Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump takes back openness to helping USPS as House steps in

Donald Trump, Fox and Friends, Postal Service,  mail voting

President Trump used a favorite venue Monday to sow fresh confusion about his vote-by-mail views.

Fox News

President Trump on Monday dismissed the Democratic congressional push to prop up the Postal Service as a "con game" and rebuffed the notion he is out to undermine the reliability of the mail ahead of an election counting on mail service as never before.

His comments sowed fresh confusion about whether he will agree to the cash infusion USPS says it needs to assure the timely delivery and return of tens of millions of ballot envelopes this fall. At the same time, he signaled support for cuts the post office has made this summer, which are prompting the House to return to Washington in a few days to pass legislation countermanding those moves.

"It's been run horribly. And we're going to make it good," Trump said on "Fox and Friends." "Now what am I supposed to do? Let it continue to run badly? So if you fix it, they say, 'Oh he's tampering with the election.' No, we're not tampering."


The president's latest comments underscore how there looks to be no easy or quick end to the fight over the Postal Service's capacity to fulfill its vital role in the democratic process this year. Democrats say Trump is out to sabotage the agency to sow doubt about the reliability of an election where he's now the underdog. The president insists he's out to prevent massive election cheating, which almost no one outside his orbit suspects.

Democrats have advocated giving $25 billion to USPS in the next legislative package to prop up the economy during the coronavirus pandemic, but before negotiations broke down last week they had tentatively agreed to $10 billion. (This is separate from the $3.5 billion the states requested to help them conduct a presidential election made much more complex by the pandemic.)

Trump himself on Saturday, and his chief of staff Mark Meadows on Sunday, expressed a willingness to provide additional funds to the USPS, maybe even in a bill separate from the stalled stimulus package. But the president on Monday dismissed those figures as politically motivated.

"This is a con game" by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Trump said, claiming without evidence that what they want is to pump federal money into only the blue states.

USPS sent letters at the end of July warning election officials in 40 states — including every potential presidential battleground — that their deadlines for requesting and returning absentee ballots were "incongruous" with the current state of mail service and that voters who act close to the cutoffs risk being disenfranchised. Six states and the District of Columbia received narrower warnings in part because their election procedures aren't finished, according to a comprehensive roster of the letters obtained by The Washington Post. Oregon, Nevada, New Mexico and Rhode Island did not get the warnings, apparently because the Postal Service doesn't feel stressed by their timetables.

Trump has been claiming for six months, without evidence, that remote voting routinely leads to massive fraud. He has sought to narrow that assertion in recent weeks, focusing his contempt on the small number of states — which have grown from five to 11 this year in response to the pandemic — that will proactively seek to deliver ballots to all the voters on their rolls this fall.

When Meadows was reminded on CNN yesterday that there's no evidence of widespread voter fraud in states that have relied on the mail for election in past years, his response was: "There's no evidence that there's not, either."

Meadows said the administration was willing to negotiate a USPS bailout separately in order to preserve the franchise for those who people who ask for and then receive an absentee ballot — including the president, who applied in Florida last week to vote for his own re-election that way, and millions of seniors, who not only have the highest turnout rates and tend to vote Republican but also are the group at the biggest risk for serious Covid-19 complications.

A potential bill to provide that money is not why Pelosi told House members on Sunday that they needed to return to the Capitol to vote on legislation, probably Saturday. Instead, the measure will order the Postal Service to return to the level of service it was maintaining at the start of the year.

House Democrats also demanded that the new postmaster general, major GOP donor and Trump friend Louis DeJoy, testify Auug. 24 at an emergency oversight hearing on mail delays.

In the name of stemming the longstanding flow of red ink at the post office, which has intensified during the pandemic, DeJoy had ordered cutbacks this summer including ending most overtime for postal workers, restrictions on delivery timetables and some shutdowns of mail-processing equipment. The removal of thousands of mailboxes was also underway, but over the weekend USPS announced a halt to that effort until after the election following complaints from customers and members of Congress.

"The postmaster general and top Postal Service leadership must answer to the Congress and the American people as to why they are pushing these dangerous new policies that threaten to silence the voices of millions, just months before the election," the Democrats said in announcing the new hearing date.

The hearing was moved up from the middle of September to the first day of the GOP convention. And a House vote this weekend will allow Democrats to highlight the issue right after the end of their nominating convention. But Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican, has sent senators home for a summer recess lasting until after Labor Day.

"What you are witnessing is a president of the United States who is doing everything he can to suppress the vote, make it harder for people to engage in mail-in balloting at a time when people will be putting their lives on the line by having to go out to a polling station and vote," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, the marquee speaker Monday night at a convention being held almost entirely virtually.

