Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Why we should bring our politics to the table

Millennial Action Project President & CEO Layla Zaidane

The Future Summit helps politicians set aside political affiliation while pioneering legislative solutions, writes Zaidane.

Courtesy Millennial Action Project
Zaidane is the president and CEO of Millennial Action Project.

We've heard the saying, "You can't have your cake and eat it, too."

We've been asked — for the sake of preventing conflict — to "not talk politics" in certain settings.

But what if bringing your politics to the table made the conversation productive? What if, in fact, you could have your cake and eat it, too? At the annual Future Summit, young lawmakers are not asked to drop the letter behind their name; instead, they are asked to leverage their legislative experience in order to co-create innovative policy solutions.

Yes, at Future Summit, you can have your politics and eat it, too.

The Millennial Action Project is a national, nonpartisan organization dedicated to ushering in more collaborative governance at the state and federal level. We believe in empowering our young leaders with the tools and relationships they need to better serve their constituencies, regardless of who they voted for. One of those tools is the annual Future Summit.

Millennial policymakers attend Future Summit because it provides them a unique space and opportunity to speak candidly about their legislative experience, take winning off the table, and find common ground with those across the aisle. One legislator shared with me how, telling me: "The event offered solutions-focused discussions and strategies to build a path out of this period of partisan division." This is exactly why we find our work vital. Legislators covered the future of work, energy and environment, criminal justice, democracy reform, term limits, legislative session lengths, and more.

I won't pretend this work is easy. That's precisely why it energizes me that legislators who might have begun Future Summit thinking they couldn't find common ground did just that. They embodied our ethos: Listen first, say "we", build trust, empower others, break barriers and find ways to innovate freely.

While this work isn't done overnight, we are planting the seeds to reimagine our democracy. Future Summit enables young lawmakers to make progress toward a new approach to politics that our country greatly needs: post-partisanship. By moving beyond conventional party divides — by refusing to settle for middle-of-the-road solutions that satisfy no party — we create a third, more enterprising option: new, innovative policy solutions. These solutions may not neatly fit anywhere on the two-dimensional spectrum. That's the point. Instead, they exist in a new dimension that can only be achieved only through collaboration, and most of all empathy for differing perspectives.

One legislator shared how she makes a point of connecting with someone seemingly "as far opposite" of her on the political spectrum each legislative session, and coauthors a bill where they can find common ground. This is innovation: setting aside political affiliation for pioneering solutions and finding strength in difference.

I greatly appreciated the opportunity to exchange ideas with fellow legislators from across the country at the 2021 Future Summit, and was particularly impressed with the commitment to bipartisanship exhibited throughout the conference. Several sessions sparked new ideas for me, and I was inspired to grow my presence on social channels during the media lunchtime session. — Democratic state Rep. Aaron Ling Johanson of Hawaii

Future Summit has gone on to birth State Future Caucuses, most recently in Connecticut and Oklahoma, with the help of MAP. In 2018, Utah state Sen. Daniel Thatcher gained momentum at Future Summit to catalyze the implementation of what we now know as the national suicide prevention hotline, 9-8-8. From his efforts cross-pollinating at the state level, this legislation was introduced in Congress as HR 4194, and was signed into law by President Donald Trump on Oct. 19, 2020.

This event encapsulates every aspect of MAP's work; it represents more than old school bipartisanship, it's a laboratory curating a new political culture rooted in collaboration. The work done here is just the beginning of real millennial-driven policy change. It lays the groundwork for productive politics and a more representative and inclusive form of governance.

We must stretch the spirit of Future Summit far beyond the two-day event. Legislators can do this by co-creating legislation with colleagues across the aisle. Americans can do this by sharing positive bridge-building stories that often don't make the national headlines.

Future Summit proves that our generation can change the political culture and restore public trust in democracy.


Read More

Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses

This week, I joined a coalition of journalists in Washington, D.C., to speak directly with lawmakers about a crisis unfolding in plain sight: the rapid disappearance of local, community‑rooted journalism. The advocacy day, organized by the Hispanic Technology & Telecommunications Partnership (HTTP), brought together reporters and media leaders who understand that the future of local news is inseparable from the future of American democracy.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You

The brutality of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the related cohort of federal officers in Minneapolis spurred more than 30,000 stalwart Minnesotans to step forward in January and be trained as monitors. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s demands to Minnesota’s Governor demonstrate that the ICE surge is linked to elections, and other ICE-related threats, including Steve Bannon calling for ICE agents deployment to polling stations, make clear that elections should be on the monitoring agenda in Minnesota and across the nation.

A recent exhortation by the New York Times Editorial Board underscores the need for citizen action to defend elections and outlines some steps. Additional avenues are also available. My three decades of experience with international and citizen election observation in numerous countries demonstrates that monitoring safeguards trustworthy elections and promotes public confidence in them - both of which are needed here and now in the US.

Keep ReadingShow less