Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Steward leadership

Steward leadership

Senator Margaret Chase Smith (R-ME) was among the first to criticize the tactics of Joseph McCarthy in her 1950 speech, "Declaration of Conscience".

Bettmann/Getty Images

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

So often we hear that Congress is broken and that reforms are needed to help overhaul the system so that Congress can address the serious problems facing our country. This is no doubt true and many organizations are working to fix this serious problem.


However, even if there is a massive overhaul in the rules of Congress and reforms related to how members of Congress are elected are enacted, Congress and our democracy will still not function effectively unless those who run for office represent a new type of elected leader based on servant leadership principles that are so sorely lacking today.

Fortunately, there is a growing realization that healthy self governance and the protection of our cherished democratic principles requires a new focus on leadership and many examples abound.

Retired General Wesley Clark leads one such effort through Renew America Together, an organization designed to promote and achieve greater common ground in America by reducing partisan division and gridlock. Their mission is to revitalize public and political discourse by teaching and promoting the leadership principles that put country before party.

Through the Civility Leadership Institute, participants work through an exciting curriculum, hear from dynamic nationally recognized speakers, and strengthen their relationships with each other all resulting in developing the skills needed for a renewal of our American democracy.

In General Clark’s recent CityBiz interview, he explains how communication training courses help regular citizens and future leaders understand that governance is about what brings us together and not what divides us.

Universities across the country are increasingly understanding they must serve an important role in advancing leadership principles. The Pennsylvania State University through the McCourtney Institute of Democracy offers a fellowship program where students are introduced to a different side of democracy—one that focuses not on campaigns and elections, but on bringing people together to work on common problems. Students learn about organizations doing this kind of work, and develop the skills necessary to facilitate conversations about community issues.

The classroom work is followed by an internship program at one of many cross-partisan democracy organizations across the country. This hands-on approach to democracy and leadership allows students to experience real life experiences at organizations that bring people together to solve common problems.

These are just two examples of many innovative new programs working to advance steward leadership in our nation; a leadership model that understands the critical importance of civil political discourse and critical thinking to a functioning democracy. Leadership that is direct and honest in public statements that puts ethical commitments above partisan and career objectives. Leadership that understands the importance of respect for all persons, including opponents, and a willingness to engage constructively with those across the aisle.

This idea of steward leadership in America is not new. While many argue the divide that separates us now is worse than ever, 70 years ago our nation was deeply divided during Senator Joe McCarthy's ruthless hearings to track down Americans who without proof were alleged Communists. We were a deeply divided country then as we are today and thus looking back can serve as a reminder of how remarkable leaders can make a difference.

As Senator Margaret Smith boarded the Senate subway to head to the chamber floor on June 1, 1950, another senator asked her why she looked so serious and asked her if she was going to give a speech. Her reply without hesitation was, "Yes, and you will not like it!" Surely it was the same feeling that Liz Cheney had 70 years later before her speech to Congress.

Smith, the first and only woman in the Senate in 1950, epitomized what servant leadership is as she put her political career at risk. Her words should be remembered today as we educate the next generation about what true leadership is:

"I speak as a Republican. I speak as a woman. I speak as a United States Senator. I speak as an American. Those of us who shout the loudest about Americanism in making character assassinations are all too frequently those who, by our own words and acts, ignore some of the basic principles of Americanism:

The right to criticize;

The right to hold unpopular beliefs;

The right to protest;

The right of independent thought.

Yet to displace it with a Republican regime embracing a philosophy that lacks political integrity or intellectual honesty would prove equally disastrous to this nation. The nation sorely needs a Republican victory. But I don't want to see the Republican Party ride to political victory on Fear, Ignorance, Bigotry, and Smear."

Today our country needs servant leaders more than ever.

Read More

Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
Millions Could Lose Housing Aid Under Trump Plan

Photo illustration by Alex Bandoni/ProPublica. Source images: Chicago History Museum and eobrazy

Getty Images

Millions Could Lose Housing Aid Under Trump Plan

Some 4 million people could lose federal housing assistance under new plans from the Trump administration, according to experts who reviewed drafts of two unpublished rules obtained by ProPublica. The rules would pave the way for a host of restrictions long sought by conservatives, including time limits on living in public housing, work requirements for many people receiving federal housing assistance and the stripping of aid from entire families if one member of the household is in the country illegally.

The first Trump administration tried and failed to implement similar policies, and renewed efforts have been in the works since early in the president’s second term. Now, the documents obtained by ProPublica lay out how the administration intends to overhaul major housing programs that serve some of the nation’s poorest residents, with sweeping reforms that experts and advocates warn will weaken the social safety net amid historically high rents, home prices and homelessness.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Ultimatums and the Erosion of Presidential Credibility

Donald Trump

YouTube

Trump’s Ultimatums and the Erosion of Presidential Credibility

On Friday, October 3rd, President Donald Trump issued a dramatic ultimatum on Truth Social, stating this is the “LAST CHANCE” for Hamas to accept a 20-point peace proposal backed by Israel and several Arab nations. The deadline, set for Sunday at 6:00 p.m. EDT, was framed as a final opportunity to avoid catastrophic consequences. Trump warned that if Hamas rejected the deal, “all HELL, like no one has ever seen before, will break out against Hamas,” and that its fighters would be “hunted down and killed.”

Ordinarily, when a president sets a deadline, the world takes him seriously. In history, Presidential deadlines signal resolve, seriousness, and the weight of executive authority. But with Trump, the pattern is different. His history of issuing ultimatums and then quietly backing off has dulled the edge of his threats and raised questions about their strategic value.

Keep ReadingShow less