The 11 states that would face federal oversight under a new Voting Rights Act
A growing chorus of congressional Democrats are saying that enacting a new Voting Rights Act is the best way for Congress to honor John Lewis, the civil rights icon and veteran Atlanta congressman who died last week.
The Republicans running the Senate have signaled no interest in debating the bill, designed to revive the racial discrimination protections enshrined in the original 1965 landmark law. The Democratic House passed the measure in December, with Lewis wielding the gavel during the vote.
Many of his colleagues now say the measure should be dubbed the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act. There's talk of pushing it through the House a second time this summer, perhaps with election assistance aid to the states tacked on.
The legislation is a response to the Supreme Court's 2013 decision invalidating a central provision of the law, which then required places with histories of discrimination to get Justice Department permission for any changes to election laws or processes. Nine states and parts of five others were subject to such "preclearance" at the time, but the court said the formula for deciding which jurisdictions made the list was unconstitutionally outdated.
Since that ruling, in Shelby County v. Holder, almost every one of those places has tightened voting rules.
Under the updated formula now stuck in Congress, the four most populous states would be subject to preclearance along with seven others, according to analysts at the Institute for Southern Studies, a progressive policy group:
- New York
- North Carolina
- South Carolina
- New York should pass its own Voting Rights Act - The Fulcrum ›
- How will Justice Barrett rule on voting rights? - The Fulcrum ›
- Calif. delivers mixed results for voting rights initiatives - The Fulcrum ›
- Will 2021 be defined by voting rights and electoral reform? - The Fulcrum ›
- Turning point for voting rights approaches - The Fulcrum ›