Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Lyft to provide free and discounted rides to the polls, starting in Iowa

Lyft car
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Expecting you'll need a ride to your polling place this year? Calling a Lyft could be your best bet.

The ride-sharing company is offering free and discounted drives to polling stations across the country throughout the primary season and on Election Day nine months from now. The offer starts Monday in Iowa, when thousands of Democrats are required to venture out on a winter's night to participate in the first presidential caucuses.

The company is partnering with five national nonprofits to provide rides: the League of Women Voters, National Federation of the Blind, Student Veterans of America, National Urban League and Voto Latino Foundation. Those groups will distribute the discounted rides to people in their networks they identify as being most in need.


Lyft made a more modest contribution to boosting turnout during the 2018 midterm election.

The expectation is that younger voters, who are more familiar with the concept of hailing a taxi online, will make disproportionate use of the new offer.

In the 2016 presidential election, nearly 6 million voters younger than 29 were registered but did not cast ballots. A Tufts University study of the barriers young adults face in getting to the ballot box found that young people of color and without any college education were particularly likely to cite lack of access to transportation as the reason.

While Lyft did not say how much it will spend subsidizing civic engagement, more information about the new initiative is expected in the coming months. Expanding access to the polls is part of a larger LyftUp initiative that provides rides during natural disasters and to grocery stores and job interviews.


Read More

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less