Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Large bipartisan majority approves U.S. military aid to Ukraine

Majority opposes urging Ukraine to enter peace negotiations before Russia commits to withdrawing forces

Large bipartisan majority approves U.S. military aid to Ukraine
Getty Images

Kull is Program Director of the Program for Public Consultation.

A bipartisan majority of seven-in-ten voters favor the U.S. continuing to provide significant military aid to Ukraine to help in their ongoing war with Russia, according to an in-depth study by the Program for Public Consultation together with the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy.


Continuing to provide military aid to Ukraine, including military equipment, ammunition, training and intelligence, was favored by 69%, including 55% of Republicans, 87% of Democrats and 58% of independents. The sample was large enough to enable analysis of attitudes in very Republican and very Democratic districts based on Cook PVI ratings. In both very red and very blue congressional districts, equally large majorities (71%) favored continuing military aid.

The public consultation survey of 2,445 registered voters ensured that respondents understood the issues by first providing a briefing on the history of Ukraine-Russia relations, the events and circumstances leading up to the 2022 invasion, and the current state of the war. They were presented several proposals in detail, and evaluated arguments for and against each before making their final recommendation. The content was reviewed by experts from each side of the debates, to ensure that the briefing was accurate and balanced and that the arguments presented were the strongest ones being made.

Ukraine’s stance has been that it will not start negotiations until Russia first commits to withdraw all its forces from Ukraine. Some Members of Congress and foreign policy leaders have proposed that the U.S. pressure Ukraine to start peace negotiations without this precondition.

When informed about the situation and asked whether the U.S. should “encourage” Ukraine to enter into negotiations, “whether or not Russia first commits to withdraw from all of Ukraine,” 56% said the U.S. should not, including 68% of Democrats and 53% of Independents, but less than half of Republicans (47%).

Recently the Biden administration shifted its position on US fighter jets, allowing NATO allies to send U.S.-made jets to Ukraine, with the U.S. training Ukrainian pilots to operate these jets. A bipartisan majority of 73% approved of this move, including 63% of Republicans, 86% of Democrats, and 64% of independents.

Respondents evaluated arguments for and against continuing military aid, the full text of which can be found in the Questionnaire. The strongest argument was that the U.S. has a duty to help counter Russia’s violation of international law by assisting Ukraine, which was found convincing by 83% (Republicans 76%, Democrats 92%, independents 78%). Close behind was the argument that it is important for U.S. security that Russia does not gain a foothold in Europe, because if they attack a NATO member it would trigger an all-out war (78% convincing, Republicans 70%, Democrats 88%, independents 73%).

The arguments against were found convincing by approximately half of respondents. Majorities of Republicans found them convincing but less than the majorities of Republicans that found the pro arguments convincing. The argument that U.S. involvement risks escalation to nuclear conflict with Russia was found convincing by 46% (Republicans 55%, Democrats 33%, independents 58%). The argument that Europe is perfectly capable of handling the problem itself and that this conflict isn’t going to collapse the world order was found convincing by 52% (Republicans 63%, Democrats 36%, independents 63%).

“Overwhelming bipartisan majorities of Americans agree that it is critical for the U.S. to help uphold the international law against cross-border aggression, even in the face of the risk of escalating to nuclear war,” commented Steven Kull, director of PPC. “While Republicans and independents are responsive to the arguments that the Europeans should take care of the problem, and that the nuclear risks are high, in the end they come out in favor of U.S. involvement.”

Respondents were also asked about the U.S. providing humanitarian aid, including food, shelter and funds for critical infrastructure repair. A bipartisan eight-in-ten were in favor, including 92% of Democrats, 72% of Republicans and 73% of independents.

The survey was fielded online June 15-28, 2023 with a probability-based national sample of 2,445 registered voters provided by Nielsen Scarborough from its larger sample, which is recruited by telephone and mail from a random sample of households. The margin of error is +/- 2%.

The full report can be found here.


Read More

Has Deception Become America’s Currency of Power?
white red and blue textile

Has Deception Become America’s Currency of Power?

The most dangerous currency in American politics today isn’t money — it’s deception. It buys loyalty, distorts reality, and reshapes institutions long before citizens realize the damage. My father had a simple way of warning me to guard against that kind of influence: “Don’t take any wooden nickels.” He wanted me to recognize when someone was lying, conning, or dressing something up to look like value when it wasn’t. I never imagined that my childhood warning would become a civic alarm in my adult life, but it has. For years, politicians have handed Americans political wooden nickels — promises polished to look like truth — and the damage those deceptions have caused is now painfully clear.

In this administration, deception circulates like currency — traded, exchanged, and used to purchase influence, loyalty, and time. It is not merely a habit; it has become a governing strategy — a set of tactics used to acquire power, protect it, and bend institutions to its will. .

Keep ReadingShow less
The Rising Legacy of Latinas in America’s Armed Forces

Female U.S. soldier wearing 2023 OCP uniform saluting in front of american flag

Getty Images

The Rising Legacy of Latinas in America’s Armed Forces

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico —Visitors still pause at the white marble headstone of SPC Frances Marie Vega at the Puerto Rico National Cemetery. The 20‑year‑old soldier was the first female service member of Puerto Rican descent to die in combat during the Iraq War. Her legacy, once known mostly within military circles, has become a powerful symbol of the growing contributions and sacrifices of Latinas in the U.S. Armed Forces.

Vega was aboard a CH‑47 Chinook helicopter when it was hit by a surface‑to‑air missile near Fallujah on November 2, 2003, killing 16 soldiers. The shoot‑down became one of the deadliest single incidents for U.S. forces in the early stages of the Iraq War.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman standing in the middle of a food pantry filled with canned and boxed goods and toiletries.

Martha Molina has worked at the Flowing Wells Family Resource Center for 27 years. As its coordinator, she says the center serves about 50 families a month and gives our 160 food boxes. The center is open 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday - Friday. / Martha Molina ha trabajado en el Centro de Recursos Familiares de Flowing Wells durante 27 años. Como coordinadora, dice que el centro atiende a unas 50 familias al mes y entrega 160 cajas de alimentos. El centro está abierto de lunes a viernes, de 8 a.m. a 3 p.m.

Shannon Conner

“The Alarm Bell”: Arizona’s Drop in SNAP Participation Signals Potential Nationwide Impact of Trump Legislation

More than 400,000 Arizonans have lost their SNAP benefits since July — the largest decline in the nation by a wide margin — as an underfunded state agency administered changes called for in President Donald Trump’s so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

The drop represents nearly 47% of the state’s participants in the program better known as food stamps and includes about 180,000 children, according to the Arizona Department of Economic Security, which administers the program.

Keep ReadingShow less
PG&E’s Poor Track Record Shows How California Leaders Failed Consumers
silhouette of electric post during sunset

PG&E’s Poor Track Record Shows How California Leaders Failed Consumers

“Hello, I would like to talk with someone at your company about the large increase in my electric bill.”

So started my surreal conversation with a Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) representative. I had noticed that the amount I was paying monthly for electricity had suddenly jumped up, once again, after PG&E launched a new method of “billing.”

Keep ReadingShow less