loyalty has limits when justice is at stake.
The accusers themselves framed the issue in stark terms. Haley Robson said, "It's time that we put the political agendas and party affiliations to the side," CBS reported. "This is not an issue of a few corrupt Democrats or a few corrupt Republicans; this is a case of institutional betrayal," said Annie Farmer. And Liz Stein said, "The Epstein files are not about loyalty to any one political party. They're evidence of a crime."
Their testimony underscores the significance of Greene’s stand. By siding with them, she elevated their voices above partisan calculation. In doing so, she forced her party to confront a question it often avoids: Does loyalty to Trump outweigh loyalty to truth?
Trump’s initial opposition to the bill was a political blunder. Branding it a “Democrat hoax,” he underestimated the bipartisan appetite for transparency. His attacks on Greene—calling her “Marjorie Traitor Greene”—only deepened the perception that he was protecting powerful interests rather than victims.
Under pressure, Trump reversed course and urged Republicans to support the bill. But the damage was done. Greene’s refusal to bend revealed cracks in his grip on the GOP. Her words—“It really makes you wonder what is in those files and who and what country is putting so much pressure on him”—hinted at suspicions that transcend party politics.
The Epstein files vote is a test of whether Congress will prioritize transparency over secrecy, victims over elites, and conscience over loyalty. Greene’s stand shows that even Trump’s most ardent allies can choose principle over politics.
For Republicans, the choice is stark: follow Trump’s shifting whims, or follow Greene’s example by standing with accusers. For Democrats, the moment is an opportunity to demonstrate that bipartisan cooperation is possible when the stakes are moral rather than partisan.
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s break with Trump is not just a personal feud. It is a turning point in the GOP’s reckoning with power, secrecy, and accountability. She reframed the debate: this is not about Trump or party advantage. It is about whether America dares to confront the truth, no matter how uncomfortable.
Today’s vote will decide more than the fate of a bill. It will determine whether Congress is willing to honor the voices of survivors and prove that justice is not subordinate to political loyalty.
Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.
Keep ReadingShow less

A deep dive into ongoing threats to U.S. democracy—from MAGA election interference and state voting restrictions to filibuster risks—as America approaches 2026 and 2028.
Getty Images, SDI Productions
MAGA Gerrymandering, Pardons, Executive Actions Signal Heightened 2026 Voting Rights Threats
Nov 18, 2025
Tuesday, November 4, demonstrated again that Americans want democracy and US elections are conducted credibly. Voter turnout was strong; there were few administrative glitches, but voters’ choices were honored.
The relatively smooth elections across the country nonetheless took place despite electiondenial and anti-voting efforts continuing through election day. These efforts will likely intensify as we move toward the 2026 midterms and 2028 presidential election. The MAGA drive for unprecedented mid-decade, extreme political gerrymandering of congressional districts to guarantee their control of the House of Representatives is a conspicuous thrust of their campaign to remain in power at all costs.
The White House’s promise that yet another Presidential order on elections will soon be issued also indicates that the MAGA campaign against voting rights remains a central priority. The next order is likely to focus on stifling voting by mail and requiring hand counting of ballots, among other matters. That will be on top of the extraordinarily overreaching March 25 Presidential Executive Order (EO 14248) and other actions affecting elections.
Trump’s “full, complete and unconditional” pardon on November 7 of “all American citizens” for their conduct in creating fake slates of Electoral College delegates in the 2020 presidential election conspiracy – as well as anyone’s efforts to expose "voting fraud and vulnerabilities” in that election is blanket impunity and encouragement for supporters to falsely reject MAGA losses in 2026 and 2028. Taken together with Trump’s pardon of approximately 1,500 January 6 rioters , the warning is clear.
The call to eliminate the Senate’s filibuster rule is a dramatic threat to genuine elections.
President Trump emphasized to Republican Senators on November 5 that eliminating the filibuster is a goal beyond ending the government shutdown. He told them: “[T]he biggest thing is the filibuster,” adding that after its elimination, “We will pass legislation at levels you've never seen before, and it will be impossible to beat us.” That fits with his infamous quote to supporters that “we’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not going to have to vote.”
Abolishing the filibuster would open the floodgates to passage of draconian laws regulating the “times, places and manner” of holding federal elections. Under the cover of that phrase from the Constitution’s Election Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1) Congress could implement extreme measures without the challenges facing presidential orders, and MAGA members of the House are promoting further voting rights restrictions that are in tune with White House’s election overreach.
There are significant reasons for both parties to keep the filibuster, and the proposed government funding deal postpones the immediate issue until January 30. In the meantime, something that everyone can do is contact Republican Senators, urging them to preserve the filibuster.
State legislation is another MAGA arena for undermining free and fair elections.
According to a recent Brennan Center report, as of early October, 16 states enacted 29 restrictive voting laws, which is on par with 2021’s record-setting numbers (32 laws in 17 states). Of course, 2021 measures were driven by false claims about the 2020 election being stolen. As the 2026 and 2028 national tests of whether the MAGA movement can retain federal power come into focus, legislative changes of election law at the state level will also likely further intensify.
That highlights the importance of monitoring proposed state legislation and mobilizing to protect credible elections.
The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security are further weaponizing against voting and honest election administration.
The MAGA top-down, bottom-up approach to subverting credible elections is revealed by the recent addition to key positions in the Department of Justice and at Homeland Security of more 2020 election credibility deniers, bridging institutional and grassroots mobilization.
The DOJ’s sweeping efforts to gather state voter lists, despite privacy concerns, foreshadows creation of a spurious, de facto national voter registry, countering the states’ electoral authority. Public confidence in voting systems technology, challenged by certification provisions of EO 14248, could face further subversion under the guise of decertifying voting systems.
Election system cyber security and general safety of election workers is being undermined as the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) turns away from assisting election administration. Yet, artificial intelligence challenges and human threats are both serious threats. The Brennan Center reports that CISA may even become a source of misinformation on election security, which places pressure on states to develop mutual assistance measures to enhance election security,
The toxic political environment in the US is likely to intensify as the 2026 and 2028 elections approach. Potentials for political violence, unfortunately, may not diminish, and threats against election workers as well as judges, who are essential to credibly resolving electoral related legal disputes, will continue. Citizens who are committed to credible elections should step forward and volunteer as election workers to help address high election worker turnover. And, efforts by groups like the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) and the Article III Coalition will be all the more important.
As the mid-terms and presidential elections approach, each of us will face the challenge of finding accurate information to make informed political choices and to defend credible elections. We also will have to decide how to use our voices, donate our time, and provide financial support that we can afford to protect elections and safeguard democracy.
Publications, including Democracy Docket, Election Law Blog, and VoteBeat, shed light on challenges to credible elections and efforts to combat threats. Organizations that defend credible elections through the courts deserve support, like Democracy Forward, ACLU, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Public Citizen, as do groups like VoteRiders and others focused on voter registration and mobilization. Nonetheless, supporting candidates and parties whose policies and actions advance American democracy is the key to its defense.
Credible elections are the means of ensuring that our democracy can be preserved and advanced, while our participation is its prerequisite.
Pat Merloe provides strategic advice to groups focused on democracy and trustworthy elections in the U.S. and internationally. He has engaged with election monitors and democracy advocates in 65 countries.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More
















