Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories
Made with Flourish

Paging Mitch McConnell: Majority of Americans want more election security

Made with Flourish
Made with Flourish

Who's concerned about election security? The majority of Americans.

According to a new poll by the Brookings Institution, a majority of Americans support both additional funding and more technical assistance to help states protect against interference in the 2020 presidential election.

Perhaps the survey results and growing pressure from his own party will move Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to stop blocking legislation that would bolster election security.

The Brookings Institution poll of 2,000 adults conducted in early August found that 58 percent supported additional funding for election security and 60 percent endorsed more technical assistance to help states upgrade their election infrastructure to combat interference.


Only 19 percent opposed more funding and 23 percent opposed more assistance. About a quarter of those surveyed were "unsure" of either proposal, according to the survey.

Congress approved $380 million in election security grant funding to the states last year, but state officials have said the funds don't go far enough to protect all voting systems against cyberattacks.

The poll did find mixed results over concerns about foreign interference in elections and whether state officials were doing enough to protect the integrity of the ballot box.

Among those surveyed, 34 percent said foreign interference was "very much" a threat to American democracy versus 26 percent who said it was "not very much" of a threat.

On whether their state election officials were doing enough to safeguard voting machines, 32 percent said yes and 29 percent said no, with the majority (39 percent) saying they were unsure.

Nearly twice as many survey participants (29 percent) believed Democrats were doing more to fight foreign interference than Republicans (16 percent). The Democratic-led House of Representatives has passed election security legislation, and there are a number of bipartisan bills that have been introduced in the Senate. But McConnell has refused to allow a vote on any of them.

Over a quarter of those surveyed also said concerns about foreign interference will make them more likely to vote; only 3 percent said it will make them less likely.

Made with Flourish

Read More

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

The president is granting refugee status to white South Africans. Meanwhile, he is issuing travel bans, unsure about his duty to uphold due process, fighting birthright citizenship, and backing massive human rights breaches against people of color, including deporting citizens and people authorized to be here.

The administration’s escalating immigration enforcement—marked by “fast-track” deportations or disappearances without due process—signal a dangerous leveling-up of aggressive anti-immigration policies and authoritarian tactics. In the face of the immigration chaos that we are now in, we could—and should—turn our efforts toward making immigration policies less racist, more efficient, and more humane because America’s promise is built on freedom and democracy, not terror. As social scientists, we know that in America, thinking people can and should “just get documented” ignores the very real and large barriers embedded in our systems.

Keep ReadingShow less
Insider trading in Washington, DC

U.S. senators and representatives with access to non-public information are permitted to buy and sell individual stocks. It’s not just unethical; it sends the message that the game is rigged.

Getty Images, Greggory DiSalvo

Insider Trading: If CEOs Can’t Do It, Why Can Congress?

Ivan Boesky. Martha Stewart. Jeffrey Skilling.

Each became infamous for using privileged, non-public information to profit unfairly from the stock market. They were prosecuted. They served time. Because insider trading is a crime that threatens public trust and distorts free markets.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

A pump jack seen in a southeast New Mexico oilfield.

Getty Images, Daniel A. Leifheit

Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

Getting federal approval for permits to build bridges, wind farms, highways and other major infrastructure projects has long been a complicated and time-consuming process. Despite growing calls from both parties for Congress and federal agencies to reform that process, there had been few significant revisions – until now.

In one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court has changed a big part of the game.

Keep ReadingShow less