Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Why ChatGPT’s ‘memory’ will be a health care gamechanger

Woman looking at her smartwatch while exercising

Generative AI will have a pround impact on U.S. medicine writes Pearl. For example, home wearable devices will be able update to patients about their health status and suggest medication adjustments or lifestyle changes.

Guido Mieth/Getty Images

Pearl is a clinical professor of plastic surgery at the Stanford University School of Medicine and is on the faculty of the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is a former CEO of The Permanente Medical Group.

OpenAI generated massive media interest with the announcement that its signature product, ChatGPT, is gaining memory. The new feature enables the generative artificial intelligence system to “carry what it learns between chats, allowing it to provide more relevant responses,” according to the company.

As Congress holds hearings and regulators rumble with apprehension, the media coverage so far has generally overlooked the biggest part of this announcement, which has direct ties to American health care:

The development of memory-powered AI is a pivotal step toward transforming U.S. medicine.


Although there are many technological and regulatory hurdles to clear — and fears around privacy and security to mitigate — this development has the potential to make health care more personalized, patient-centric and affordable. These improvements — alongside the potential pitfalls of AI-empowered health care — are the subject of my upcoming book, “ ChatGPT, MD: How AI-Empowered Patients & Doctors Can Take Back Control of American Medicine.”

Here are three ways generative AI’s improved memory will transform patient care:

More accurate diagnoses

For over a decade, clinicians have wanted to precisely tailor care to each patient’s unique health profile, including their genetic makeup and personal health preferences. But too much has stood in the way.

One major challenge is the sheer volume of knowledge required to customize medical care. The human genome consists of approximately 3 billion base pairs of DNA, which if typed out as letters would fill about 200 New York City phone books. What’s more, medical knowledge doubles every 73 days, making it almost impossible for any human to keep up with all the innovative medical findings and updated guidelines for helping patients.

A third hurdle is technological. With the average patient consulting 19 different doctors throughout their lifetime, an individual’s electronic medical records are often dispersed across numerous medical offices and health systems. The lack of interoperability among EMR systems compounds this issue, preventing clinicians —and, by extension, generative AI — from accessing a patient’s complete medical history.

Currently, ChatGPT’s “ context window ” (how many words it can recall before losing its memory), falls well short of the nearly 17,000 words found in the average patient’s medical record.

However, generative AI systems are predicted to become 30 times more powerful within the next five years, dramatically expanding their data retention capabilities and enhancing their reliability. This, combined with OpenAI’s specialized plug-ins (known as GPTs), offers promising opportunities. Initially, generative AI might access a limited set of patient data through platforms like My Chart, which can be used on personal computers or smartphones. Eventually, however, generative AI will enable patients to consolidate their digital medical records from various health care providers.

This will create a comprehensive, personalized health record, serving as a reliable resource for both patients and their health care teams.

With this information stored in an AI’s memory, patients will be able to input their symptoms and receive specific diagnostic and treatment suggestions.

For people who are uncertain about the significance or urgency of new symptoms, the AI will provide reliable advice. And for patients with rare or complex conditions, it will offer invaluable second opinions. Advanced diagnostic ability, alongside comprehensive health care information, will be instrumental in reducing the 400,000 annual deaths attributed to misdiagnoses.

Fewer complications from chronic sisease

Chronic diseases like diabetes, hypertension, obesity and asthma affect six in 10 U.S. adults. Complications from these diseases account for 1.7 million deaths each year.

Unlike acute illnesses that appear suddenly and usually are resolved quickly, chronic conditions persist over time, impacting tens of millions of Americans every single day.

Doctors care for these conditions in an episodic fashion, which is far from optimal. Patients with chronic diseases typically see their physician every three to four months, providing doctors with only a snapshot of their health status. As a result, chronic diseases aren’t controlled as well as they should be, which leads to life-threatening, and preventable, complications.

At a national level, hypertension is adequately controlled just 60 percent of the time, and effective blood sugar management in type 2 diabetes is achieved less than half the time. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that proper disease prevention and management approaches would reduce the risk of kidney failure, heart attacks and strokes by 30 percent to 50 percent.

Applying these percentages to the U.S. death toll from chronic disease complications, these CDC estimates indicate that more than half a million lives could be saved annually.

Generative AI, once connected to home wearable devices, can update patients about their health status and suggest medication adjustments or lifestyle changes. It can also remind them about necessary screenings and even facilitate testing appointments and transportation, thereby improving disease management, reducing complications and maximizing health outcomes.

Safer hospitals

Generative AI with memory will radically improve inpatient care, as well. Once it’s integrated with bedside monitors and able to remember a patient’s clinical status over time, the AI system will be able to immediately alert professionals when a problem arises, so they can intervene.

Additionally, video monitoring systems powered by AI could oversee the delivery of medical care, pinpointing any departures from established best practices. This real-time oversight would provide immediate alerts to caregivers, preventing medication mishaps and reducing the risk of infection.

