Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Why the massive success of 'Top Gun: Maverick' matters

Top Gun: Maverick
Skydance

Richard Davies is a podcast consultant, host and solutions journalist at daviescontent.com. He co-hosts the podcasts “How Do We Fix It?” and “Let’s Find Common Ground."

Even the makers of “Top Gun: Maverick” were surprised by its stunning ticket sales.

In a quarterly report to shareholders last week, Paramount Global said the blockbuster movie was responsible for a bump in corporate profits — bringing in more than $1.3 billion in global box office revenue. That’s more than “Titanic.” The second chapter of “Top Gun” is the studio’s biggest U.S. movie of all time.

Audiences young and old, urban and rural, liberal and conservative actually actually got up off their sofas and bought tickets to see a movie. Together.


Such a shared experience is a rare thing in our modern stay-at-home, remote working, siloed Covid world.

One reason for the success of “Top Gun”? We were treated to 2 hours and 11 minutes of feel-good fun with no strings attached. People like that. The absence of overt, cause-related commentary was noticeable after years of none-too-subtle social and political messaging, even in many action and superhero films.

As author and journalist Matt Taibbi wrote in his recent Substack column: “We’re nearly a decade into a crippling fun shortage. We have complexes about every holiday from Christmas to Thanksgiving to the Fourth of July.”

The exhausted majority of moviegoers can be excused for flocking to a traditional rock ’em, sock ’em roller coaster ride of a movie that celebrated teamwork by a group of skilled military men and women who believe in flag and country.

Sounds kind of corny corny, right? And yet the popularity of tried and true nostalgia is surprisingly widespread, even among Millennials and Generation Z audiences.

Music makers and radio programmers know this all too well. “Old songs now represent 70% of the U.S. music market,” wrote Ted Gioia in The Atlantic earlier this year. “The new-music market is actually shrinking. All the growth in the market is coming from old songs.”

Classic rock songs first recorded four or five decades ago continue to be a popular draw for many people who weren’t yet alive when the hits were first released.

“I firmly believe the rush to nostalgia accelerated during Covid,” says radio consultant Fred Jacobs. “People found their comfort in the familiar and the comfortable, whether it was watching ‘Raiders of the Lost Ark’ or listening to ‘Dark Side of the Moon.’”

No one could accuse “Top Gun: Maverick” of being art or especially innovative. Don’t expect any Oscar nods in 2023 for Tom Cruise or other members of the cast. But the film’s raging success may pack a powerful punch for Hollywood and the world beyond.

Common-ground, optimistic, traditional storytelling has an audience. Most of us, whatever our political beliefs, often prefer simple entertainment to preachy, and somewhat tortured, social commentary. And this has special resonance when we are frequently told that our nation is bitterly divided.

Humor and enjoyment may play a much bigger role in the social life of our nation than we may realize. And we need it now more than ever.

Part of the reason why America “won’ the Cold War in the 1980’ was that blue jeans, rock ’n’ roll, movies and TV were way cooler than the hammer and sickle, Soviet tanks, and Marxist dictatorship of the proletariat.

So thank you, Tom Cruise. You are helping to remind us again that popular culture can do what Congress, the Supreme Court and the mainstream media do not: Bring us together.

Read More

How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

Shoppers stand in line at a Nike outlet store on May 3, 2025 in San Diego, California.

Getty Images, Kevin Carter

How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

In the late 1980s, the Harvard Alcohol Project did just that. By embedding the term designated driver into prime-time television—from Cheers to L.A. Law—they didn’t just coin a phrase. They changed people’s behavior. The campaign was credited with helping reduce alcohol-related traffic fatalities by nearly 30% over the following decade. President George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, along with organizations like Mothers Against Drunk Driving, endorsed the movement, amplifying its reach.

They made sober driving socially admirable, not awkward. And they proved that when language meets culture, norms shift.

Keep ReadingShow less
La Ventanita: Uniting Conservative Mothers and Liberal Daughters

Steph Martinez and Rachel Ramirez with their mothers after their last performance

Photo Provided

La Ventanita: Uniting Conservative Mothers and Liberal Daughters

When Northwestern theater and creative writing junior Lux Vargas wrote and brought to life La Ventanita, she created a space of rest and home for those who live in the grief of not belonging anywhere, yet still yearn for a sense of belonging together. By closing night, Vargas had mothers and daughters, once splintered by politics, in each other's arms. In a small, sold-out theater in Evanston, the story on stage became a mirror: centering on mothers who fled the country and daughters who left again for college.

Performed four times on May 9 and 10, La Ventanita unfolds in a fictional cafecito window inspired by the walk-up restaurant counters found throughout Miami. “The ventanita breeds conversations and political exchange,” said Vargas.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Cruel Season at the Bus Stop

File: ICE agents making arrests

A Cruel Season at the Bus Stop

The poem you’re about to read is not a quiet reflection—it’s a flare shot into the night. It emerges from a moment when the boundaries between surveillance and censorship feel increasingly porous, and when the act of reading itself can be seen as resistance. The poet draws a chilling parallel between masked agents detaining immigrants and the quiet erasure of books from our schools and libraries. Both, he argues, are expressions of unchecked power—one overt, the other insidious.

This work invites us to confront the slippery slope where government overreach meets cultural suppression. It challenges us to ask: What happens when the stories we tell, the knowledge we share, and the communities we protect are deemed threats? And who gets to decide?

Keep ReadingShow less