Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A partisan Congress can still do some legislating

U.S. Capitol; filibuster
Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

In one of the most narrowly divided Congresses in recent history, as party loyalty and the filibuster are often key determinants of legislative outcomes, common sense tells us not to expect much production from our lawmakers.

But we would be wrong.

According to data compiled by the Pew Research Center, the current Senate has taken the second fewest cloture votes on legislation since 2005-06 (with an unusually high rate of success) and this Congress is on pace to pass more legislation than most of its predecessors over the past decade.


Congress has received some unusually positive publicity in recent months for passing a series of laws with bipartisan support, including an infrastructure package, a bill providing new health benefits for veterans, and a gun violence bill. While those bills deserve to get the headlines, the numbers show progress on much more.

Pew gathered data on the number of bills passed through August of the second year of each Congress’ two-year term. Pew further broke the totals down into “substantive” bills (such as spending and policy-setting measures) and “ceremonial” bills that honor individuals, groups or organizations.

The 117th Congress has passed 129 such substantive bills so far, up from 123 in 2019-20. Only the 114th (2015-16) and 115th (2017-18) Congresses passed more in the past dozen years. Republicans controlled both chambers during those four years, with comfortable margins in the House.

Laws enacted by Congress, through August of second year of term

While the House can pass legislation with a simple majority vote, things are more complicated in the Senate. Yes, the Senate also passes legislation by majority, but the minority party – or even an individual senator – has the power to slow the process and even prevent passage of policy measures through the filibuster.

Before the Senate can vote on a bill, it must first vote to end debate on the measure (known as “cloture”). That motion requires 60 “yes” votes. In theory, lawmakers seeking to prevent cloture must keep speaking through the debate, but the Senate has evolved in a way that allows for a silent filibuster, in which the mere threat is enough to block passage.

The filibuster has been prominently used in the past few years to block legislation intended to establish national standards for election: the For the People Act, and the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and the Freedom to Vote, which merged elements of the other two after they were blocked.

So far in the current Congress, the Senate has taken 40 cloture votes – one more than the 115th (2017-18). The last time there were so few cloture votes was 2003-05, which featured 26 such votes. Among the 40 votes, 25 (or 63 percent) were successful in ending debate and advancing to a final vote. That success rate is the fourth highest in the past 16 Congresses.

Number of cloture votes on legislation and their outcomes, by congressional term


Read More

The Food Was Terrible and Such Small Portions
white concrete dome building under blue sky during daytime

The Food Was Terrible and Such Small Portions

You may recognize the title of this post as the punchline to a joke that originated in the 1920s. It’s an apt description of how the House Republicans are currently operating. They complain loudly and publicly about bills and … then they vote for them anyway.

But a few bills came to the floor and passed with little controversy, including one which will become law:

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of a person on their phone at night.

From “Patriot Games” to The Hunger Games, how spectacle, social media, and political culture risk normalizing violence and eroding empathy.

Getty Images, Westend61

The Capitol Is Counting on Us to Laugh

When the Trump administration announced the Patriot Games, many people laughed. Selecting two children per state for a nationally televised sports competition looked too much like Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games to take seriously. But that instinct, to laugh rather than look closer, is one the Capitol is counting on. It has always been easier to normalize violence when it arrives dressed as entertainment or patriotism.

Here’s what I mean: The Hunger Games starts with the reaping, the moment when a Capitol official selects two children, one boy and one girl, to fight to the death against tributes from every other district. The games were created as an annual reminder of a failed rebellion, to remind the districts that dissent has consequences. At first, many Capitol residents saw the games as a just punishment. But sentiments shifted as the spectacle grew—when citizens could bet on winners, when a death march transformed into a beauty pageant, when murder became a pathway to celebrity.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latin America in Israel: A Diaspora Tested by Conflict
a close up of two people holding hands
Photo by Saulo Meza on Unsplash

Latin America in Israel: A Diaspora Tested by Conflict

Amid the political and military standoff among the United States, Israel, and Iran, it is civilians — the people with no say in these decisions — who bear the fear, disruption, and uncertainty of every strike and escalation. This week, The Fulcrum’s executive editor, Hugo Balta, reports from Israel with a single aim: to humanize the war by focusing not on the spectacle of Operation Epic Fury, but on the ordinary lives being reshaped by it.

JERUSALEM — In the heart of Jerusalem, and in Tel Aviv’s bustling Carmel Market, the sound of Spanish often mingles with the call to prayer, the chatter of vendors, and the hum of daily life. These are two of the most visible crossroads of Israel’s Latino diaspora — a community of more than 100,000 people whose presence is increasingly felt, even as many remain socially or legally invisible.

Keep ReadingShow less
Technology and Presidential Election

Anthropic’s Mythos AI raises alarms about surveillance, deepfakes, and democracy. Why urgent AI regulation is needed as U.S. policy struggles to keep pace.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

How the Latest in AI Threatens Democracy

On April 24, America got a wake-up call from Anthropic, one of the nation’s leading artificial intelligence companies. It announced a new AI tool, called Mythos, that can identify flaws in computer networks and software systems that, as Politico puts it, “Even the brightest human minds have been unable to identify.”

A machine smarter than the “brightest human minds” sounds like a line from a dystopian science fiction movie. And if that weren’t scary enough, we now have a government populated by people who seem oblivious to the risks AI poses to democracy and humanity itself.

Keep ReadingShow less