Sanders appeared on most of the Sunday TV news interview shows, while Meadows confined himself to CNN. "I'll give you that guarantee right now: The president of the United States is not going to interfere with anybody casting their vote in a legitimate way, whether it's the post office or anything else," he said.

The Postal Service is the country's most popular government agency, with 91 percent of Americans professing a favorable opinion in an April poll by the Pew Research Center.

Claim: Mail-in ballots can be sent to the wrong address. Fact check: False

"I Voted By Mail" cardSara Wilson, Medill School

Absentee voting refers to when a voter requests a ballot for an election and is then sent one in the mail. Vote-by-mail, which is what Sen. Tom Cotton is most likely referring to as "mass mail-in voting," is a system of sending every registered voter (an important distinction from "everyone") a ballot without a request. Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, Colorado, Hawaii, Utah, Washington and Oregon were already vote-by-mail states. But now California, Nevada and Vermont will also automatically send ballots to registered voters, while still having in-person options.

Vote-by-mail states send the ballot to the address on file in the voter registration database; the address was verified during the registration process. For example, in Colorado the ballot will be "sent to the mailing address you provided for your voter registration file." It's the voters' responsibility to update their address if they move.

These vote-by-mail states usually have the cleanest voter files because they interact with voters so regularly, according to Audrey Kline, the national policy director at the National Vote at Home Institute. Even if a ballot gets sent to the wrong address, it's most likely due to voter inaction rather than fraud.

"It's not like my ballot is going to end up in another city randomly," she wrote in an email. "Errors usually center around people not updating their voter registration before a ballot is mailed. So if you move and don't tell your clerk, you ballot could arrive at your old address. This in and of itself isn't usually a huge issue — they are non-forwardable and get sent back to the clerk." If someone does gets the wrong ballot mailed to them and then tries to impersonate that voter, that fraud is detectable by signature matching and other security policies.

"The fact is that mail ballot fraud on the scale that people are warning of is just not practical or economical," Kline said. "People say 'ripe for fraud' because nobody has figured out how to do it on a large scale, but they think it's still possible and are trying to keep the argument alive."


Read More

Protestors holding signs, including one that says "let the people vote."

Attendees hold signs advocating for voting rights and against the SAVE America Act at a rally to outside the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Heather Diehl

SAVE America Act Debate Begins; Mullin for DHS Hearing

Both chambers of Congress are in session this week and next. The House will probably function about like it has been - lots of votes (often by voice) on uncontroversial bills; many fewer votes on Republican priority bills. Lots of hearings this week and a few legislator updates.

Committee Meetings

Both chambers have a busy week with 64 total committee meetings scheduled.

Keep ReadingShow less
Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Crowd of people walking on a street.

Andy Andrews//Getty Images

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Biologist and author Paul Ehrlich, the most influential Chicken Little of the last century, died at the age of 93 this week. His 1968 book, “The Population Bomb,” launched decades of institutional panic in government, entertainment and journalism.

Ehrlich’s core neo-Malthusian argument was that overpopulation would exhaust the supply of food and natural resources, leading to a cascade of catastrophes around the world. “The Population Bomb” opens with a bold prediction, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A student in uniform walking through a campus.

A Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadet walks through campus November 7, 2003 in Princeton, New Jersey.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

Hegseth is Dumbing Down the Military (on Purpose)

One day before the United States began an ill-defined and illegal war of indefinite length with Iran, Pete Hegseth angrily attacked a different enemy: the Ivy League. The Secretary of War denounced Ivy League universities as "woke breeding grounds of toxic indoctrination” and then eliminated long-standing college fellowship programs with more than a dozen elite colleges, which had historically served as a pipeline for service members to the upper ranks of military leadership. Of the schools now on Hegseth’s "no-fly list," four sit in the top ten of the World’s Top Universities for 2026. So, why does the Secretary of War not want his armed forces to have the best education available? Because he wants a military without a brain.

For a guy obsessed with being the strongest and most lethal force in the world, cutting access to world-class schools is a bizarre gambit. It does reveal Hegseth doesn’t consider intelligence a factor–let alone an asset–in strength or lethality. That tracks. Hegseth alleges the Ivies infect officers with “globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks…” God forbid the tip of the sword of our foreign policy has knowledge of international cooperation and global interconnectedness. The Ivy League has its own issues, but the Pentagon’s claim that they "fail to deliver rigorous education grounded in realism” is almost laughable. I’m a veteran Lieutenant Commander with two Ivy League degrees, both paid for with military tuition assistance, and I promise: it was rigorous. Meanwhile, are Hegseth’s performative politics grounded in reality? Attacking Harvard on social media the eve of initiating a new war with a foreign adversary is disgraceful, and even delusional.

Keep ReadingShow less