Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Why we should bring our politics to the table

Millennial Action Project President & CEO Layla Zaidane

The Future Summit helps politicians set aside political affiliation while pioneering legislative solutions, writes Zaidane.

Courtesy Millennial Action Project
Zaidane is the president and CEO of Millennial Action Project.

We've heard the saying, "You can't have your cake and eat it, too."

We've been asked — for the sake of preventing conflict — to "not talk politics" in certain settings.

But what if bringing your politics to the table made the conversation productive? What if, in fact, you could have your cake and eat it, too? At the annual Future Summit, young lawmakers are not asked to drop the letter behind their name; instead, they are asked to leverage their legislative experience in order to co-create innovative policy solutions.

Yes, at Future Summit, you can have your politics and eat it, too.

The Millennial Action Project is a national, nonpartisan organization dedicated to ushering in more collaborative governance at the state and federal level. We believe in empowering our young leaders with the tools and relationships they need to better serve their constituencies, regardless of who they voted for. One of those tools is the annual Future Summit.

Millennial policymakers attend Future Summit because it provides them a unique space and opportunity to speak candidly about their legislative experience, take winning off the table, and find common ground with those across the aisle. One legislator shared with me how, telling me: "The event offered solutions-focused discussions and strategies to build a path out of this period of partisan division." This is exactly why we find our work vital. Legislators covered the future of work, energy and environment, criminal justice, democracy reform, term limits, legislative session lengths, and more.

I won't pretend this work is easy. That's precisely why it energizes me that legislators who might have begun Future Summit thinking they couldn't find common ground did just that. They embodied our ethos: Listen first, say "we", build trust, empower others, break barriers and find ways to innovate freely.

While this work isn't done overnight, we are planting the seeds to reimagine our democracy. Future Summit enables young lawmakers to make progress toward a new approach to politics that our country greatly needs: post-partisanship. By moving beyond conventional party divides — by refusing to settle for middle-of-the-road solutions that satisfy no party — we create a third, more enterprising option: new, innovative policy solutions. These solutions may not neatly fit anywhere on the two-dimensional spectrum. That's the point. Instead, they exist in a new dimension that can only be achieved only through collaboration, and most of all empathy for differing perspectives.

One legislator shared how she makes a point of connecting with someone seemingly "as far opposite" of her on the political spectrum each legislative session, and coauthors a bill where they can find common ground. This is innovation: setting aside political affiliation for pioneering solutions and finding strength in difference.

I greatly appreciated the opportunity to exchange ideas with fellow legislators from across the country at the 2021 Future Summit, and was particularly impressed with the commitment to bipartisanship exhibited throughout the conference. Several sessions sparked new ideas for me, and I was inspired to grow my presence on social channels during the media lunchtime session. — Democratic state Rep. Aaron Ling Johanson of Hawaii

Future Summit has gone on to birth State Future Caucuses, most recently in Connecticut and Oklahoma, with the help of MAP. In 2018, Utah state Sen. Daniel Thatcher gained momentum at Future Summit to catalyze the implementation of what we now know as the national suicide prevention hotline, 9-8-8. From his efforts cross-pollinating at the state level, this legislation was introduced in Congress as HR 4194, and was signed into law by President Donald Trump on Oct. 19, 2020.

This event encapsulates every aspect of MAP's work; it represents more than old school bipartisanship, it's a laboratory curating a new political culture rooted in collaboration. The work done here is just the beginning of real millennial-driven policy change. It lays the groundwork for productive politics and a more representative and inclusive form of governance.

We must stretch the spirit of Future Summit far beyond the two-day event. Legislators can do this by co-creating legislation with colleagues across the aisle. Americans can do this by sharing positive bridge-building stories that often don't make the national headlines.

Future Summit proves that our generation can change the political culture and restore public trust in democracy.


Read More

Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico

Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico speaks at an American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations rally at The Texas Gulf Coast Labor Federation on October 21, 2026 in Houston, Texas. As a former union member, Talarico spoke of the fight between billionaires and workers.

(Photo by Danielle Villasana/Getty Images)

Are Independent Voters About to Flip Texas?

Texas is in the middle of one of its most contentious and heated elections in modern history. The question that lingers in the national press is, will the state flip to Democrats in the major statewide contests for US Senate and governor?

But the voters who will decide this question aren’t Republicans. They aren’t Democrats. As previously predicted on IVN, it will most likely be independent voters—if they turn out.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman sitting and typing on laptop on her lap.

AI chatbots are always guessing, even when they sound sure. Experts and Claude itself explain the AI trust gap, bias and why to check sources.

Oscar Wong/Getty Images

AI’s Information Crisis: Why Trust Is Harder to Sustain Than Ever

In all the debates about human and machine intelligence, one thing has become clear: We humans love to talk about AI. We’ve speculated whether AI will create or eliminate jobs, revolutionize or destroy science, comfort or torment us, entertain us brilliantly or rot our brains, or some combination of all these things. But amid the noise, we may have paid too little attention to a subtler impact: how AI is disrupting our relationship to information and making it harder to know what to believe.

The problem isn’t just deepfakes, the malicious manipulation of images, video, and audio. Even benign, well-intentioned AI applications can be profoundly misleading. The nature of the large language models that power chatbots means that they are always guessing, however confident they seem. How can we use AI to produce reliable information that improves public discourse rather than distorting it?

Keep ReadingShow less
Digital illustration of robot's hand holding and supporting man who is working on his desk using computer, represent themes of artificial intelligence (AI), the future of work, and the intersection of humanity and technology.

Universal basic income would cost trillions. Wage insurance, a bigger child tax credit, and a tax break for work could help workers left behind by AI at a fraction of the price.

Andriy Onufriyenko / Getty Images

AI’s Costs: The Human Element & the Response

The age of AI will be a revolutionary age. In medicine, engineering, and more, there is the possibility of great benefit to humanity. Consider some Wall Street Journal headlines: “The Quest to Use AI to Help Find New Drugs,” and “Fusion Startup Gets an AI Boost.” Already, AI is a substantial portion of GDP growth.

Yet a rising tide will not lift the boats with holes in their hulls, as Jack Kemp once said. Artificial intelligence is challenging our leaders to think about those possibly left behind. Within the AI community itself, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei expresses concern that we could see 5-10% GDP growth with 10% unemployment.

Keep ReadingShow less
Social Security card, treasury check and $100 bills

A Social Security inspector general found $1 billion in improper SSI payments tied to earnings alerts left unresolved for two years. Here’s what went wrong.

JJ Gouin/Getty Images

$1 Billion, 733 Days: Inside Social Security’s Improper-Payment Backlog

Social Security's inspector general opened its books this week and found a number that should stop any controller cold: roughly $1 billion in improper Supplemental Security Income payments, made to 333,800 recipients, sitting on top of a backlog the agency has known about for years. The cause was not a hacker, not a sophisticated fraud ring, and not a policy loophole. It was an earnings alert nobody closed out.

Here is how the mechanism actually works, and why it matters more than the headline figure. When a recipient's reported earnings change, the Social Security Administration's system generates an alert flagging that the payment amount may need adjustment. An employee is supposed to resolve that alert, verify the wage documentation, and correct the payment before the gap compounds. The inspector general's office pulled a sample of 100 such cases. Only 20 had been resolved. Sixty-three had gone untouched entirely, left pending for an average of 733 days, just over two years. Seventeen more were marked "cleared" without the wage documentation ever being fully verified, meaning the case was closed on paper while the underlying question remained open.

Keep ReadingShow less