Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Ranked-choice voting wins first Democracy Madness regional title

Democracy and basketball
danielfela/Getty Images

Ranked-choice voting kept its blow-out streak alive, besting calls for a new Voting Rights Act in the first Democracy Madness regional championship. RCV won by 29 points, making it the winner of the Voting bracket. It is the first of four democracy reform tactics that will compete in the Final Four in May.


RCV is an alternate voting method that allows voters to rank their preferred candidates and keeps whittling down the option through an instant runoff until one person has a majority of votes. It has been a darling of election reformers in recent years and rose to prominence following a 2016 referendum win in Maine, when voters approved RCV for all state and federal primary elections and general elections for Congress.

In 2018, voters overturned a legislative repeal and last year the Legislature extended the system to apply to the presidential election this fall and to the presidential primaries in four years.

Additionally, 18 cities have adopted RCV while others like New York City have passed legislation that will allow them to start using the alternate voting method in the future. In San Diego, the City Council is currently considering whether to add a ranked-choice voting measure to the November ballot — giving voters the opportunity to use RCV starting in 2022.

The alternative in this final was updating the Voting Rights Act, seen as essential to reversing the recent wave of laws that have suppressed the vote.

For five decades, places with histories of election discrimination had to get federal permission (called "preclearance") before changing any voting rules. That ended in 2013, when the Supreme Court struck down the formula deciding which states were covered. The Democratic House has passed a bill updating the formula but the GOP Senate has made clear it's not going anywhere.

RCV had to fend off the No. 3 seed, voting-at-home, in the regional semi-finals. Since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, expanding absentee balloting has become the dominant effort within the democracy reform movement. But ranked-choice voting won convincingly to advance to the finals.

The next region, focused on other structural changes to elections, kicks off Monday.

Read More

A person in a military uniform holding a gavel.

As the Trump administration redefines “Warrior Ethos,” U.S. military leaders face a crucial test: defend democracy or follow unlawful orders.

Getty Images, Liudmila Chernetska

Warrior Ethos or Rule of Law? The Military’s Defining Moment

Does Secretary Hegseth’s extraordinary summoning of hundreds of U.S. command generals and admirals to a Sept. 30 meeting and the repugnant reinstatement of Medals of Honor to 20 participants in the infamous 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre—in which 300 Lakota Sioux men, women, and children were killed—foreshadow the imposition of a twisted approach to U.S. “Warrior Ethos”? Should military leaders accept an ethos that ignores the rule of law?

Active duty and retired officers must trumpet a resounding: NO, that is not acceptable. And, we civilians must realize the stakes and join them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us
Provided

Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us

In the rush to “dismantle the administrative state,” some insist that freeing people from “burdensome bureaucracy” will unleash thriving. Will it? Let’s look together.

A century ago, bureaucracy was minimal. The 1920s followed a worldwide pandemic that killed an estimated 17.4–50 million people. While the virus spread, the Great War raged; we can still picture the dehumanizing use of mustard gas and trench warfare. When the war ended, the Roaring Twenties erupted as an antidote to grief. Despite Prohibition, life was a party—until the crash of 1929. The 1930s opened with a global depression, record joblessness, homelessness, and hunger. Despair spread faster than the pandemic had.

Keep ReadingShow less