Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

What if there's a primary Tuesday but nobody's worried? Ask Nebraska.

Don Bacon

Rep. Don Bacon of Omaha could face a rematch against progressive activist Kara Eastman, who is vying for the Democratic nomination.

Bill Clark/Getty Images

Nebraskans are heading to the polls Tuesday, as previously scheduled, for the first statewide primary in five weeks in which anyone may vote in person. This is news because the election has generated almost no news.

Already liberal vote-by-mail rules and the absence of hot contests, plus consistency and collaboration from the officials in charge, mean essentially no one is predicting anything close to another Wisconsin — where polling places were required to be opened wide and on time, despite the coronavirus pandemic.


The most tangible difference this time is that the Republicans in charge of elections in Nebraska, Gov. Pete Ricketts and Secretary of State Robert Evnen, decided back in March to break with past practice and send absentee ballot request forms to all 1.2 million registered voters — and urge people to fill out their applications. (Wisconsin's divided government could not agree on taking this initial step, and a subsequent blizzard of legal and political fighting kept voters confused until primary eve.)

As a result, the number of ballots cast by mail in the Nebraska primary has already surpassed total turnout in the last two primaries. The number of returned ballots exceeded 332,000 by the end of last week — 3 percent more than all the votes cast in 2016, when both presidential nominations were on the ballot, and 23 percent more than two years ago, when both parties were picking fresh candidates for governor.

The volume of absentee ballots — five times the number of mailed-in forms four years ago — suggests a relatively small share of the total vote will be cast Tuesday, when many but not all polling places will be open. Nebraska is among just five states that never imposed a statewide stay-at-home order.

Instead, since nearly half a million people completed applications to vote absentee, the state may see a surge of people using the drop boxes available until polls close at 8 p.m.

Evnen anticipates as few as 25,000 people will vote in person. Those who do are asked to arrive wearing a mask — or else accept one from a supply available at each polling station. They will receive their own pens for marking their ballots. Those waiting to vote will have to stand the customary six feet apart, and the waits may be longer than expected because poll workers will disinfect the polling booths after each use.

The idea here, of course, is to minimize the risks of Covid-19 infection. At least 67 Wisconsinites have tested positive after voting in person or working at the polls April 7, although it's not clear how many were infected while exercising their civic duties or through a different means, the state Department of Health Services says.

With Joe Biden having wrapped up the Democratic presidential nomination and GOP Sen. Ben Sasse facing only token opposition for re-election, the most important race in the state is for the Omaha congressional seat. Progressive activist Kara Eastman is favored over two primary competitors for the Democratic nomination, which would put her in a rematch against GOP Rep. Don Bacon. Nominees for half the seats in the Legislature, various municipal offices and some seats on state regulatory boards are also on the ballot.

Read More

U.S. President Barack Obama speaking on the phone in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Barack Obama talks President Barack Obama talks with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a phone call from the Oval Office on November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, The White House

‘Obama, You're 15 Years Too Late!’

The mid-decade redistricting fight continues, while the word “hypocrisy” has become increasingly common in the media.

The origin of mid-decade redistricting dates back to the early history of the United States. However, its resurgence and legal acceptance primarily stem from the Texas redistricting effort in 2003, a controversial move by the Republican Party to redraw the state's congressional districts, and the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. This decision, which confirmed that mid-decade redistricting is not prohibited by federal law, was a significant turning point in the acceptance of this practice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of a person casting a ballot at a polling station during voting.

Gerrymandering silences communities and distorts elections. Proportional representation offers a proven path to fairer maps and real democracy.

Getty Images, bizoo_n

Gerrymandering Today, Gerrymandering Tomorrow, Gerrymandering Forever

In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace declared, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." (Watch the video of his speech.) As a politically aware high school senior, I was shocked by the venom and anger in his voice—the open, defiant embrace of systematic disenfranchisement, so different from the quieter racism I knew growing up outside Boston.

Today, watching politicians openly rig elections, I feel that same disbelief—especially seeing Republican leaders embrace that same systematic approach: gerrymandering now, gerrymandering tomorrow, gerrymandering forever.

Keep ReadingShow less
An oversized ballot box surrounded by people.

Young people worldwide form new parties to reshape politics—yet America’s two-party system blocks them.

Getty Images, J Studios

No Country for Young Politicians—and How To Fix That

In democracies around the world, young people have started new political parties whenever the establishment has sidelined their views or excluded them from policymaking. These parties have sometimes reinvigorated political competition, compelled established parties to take previously neglected issues seriously, or encouraged incumbent leaders to find better ways to include and reach out to young voters.

In Europe, a trio in their twenties started Volt in 2017 as a pan-European response to Brexit, and the party has managed to win seats in the European Parliament and in some national legislatures. In Germany, young people concerned about climate change created Klimaliste, a party committed to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as per the Paris Agreement. Although the party hasn’t won seats at the federal level, they have managed to win some municipal elections. In Chile, leaders of the 2011 student protests, who then won seats as independent candidates, created political parties like Revolución Democrática and Convergencia Social to institutionalize their movements. In 2022, one of these former student leaders, Gabriel Boric, became the president of Chile at 36 years old.

Keep ReadingShow less
How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

Demonstrators gather outside of The United States Supreme Court during an oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford to call for an end to partisan gerrymandering on October 3, 2017 in Washington, DC

Getty Images, Olivier Douliery

How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground. ~ Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Col. Edward Carrington, Paris, 27 May 1788

The Problem We Face

The U.S. House of Representatives was designed as the chamber of Congress most directly tethered to the people. Article I of the Constitution mandates that seats be apportioned among the states according to population and that members face election every two years—design features meant to keep representatives responsive to shifting public sentiment. Unlike the Senate, which prioritizes state sovereignty and representation, the House translates raw population counts into political voice: each House district is to contain roughly the same number of residents, ensuring that every citizen’s vote carries comparable weight. In principle, then, the House serves as the nation’s demographic mirror, channeling the diverse preferences of the electorate into lawmaking and acting as a safeguard against unresponsive or oligarchic governance.

Nationally, the mismatch between the overall popular vote and the partisan split in House seats is small, with less than a 1% tilt. But state-level results tell a different story. Take Connecticut: Democrats hold all five seats despite Republicans winning over 40% of the statewide vote. In Oklahoma, the inverse occurs—Republicans control every seat even though Democrats consistently earn around 40% of the vote.

Keep ReadingShow less