Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Lyft to provide free and discounted rides to the polls, starting in Iowa

Lyft car
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Expecting you'll need a ride to your polling place this year? Calling a Lyft could be your best bet.

The ride-sharing company is offering free and discounted drives to polling stations across the country throughout the primary season and on Election Day nine months from now. The offer starts Monday in Iowa, when thousands of Democrats are required to venture out on a winter's night to participate in the first presidential caucuses.

The company is partnering with five national nonprofits to provide rides: the League of Women Voters, National Federation of the Blind, Student Veterans of America, National Urban League and Voto Latino Foundation. Those groups will distribute the discounted rides to people in their networks they identify as being most in need.


Lyft made a more modest contribution to boosting turnout during the 2018 midterm election.

The expectation is that younger voters, who are more familiar with the concept of hailing a taxi online, will make disproportionate use of the new offer.

In the 2016 presidential election, nearly 6 million voters younger than 29 were registered but did not cast ballots. A Tufts University study of the barriers young adults face in getting to the ballot box found that young people of color and without any college education were particularly likely to cite lack of access to transportation as the reason.

While Lyft did not say how much it will spend subsidizing civic engagement, more information about the new initiative is expected in the coming months. Expanding access to the polls is part of a larger LyftUp initiative that provides rides during natural disasters and to grocery stores and job interviews.


Read More

Hand placing VOTE sticker on shirt

Hand placing VOTE sticker on shirt

Photo provided

The Latino Vote Keeps Changing. Why Do We Keep Calling It a Realignment?

After the 2024 presidential election, the headlines suggested that Latino voters were moving toward the Republican Party. Donald Trump’s gains were interpreted as evidence of a possible political realignment, particularly among working-class Latino voters and younger men.

Two years later, the story has reversed. Latino voters, we are told, are returning to the Democrats.

Keep ReadingShow less
President Donald Trump and Stephen Miller

President Donald Trump departs a roundtable discussion on cybercrime with White House Deputy Chief of Staff and Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller (R) in the East Room of the White House on October 21, 2026, in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Trump’s Elevation of Stephen Miller Proves His Promise to Work With Democrats Is a Farce

In the immediate aftermath of Tuesday’s sweeping midterm election losses, a chastened President Donald Trump struck an unusually conciliatory tone, signaling a willingness to work with Democrats. But the spirit of bipartisanship proved fleeting.

By forcing out Susie Wiles and elevating Stephen Miller to White House Chief of Staff, Trump has delivered a definitive, defiant message to the American electorate: the era of uncompromising grievance and division isn't over—it is being supercharged.

Keep ReadingShow less
economics graph on blackboard

economics graph on blackboard

Getty Images

What Post-1971 Supply-side Economics Has Done to Veterans

Post-1971 supply-side economics—often referred to as "trickle-down economics" or "Reaganomics” fundamentally transformed the relationship between the federal government and military veterans. The year 1971 marked the end of the Bretton Woods system, the closing of the gold window, and a pivot toward neoliberal economic frameworks that prioritized deregulation, sweeping tax cuts, and aggressive federal deficit reduction via domestic spending cuts.

For veterans, who had previously benefited from the expansive, New Deal-style social investments of the original G.I. Bill, this macroeconomic paradigm shift led to four distinct structural consequences:

Keep ReadingShow less
Bank sign
The bank of ornate classical columns and facade
Photo by Leo_Visions on Unsplash

A Bank Account Should Not Come with a Political Litmus Test

The ongoing appetite for "debanking"—pressuring financial institutions to cut off customers because of who they are, what they believe, or with whom they associate—should concern everyone. Why? Because in the end, anyone can become an easy target.

One pressure point has been protests against private banks whose customers are companies who build or operate immigration detention facilities under contracts with the Trump administration. The Boston area saw such protests earlier this year, and there have been others.

Keep ReadingShow less