These two uses of AI technology would help reduce the staggering 250,000 deaths each year attributed to preventable medical errors.

While ChatGPT and similar technologies hold immense potential, today’s generative AI tools still require clinician supervision. But looking ahead, the exponential growth of generative AI’s capabilities (doubling every year) points to a transformative future for the practice of medicine.

Now is the time for both clinicians and patients to become comfortable using generative AI. And it is an opportunity for regulators and elected officials to advance, not stifle its potential. With memory and GPTs, the doctor’s AI toolkit is quickly filling up.


Read More

Meta Undermining Trust but Verify through Paid Links
Facebook launches voting resource tool
Facebook launches voting resource tool

Meta Undermining Trust but Verify through Paid Links

Facebook is testing limits on shared external links, which would become a paid feature through their Meta Verified program, which costs $14.99 per month.

This change solidifies that verification badges are now meaningless signifiers. Yet it wasn’t always so; the verified internet was built to support participation and trust. Beginning with Twitter’s verification program launched in 2009, a checkmark next to a username indicated that an account had been verified to represent a notable person or official account for a business. We could believe that an elected official or a brand name was who they said they were online. When Twitter Blue, and later X Premium, began to support paid blue checkmarks in November of 2022, the visual identification of verification became deceptive. Think Fake Eli Lilly accounts posting about free insulin and impersonation accounts for Elon Musk himself.

This week’s move by Meta echoes changes at Twitter/X, despite the significant evidence that it leaves information quality and user experience in a worse place than before. Despite what Facebook says, all this tells anyone is that you paid.

Keep ReadingShow less
artificial intelligence

Rather than blame AI for young Americans struggling to find work, we need to build: build new educational institutions, new retraining and upskilling programs, and, most importantly, new firms.

Surasak Suwanmake/Getty Images

Blame AI or Build With AI? Only One Approach Creates Jobs

We’re failing young Americans. Many of them are struggling to find work. Unemployment among 16- to 24-year-olds topped 10.5% in August. Even among those who do find a job, many of them are settling for lower-paying roles. More than 50% of college grads are underemployed. To make matters worse, the path forward to a more stable, lucrative career is seemingly up in the air. High school grads in their twenties find jobs at nearly the same rate as those with four-year degrees.

We have two options: blame or build. The first involves blaming AI, as if this new technology is entirely to blame for the current economic malaise facing Gen Z. This course of action involves slowing or even stopping AI adoption. For example, there’s so-called robot taxes. The thinking goes that by placing financial penalties on firms that lean into AI, there will be more roles left to Gen Z and workers in general. Then there’s the idea of banning or limiting the use of AI in hiring and firing decisions. Applicants who have struggled to find work suggest that increased use of AI may be partially at fault. Others have called for providing workers with a greater say in whether and to what extent their firm uses AI. This may help firms find ways to integrate AI in a way that augments workers rather than replace them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Parv Mehta Is Leading the Fight Against AI Misinformation

A visual representation of deep fake and disinformation concepts, featuring various related keywords in green on a dark background, symbolizing the spread of false information and the impact of artificial intelligence.

Getty Images

Parv Mehta Is Leading the Fight Against AI Misinformation

At a moment when the country is grappling with the civic consequences of rapidly advancing technology, Parv Mehta stands out as one of the most forward‑thinking young leaders of his generation. Recognized as one of the 500 Gen Zers named to the 2025 Carnegie Young Leaders for Civic Preparedness cohort, Mehta represents the kind of grounded, community‑rooted innovator the program was designed to elevate.

A high school student from Washington state, Parv has emerged as a leading youth voice on the dangers of artificial intelligence and deepfakes. He recognized early that his generation would inherit a world where misinformation spreads faster than truth—and where young people are often the most vulnerable targets. Motivated by years of computer science classes and a growing awareness of AI’s risks, he launched a project to educate students across Washington about deepfake technology, media literacy, and digital safety.

Keep ReadingShow less
child holding smartphone

As Australia bans social media for kids under 16, U.S. parents face a harder truth: online safety isn’t an individual choice; it’s a collective responsibility.

Getty Images/Keiko Iwabuchi

Parents Must Quit Infighting to Keep Kids Safe Online

Last week, Australia’s social media ban for children under age 16 officially took effect. It remains to be seen how this law will shape families' behavior; however, it’s at least a stand against the tech takeover of childhood. Here in the U.S., however, we're in a different boat — a consensus on what's best for kids feels much harder to come by among both lawmakers and parents.

In order to make true progress on this issue, we must resist the fallacy of parental individualism – that what you choose for your own child is up to you alone. That it’s a personal, or family, decision to allow smartphones, or certain apps, or social media. But it’s not a personal decision. The choice you make for your family and your kids affects them and their friends, their friends' siblings, their classmates, and so on. If there is no general consensus around parenting decisions when it comes to tech, all kids are affected.

Keep ReadingShow less