Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump takes back openness to helping USPS as House steps in

Donald Trump, Fox and Friends, Postal Service,  mail voting

President Trump used a favorite venue Monday to sow fresh confusion about his vote-by-mail views.

Fox News

President Trump on Monday dismissed the Democratic congressional push to prop up the Postal Service as a "con game" and rebuffed the notion he is out to undermine the reliability of the mail ahead of an election counting on mail service as never before.

His comments sowed fresh confusion about whether he will agree to the cash infusion USPS says it needs to assure the timely delivery and return of tens of millions of ballot envelopes this fall. At the same time, he signaled support for cuts the post office has made this summer, which are prompting the House to return to Washington in a few days to pass legislation countermanding those moves.

"It's been run horribly. And we're going to make it good," Trump said on "Fox and Friends." "Now what am I supposed to do? Let it continue to run badly? So if you fix it, they say, 'Oh he's tampering with the election.' No, we're not tampering."


The president's latest comments underscore how there looks to be no easy or quick end to the fight over the Postal Service's capacity to fulfill its vital role in the democratic process this year. Democrats say Trump is out to sabotage the agency to sow doubt about the reliability of an election where he's now the underdog. The president insists he's out to prevent massive election cheating, which almost no one outside his orbit suspects.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Democrats have advocated giving $25 billion to USPS in the next legislative package to prop up the economy during the coronavirus pandemic, but before negotiations broke down last week they had tentatively agreed to $10 billion. (This is separate from the $3.5 billion the states requested to help them conduct a presidential election made much more complex by the pandemic.)

Trump himself on Saturday, and his chief of staff Mark Meadows on Sunday, expressed a willingness to provide additional funds to the USPS, maybe even in a bill separate from the stalled stimulus package. But the president on Monday dismissed those figures as politically motivated.

"This is a con game" by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Trump said, claiming without evidence that what they want is to pump federal money into only the blue states.

USPS sent letters at the end of July warning election officials in 40 states — including every potential presidential battleground — that their deadlines for requesting and returning absentee ballots were "incongruous" with the current state of mail service and that voters who act close to the cutoffs risk being disenfranchised. Six states and the District of Columbia received narrower warnings in part because their election procedures aren't finished, according to a comprehensive roster of the letters obtained by The Washington Post. Oregon, Nevada, New Mexico and Rhode Island did not get the warnings, apparently because the Postal Service doesn't feel stressed by their timetables.

Trump has been claiming for six months, without evidence, that remote voting routinely leads to massive fraud. He has sought to narrow that assertion in recent weeks, focusing his contempt on the small number of states — which have grown from five to 11 this year in response to the pandemic — that will proactively seek to deliver ballots to all the voters on their rolls this fall.

When Meadows was reminded on CNN yesterday that there's no evidence of widespread voter fraud in states that have relied on the mail for election in past years, his response was: "There's no evidence that there's not, either."

Meadows said the administration was willing to negotiate a USPS bailout separately in order to preserve the franchise for those who people who ask for and then receive an absentee ballot — including the president, who applied in Florida last week to vote for his own re-election that way, and millions of seniors, who not only have the highest turnout rates and tend to vote Republican but also are the group at the biggest risk for serious Covid-19 complications.

A potential bill to provide that money is not why Pelosi told House members on Sunday that they needed to return to the Capitol to vote on legislation, probably Saturday. Instead, the measure will order the Postal Service to return to the level of service it was maintaining at the start of the year.

House Democrats also demanded that the new postmaster general, major GOP donor and Trump friend Louis DeJoy, testify Auug. 24 at an emergency oversight hearing on mail delays.

In the name of stemming the longstanding flow of red ink at the post office, which has intensified during the pandemic, DeJoy had ordered cutbacks this summer including ending most overtime for postal workers, restrictions on delivery timetables and some shutdowns of mail-processing equipment. The removal of thousands of mailboxes was also underway, but over the weekend USPS announced a halt to that effort until after the election following complaints from customers and members of Congress.

"The postmaster general and top Postal Service leadership must answer to the Congress and the American people as to why they are pushing these dangerous new policies that threaten to silence the voices of millions, just months before the election," the Democrats said in announcing the new hearing date.

The hearing was moved up from the middle of September to the first day of the GOP convention. And a House vote this weekend will allow Democrats to highlight the issue right after the end of their nominating convention. But Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican, has sent senators home for a summer recess lasting until after Labor Day.

"What you are witnessing is a president of the United States who is doing everything he can to suppress the vote, make it harder for people to engage in mail-in balloting at a time when people will be putting their lives on the line by having to go out to a polling station and vote," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, the marquee speaker Monday night at a convention being held almost entirely virtually.

Sanders appeared on most of the Sunday TV news interview shows, while Meadows confined himself to CNN. "I'll give you that guarantee right now: The president of the United States is not going to interfere with anybody casting their vote in a legitimate way, whether it's the post office or anything else," he said.

The Postal Service is the country's most popular government agency, with 91 percent of Americans professing a favorable opinion in an April poll by the Pew Research Center.

