Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Momentum for nonpartisan civic education

Momentum for nonpartisan civic education

Louise Dubè is the executive director of iCivics. Civic Learning Week is cosponsored by the Farvue Foundation, iCivics, Microsoft, the National Archives, the National Archives Foundation, the National Council for the Social Studies, and the SN Charitable Foundation.

Headlines and conversations all around us tell us just how rare agreement on any topic is. Yet despite our myriad divisions, Americans from across the political spectrum agree on the i mportance of civic education, that we need more of it, and that it should be better funded.


What’s more, Americans agree that fundamental civic knowledge should be a centerpiece of that education. And we agree that civic skills are crucial. Time and again, parents indicate the desire for their kids to gain concrete skills that will help them be successful in life and work—a high-quality civic education does just that. Parents and educators, alike, want the very best civic education for our kids.

Civic education is a lifelong endeavor. As school districts across the country are looking for innovative ways to teach civics in a way that meets the needs of today’s student population, philanthropies and Fortune 500 corporations are looking to up their investments in civics and community engagement. Leaders from every sector are looking at how to engage in civic learning to sustain a healthy democracy, and new research is supporting the field.

This is the momentum that is fueling more than 100 organizations to come together March 6–10 to take part in the first-ever national Civic Learning Week. Additionally, 20 states have officially endorsed this week that provides an opportunity to celebrate the important role civic education plays in sustaining and strengthening our constitutional democracy.

The week will be marked by a half-day opening forum on March 7 at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., and scores of in-person and online events across the country throughout the week. At the events, attendees will learn about new research in civic education, engage with thought leaders about innovations in the field, and have the opportunity to connect around a shared commitment to civic education.

This agreement and shared commitment does not mean civic education will look the same from state to state, or school district to school district—nor should it.

Difference is a feature of democracy—not a bug. But differences in viewpoints cannot undermine our commitment to prepare our citizenry to be informed and engaged members of our self-governing society. To solve our common problems we need more, not less, engagement across differences. Despite the partisan nature of our political system, the teaching of civics and our commitment to civic education must remain entirely nonpartisan.

The kinds of strides we’ve seen over the past years in our shared commitment to civic education have been possible because individuals, organizations, and policymakers have set aside individual and organizational interests to work together even when they disagreed:

●In the year-end omnibus bill, Congress made a significant down payment by increasing the federal allocation for civic education from $7.5 million to $24 million.

●In the last biennium, 16 states adopted 17 policies aligned with the CivXNow Coalition’s State Policy Menu. And the 2023 spring legislative session shows promise with more than 50 bills to advance civic education filed so far in 21 states.

●The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and the U.S. Department of Education funded—initially under the Trump administration and continued under the Biden administration—the landmark Educating for American Democracy initiative that provides an inquiry-based framework for excellence in civics and U.S. history for all learners.

These are advances we celebrate. They represent down payments toward an increasingly healthy democracy. Join us in-person or online for Civic Learning Week—and let’s demonstrate that we stand united behind civic education.


Read More

An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs at a rally, one reads, "Trump is not above the law."

Protesters gather at a Nobody Is Above the Law rally protesting President Trump's interference in the Mueller investigation on November 08, 2018 in Washington, DC.

Larry French/Getty Images

The Double Standard Presidency: When We Watch Leaders Act Above the Law

Americans are told that no one is above the law. Yet every day, they watch a president behave in ways that would get any ordinary citizen fired, disciplined, confronted, or held accountable — and they watch some Americans excuse it. What makes this moment even more striking is that critics across the political spectrum, including conservatives, now warn that the presidency is operating on a dangerous double standard. This is not a partisan concern. It is a constitutional one. And it is tearing at the fabric of our democracy.

For generations, the Constitution has provided guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, oversight mechanisms, and limits on executive authority — designed to prevent any leader from functioning above the law. The framers feared concentrated power more than anything else. They believed that the presidency must be constrained not only by written law but by norms of restraint, dignity, and respect for institutions. Those norms held for centuries because presidents understood that the office was larger than any individual, and Congress understood that oversight was not optional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Latino immigrants and U.S.-born Latinos differ sharply in how much their identity shapes their daily lives, according to recent findings from the Pew Research Center’s 2025 National Survey of Latinos. The survey shows that Latino immigrants are far more likely than U.S.-born Latinos to say their identity is central to who they are, and that it influences their experiences in the United States. Pew researchers Gabriel Piña, Mark Hugo Lopez, Sahana Mukherjee, Dalia Fahmy, and Alexandra Cahn report that the divide reflects differences in cultural connection, lived experience, and generational distance from immigrant roots.

Pew’s analysis finds that Latino immigrants are significantly more likely to say their origins are central to their identity, while U.S.-born Latinos — especially those in the third generation or higher — are less likely to feel that connection. The report notes that “U.S. Hispanics are divided on whether their identity helps or hurts them in America,” with some respondents describing their Latino identity as a source of pride and connection, and others saying it is tied to discrimination or barriers.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Clerk Matthew Sandbar, 34, demonstrates part of the ballot-sorting process to members of the media attending a walkthrough of the Philadelphia Ballot Processing Center used to process the ballots of the 2022 US midterm elections, in Philadelphia on October 27, 2022.

Photo by Ryan Collerd / AFP via Getty Images

A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Tallying the results of Washington, DC’s first ranked-choice election in June took about 10 days—longer than many voters are used to. In an age when artificial intelligence can generate an answer in seconds, waiting days for election results can feel old-fashioned, inefficient, even suspicious. And it is about to matter far more widely. This November, 17 states, cities, and counties will use ranked-choice voting, including Maine and Alaska statewide, in races that could help decide control of Congress. More voters than ever will watch results take days to resolve, and more will be asked to trust a count they cannot see.

But that slowness may be one of its most democratic features.

Keep ReadingShow less