Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Nebraska the first red state sending mail-in-vote applications to everyone

Nebraska flag
Oleksii Liskonih/Getty Images

Applications for a mail-in ballot will be sent to all 1.2 million registered voters in Nebraska.

It's the ninth state to make such a move in an effort to promote remote voting because of the coronavirus pandemic. But it's by far the most Republican state to do so, notable given President Trump's persistent and false claims that widespread voting by mail guarantees widespread fraud.


"For voters who have concerns about voting at the polls in November, an early ballot request for a mail-in ballot is a good option," GOP Secretary of State Bob Evnen said in announcing the mailing Wednesday.

Nebraskans will have until 11 days before the election to send back the request form, but the Postal Service says completed ballots should be in the mail a week earlier to be confident of arriving in time to be counted. Voters can also drop off envelopes at polling places or cast ballots in person Nov. 3.

The state also sent mail ballot applications to voters for the May primary and nearly 384,000 voted that way — a record 78 percent of all votes cast.

Republican nominees generally capture about three-fifths of the statewide vote, as Trump did four years ago. But Nebraska is one of just two states (along with Maine) that award an electoral vote to the winner of each congressional district, and polling suggests the district seat centered on Omaha is up for grabs — in part because the House race itself is a tossup.

The other states sending vote-by-mail applications statewide are battlegrounds Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa — and reliably blue Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland and New Mexico.

California, Nevada, New Jersey, Vermont, Washington, D.C. and virtually every county in Montana have gone a step further and decided to mail every voter an absentee ballot — joining five states that planned to do so before Covid-19: Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Utah and Washington.

Read More

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

The president is granting refugee status to white South Africans. Meanwhile, he is issuing travel bans, unsure about his duty to uphold due process, fighting birthright citizenship, and backing massive human rights breaches against people of color, including deporting citizens and people authorized to be here.

The administration’s escalating immigration enforcement—marked by “fast-track” deportations or disappearances without due process—signal a dangerous leveling-up of aggressive anti-immigration policies and authoritarian tactics. In the face of the immigration chaos that we are now in, we could—and should—turn our efforts toward making immigration policies less racist, more efficient, and more humane because America’s promise is built on freedom and democracy, not terror. As social scientists, we know that in America, thinking people can and should “just get documented” ignores the very real and large barriers embedded in our systems.

Keep ReadingShow less
Insider trading in Washington, DC

U.S. senators and representatives with access to non-public information are permitted to buy and sell individual stocks. It’s not just unethical; it sends the message that the game is rigged.

Getty Images, Greggory DiSalvo

Insider Trading: If CEOs Can’t Do It, Why Can Congress?

Ivan Boesky. Martha Stewart. Jeffrey Skilling.

Each became infamous for using privileged, non-public information to profit unfairly from the stock market. They were prosecuted. They served time. Because insider trading is a crime that threatens public trust and distorts free markets.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

A pump jack seen in a southeast New Mexico oilfield.

Getty Images, Daniel A. Leifheit

Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

Getting federal approval for permits to build bridges, wind farms, highways and other major infrastructure projects has long been a complicated and time-consuming process. Despite growing calls from both parties for Congress and federal agencies to reform that process, there had been few significant revisions – until now.

In one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court has changed a big part of the game.

Keep ReadingShow less