Claim: Mail-in ballots can be sent to the wrong address. Fact check: False

Sara Wilson, Medill School

Absentee voting refers to when a voter requests a ballot for an election and is then sent one in the mail. Vote-by-mail, which is what Sen. Tom Cotton is most likely referring to as "mass mail-in voting," is a system of sending every registered voter (an important distinction from "everyone") a ballot without a request. Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, Colorado, Hawaii, Utah, Washington and Oregon were already vote-by-mail states. But now California, Nevada and Vermont will also automatically send ballots to registered voters, while still having in-person options.

Vote-by-mail states send the ballot to the address on file in the voter registration database; the address was verified during the registration process. For example, in Colorado the ballot will be "sent to the mailing address you provided for your voter registration file." It's the voters' responsibility to update their address if they move.

These vote-by-mail states usually have the cleanest voter files because they interact with voters so regularly, according to Audrey Kline, the national policy director at the National Vote at Home Institute. Even if a ballot gets sent to the wrong address, it's most likely due to voter inaction rather than fraud.

"It's not like my ballot is going to end up in another city randomly," she wrote in an email. "Errors usually center around people not updating their voter registration before a ballot is mailed. So if you move and don't tell your clerk, you ballot could arrive at your old address. This in and of itself isn't usually a huge issue — they are non-forwardable and get sent back to the clerk." If someone does gets the wrong ballot mailed to them and then tries to impersonate that voter, that fraud is detectable by signature matching and other security policies.

"The fact is that mail ballot fraud on the scale that people are warning of is just not practical or economical," Kline said. "People say 'ripe for fraud' because nobody has figured out how to do it on a large scale, but they think it's still possible and are trying to keep the argument alive."

Read More

silhouettes of people arguing in front of an America flag
Pict Rider/Getty Images

'One side will win': The danger of zero-sum framings

Elwood is the author of “Defusing American Anger” and hosts thepodcast “People Who Read People.”

Recently, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was surreptitiously recorded at a private event saying, about our political divides, that “one side or the other is going to win.” Many people saw this as evidence of his political bias. In The Washington Post, Perry Bacon Jr. wrote that he disagreed with Alito’s politics but that the justice was “right about the divisions in our nation today.” The subtitle of Bacon’s piece was: “America is in the middle of a nonmilitary civil war, and one side will win.”

It’s natural for people in conflict to see it in “us versus them” terms — as two opposing armies facing off against each other on the battlefield. That’s what conflict does to us: It makes us see things through war-colored glasses.

Keep ReadingShow less
Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump shaking hands

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the 2019 G20 summit in Oasaka, Japan.

Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images

Trump is a past, present and future threat to national security

Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

Psychological scientists who study human behavior concur that past actions are the best predictor of future actions. If past actions caused no problem, then all is well. If, however, a person demonstrated poor behavior in the past, well, buckle up. The odds are very great the person will continue to perform poorly if given the chance.

Donald Trump’s past behavior regarding just one area of protecting American citizens — specifically national defense — tells us that if he becomes the 47th president, we’re in a heap of trouble. Examining Trump’s past national security endeavors needs to be seriously examined by Americans before voting on Nov. 5.

Keep ReadingShow less
Caped person standing on a mountain top
RyanKing999/Getty Images

It takes a team

Molineaux is the lead catalyst for American Future, a research project that discovers what Americans prefer for their personal future lives. The research informs community planners with grassroots community preferences. Previously, Molineaux was the president/CEO of The Bridge Alliance.

We love heroic leaders. We admire heroes and trust them to tackle our big problems. In a way, we like the heroes to take care of those problems for us, relieving us of our citizen responsibilities. But what happens when our leaders fail us? How do we replace a heroic leader who has become bloated with ego? Or incompetent?

Heroic leaders are good for certain times and specific challenges, like uniting people against a common enemy. We find their charisma and inspiration compelling. They help us find our courage to tackle things together. We become a team, supporting the hero’s vision.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump attends the first day of the 2024 Republican National Convention at Milwaukee on July 15.

Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

A presidential assassination attempt offers a time to reflect

Nye is the president and CEO of the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress and a former member of Congress from Virginia.

In the wake of an assassination attempt on an American presidential candidate, we are right to take a moment to reflect on the current trajectory of our politics, as we reject violence as an acceptable path and look for ways to cool the kinds of political rhetoric that might radicalize Americans to the point of normalizing brute force in our politics.

Even though the motivations of the July 13 shooter are yet unclear, it’s worth taking a moment to try to reset ourselves and make an earnest effort to listen to our better angels. However, unless we change the way we reward politicians in our electoral system, it is very likely that the opportunity of this moment to calm our politics will be lost, like many others before it.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing near 4 American flags

American flags fly near Washington Monument.

Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images

A personal note to America in troubled times

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

I wanted to address Americans after the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump. Consider this a personal note directly to you (yes, you, the reader!). And know that I have intentionally held off in expressing my thoughts to allow things to settle a bit. There’s already too much noise enveloping our politics and lives.

Like most Americans, I am praying for the former president, his family and all those affected by last weekend’s events. There is no room for political violence in our nation.

Keep ReadingShow less