Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

What if there's a primary Tuesday but nobody's worried? Ask Nebraska.

Don Bacon

Rep. Don Bacon of Omaha could face a rematch against progressive activist Kara Eastman, who is vying for the Democratic nomination.

Bill Clark/Getty Images

Nebraskans are heading to the polls Tuesday, as previously scheduled, for the first statewide primary in five weeks in which anyone may vote in person. This is news because the election has generated almost no news.

Already liberal vote-by-mail rules and the absence of hot contests, plus consistency and collaboration from the officials in charge, mean essentially no one is predicting anything close to another Wisconsin — where polling places were required to be opened wide and on time, despite the coronavirus pandemic.


The most tangible difference this time is that the Republicans in charge of elections in Nebraska, Gov. Pete Ricketts and Secretary of State Robert Evnen, decided back in March to break with past practice and send absentee ballot request forms to all 1.2 million registered voters — and urge people to fill out their applications. (Wisconsin's divided government could not agree on taking this initial step, and a subsequent blizzard of legal and political fighting kept voters confused until primary eve.)

As a result, the number of ballots cast by mail in the Nebraska primary has already surpassed total turnout in the last two primaries. The number of returned ballots exceeded 332,000 by the end of last week — 3 percent more than all the votes cast in 2016, when both presidential nominations were on the ballot, and 23 percent more than two years ago, when both parties were picking fresh candidates for governor.

The volume of absentee ballots — five times the number of mailed-in forms four years ago — suggests a relatively small share of the total vote will be cast Tuesday, when many but not all polling places will be open. Nebraska is among just five states that never imposed a statewide stay-at-home order.

Instead, since nearly half a million people completed applications to vote absentee, the state may see a surge of people using the drop boxes available until polls close at 8 p.m.

Evnen anticipates as few as 25,000 people will vote in person. Those who do are asked to arrive wearing a mask — or else accept one from a supply available at each polling station. They will receive their own pens for marking their ballots. Those waiting to vote will have to stand the customary six feet apart, and the waits may be longer than expected because poll workers will disinfect the polling booths after each use.

The idea here, of course, is to minimize the risks of Covid-19 infection. At least 67 Wisconsinites have tested positive after voting in person or working at the polls April 7, although it's not clear how many were infected while exercising their civic duties or through a different means, the state Department of Health Services says.

With Joe Biden having wrapped up the Democratic presidential nomination and GOP Sen. Ben Sasse facing only token opposition for re-election, the most important race in the state is for the Omaha congressional seat. Progressive activist Kara Eastman is favored over two primary competitors for the Democratic nomination, which would put her in a rematch against GOP Rep. Don Bacon. Nominees for half the seats in the Legislature, various municipal offices and some seats on state regulatory boards are also on the ballot.


Read More

People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less