Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A partisan Congress can still do some legislating

U.S. Capitol; filibuster
Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

In one of the most narrowly divided Congresses in recent history, as party loyalty and the filibuster are often key determinants of legislative outcomes, common sense tells us not to expect much production from our lawmakers.

But we would be wrong.

According to data compiled by the Pew Research Center, the current Senate has taken the second fewest cloture votes on legislation since 2005-06 (with an unusually high rate of success) and this Congress is on pace to pass more legislation than most of its predecessors over the past decade.


Congress has received some unusually positive publicity in recent months for passing a series of laws with bipartisan support, including an infrastructure package, a bill providing new health benefits for veterans, and a gun violence bill. While those bills deserve to get the headlines, the numbers show progress on much more.

Pew gathered data on the number of bills passed through August of the second year of each Congress’ two-year term. Pew further broke the totals down into “substantive” bills (such as spending and policy-setting measures) and “ceremonial” bills that honor individuals, groups or organizations.

The 117th Congress has passed 129 such substantive bills so far, up from 123 in 2019-20. Only the 114th (2015-16) and 115th (2017-18) Congresses passed more in the past dozen years. Republicans controlled both chambers during those four years, with comfortable margins in the House.

Laws enacted by Congress, through August of second year of term

While the House can pass legislation with a simple majority vote, things are more complicated in the Senate. Yes, the Senate also passes legislation by majority, but the minority party – or even an individual senator – has the power to slow the process and even prevent passage of policy measures through the filibuster.

Before the Senate can vote on a bill, it must first vote to end debate on the measure (known as “cloture”). That motion requires 60 “yes” votes. In theory, lawmakers seeking to prevent cloture must keep speaking through the debate, but the Senate has evolved in a way that allows for a silent filibuster, in which the mere threat is enough to block passage.

The filibuster has been prominently used in the past few years to block legislation intended to establish national standards for election: the For the People Act, and the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and the Freedom to Vote, which merged elements of the other two after they were blocked.

So far in the current Congress, the Senate has taken 40 cloture votes – one more than the 115th (2017-18). The last time there were so few cloture votes was 2003-05, which featured 26 such votes. Among the 40 votes, 25 (or 63 percent) were successful in ending debate and advancing to a final vote. That success rate is the fourth highest in the past 16 Congresses.

Number of cloture votes on legislation and their outcomes, by congressional term


Read More

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

A woman sifts through the rubble in her house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

This question is not an exercise in double-talk. It is critical to understand the power that our Constitution grants exclusively to Congress, and the power that resides in the President as Commander-in-Chief of the military.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not have that power. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 recognizes that distribution of power by saying that a President can only introduce military force into an existing or imminent hostility if Congress has declared war or specifically authorized the President to use military force, or there is a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less
Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less