Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump takes back openness to helping USPS as House steps in

Donald Trump, Fox and Friends, Postal Service,  mail voting

President Trump used a favorite venue Monday to sow fresh confusion about his vote-by-mail views.

Fox News

President Trump on Monday dismissed the Democratic congressional push to prop up the Postal Service as a "con game" and rebuffed the notion he is out to undermine the reliability of the mail ahead of an election counting on mail service as never before.

His comments sowed fresh confusion about whether he will agree to the cash infusion USPS says it needs to assure the timely delivery and return of tens of millions of ballot envelopes this fall. At the same time, he signaled support for cuts the post office has made this summer, which are prompting the House to return to Washington in a few days to pass legislation countermanding those moves.

"It's been run horribly. And we're going to make it good," Trump said on "Fox and Friends." "Now what am I supposed to do? Let it continue to run badly? So if you fix it, they say, 'Oh he's tampering with the election.' No, we're not tampering."


The president's latest comments underscore how there looks to be no easy or quick end to the fight over the Postal Service's capacity to fulfill its vital role in the democratic process this year. Democrats say Trump is out to sabotage the agency to sow doubt about the reliability of an election where he's now the underdog. The president insists he's out to prevent massive election cheating, which almost no one outside his orbit suspects.

Democrats have advocated giving $25 billion to USPS in the next legislative package to prop up the economy during the coronavirus pandemic, but before negotiations broke down last week they had tentatively agreed to $10 billion. (This is separate from the $3.5 billion the states requested to help them conduct a presidential election made much more complex by the pandemic.)

Trump himself on Saturday, and his chief of staff Mark Meadows on Sunday, expressed a willingness to provide additional funds to the USPS, maybe even in a bill separate from the stalled stimulus package. But the president on Monday dismissed those figures as politically motivated.

"This is a con game" by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Trump said, claiming without evidence that what they want is to pump federal money into only the blue states.

USPS sent letters at the end of July warning election officials in 40 states — including every potential presidential battleground — that their deadlines for requesting and returning absentee ballots were "incongruous" with the current state of mail service and that voters who act close to the cutoffs risk being disenfranchised. Six states and the District of Columbia received narrower warnings in part because their election procedures aren't finished, according to a comprehensive roster of the letters obtained by The Washington Post. Oregon, Nevada, New Mexico and Rhode Island did not get the warnings, apparently because the Postal Service doesn't feel stressed by their timetables.

Trump has been claiming for six months, without evidence, that remote voting routinely leads to massive fraud. He has sought to narrow that assertion in recent weeks, focusing his contempt on the small number of states — which have grown from five to 11 this year in response to the pandemic — that will proactively seek to deliver ballots to all the voters on their rolls this fall.

When Meadows was reminded on CNN yesterday that there's no evidence of widespread voter fraud in states that have relied on the mail for election in past years, his response was: "There's no evidence that there's not, either."

Meadows said the administration was willing to negotiate a USPS bailout separately in order to preserve the franchise for those who people who ask for and then receive an absentee ballot — including the president, who applied in Florida last week to vote for his own re-election that way, and millions of seniors, who not only have the highest turnout rates and tend to vote Republican but also are the group at the biggest risk for serious Covid-19 complications.

A potential bill to provide that money is not why Pelosi told House members on Sunday that they needed to return to the Capitol to vote on legislation, probably Saturday. Instead, the measure will order the Postal Service to return to the level of service it was maintaining at the start of the year.

House Democrats also demanded that the new postmaster general, major GOP donor and Trump friend Louis DeJoy, testify Auug. 24 at an emergency oversight hearing on mail delays.

In the name of stemming the longstanding flow of red ink at the post office, which has intensified during the pandemic, DeJoy had ordered cutbacks this summer including ending most overtime for postal workers, restrictions on delivery timetables and some shutdowns of mail-processing equipment. The removal of thousands of mailboxes was also underway, but over the weekend USPS announced a halt to that effort until after the election following complaints from customers and members of Congress.

"The postmaster general and top Postal Service leadership must answer to the Congress and the American people as to why they are pushing these dangerous new policies that threaten to silence the voices of millions, just months before the election," the Democrats said in announcing the new hearing date.

The hearing was moved up from the middle of September to the first day of the GOP convention. And a House vote this weekend will allow Democrats to highlight the issue right after the end of their nominating convention. But Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican, has sent senators home for a summer recess lasting until after Labor Day.

"What you are witnessing is a president of the United States who is doing everything he can to suppress the vote, make it harder for people to engage in mail-in balloting at a time when people will be putting their lives on the line by having to go out to a polling station and vote," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, the marquee speaker Monday night at a convention being held almost entirely virtually.

Sanders appeared on most of the Sunday TV news interview shows, while Meadows confined himself to CNN. "I'll give you that guarantee right now: The president of the United States is not going to interfere with anybody casting their vote in a legitimate way, whether it's the post office or anything else," he said.

The Postal Service is the country's most popular government agency, with 91 percent of Americans professing a favorable opinion in an April poll by the Pew Research Center.

Claim: Mail-in ballots can be sent to the wrong address. Fact check: False

"I Voted By Mail" cardSara Wilson, Medill School

Absentee voting refers to when a voter requests a ballot for an election and is then sent one in the mail. Vote-by-mail, which is what Sen. Tom Cotton is most likely referring to as "mass mail-in voting," is a system of sending every registered voter (an important distinction from "everyone") a ballot without a request. Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, Colorado, Hawaii, Utah, Washington and Oregon were already vote-by-mail states. But now California, Nevada and Vermont will also automatically send ballots to registered voters, while still having in-person options.

Vote-by-mail states send the ballot to the address on file in the voter registration database; the address was verified during the registration process. For example, in Colorado the ballot will be "sent to the mailing address you provided for your voter registration file." It's the voters' responsibility to update their address if they move.

These vote-by-mail states usually have the cleanest voter files because they interact with voters so regularly, according to Audrey Kline, the national policy director at the National Vote at Home Institute. Even if a ballot gets sent to the wrong address, it's most likely due to voter inaction rather than fraud.

"It's not like my ballot is going to end up in another city randomly," she wrote in an email. "Errors usually center around people not updating their voter registration before a ballot is mailed. So if you move and don't tell your clerk, you ballot could arrive at your old address. This in and of itself isn't usually a huge issue — they are non-forwardable and get sent back to the clerk." If someone does gets the wrong ballot mailed to them and then tries to impersonate that voter, that fraud is detectable by signature matching and other security policies.

"The fact is that mail ballot fraud on the scale that people are warning of is just not practical or economical," Kline said. "People say 'ripe for fraud' because nobody has figured out how to do it on a large scale, but they think it's still possible and are trying to keep the argument alive."

Read More

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Multi-colored speech bubbles overlapping.

Stanford’s Strengthening Democracy Challenge shows a key way to reduce political violence: reveal that most Americans reject it.

Getty Images, MirageC

In the Aftermath of Assassinations, Let’s Show That Americans Overwhelmingly Disapprove of Political Violence

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and the assassination of Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman only three months ago—questions inevitably arise about how to reduce the likelihood of similar heinous actions.

Results from arguably the most important study focused on the U.S. context, the Strengthening Democracy Challenge run by Stanford University, point to one straightforward answer: show people that very few in the other party support political violence. This approach has been shown to reduce support for political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Celebrating Congressional Excellence: Democracy Awards 2025
United States Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Celebrating Congressional Excellence: Democracy Awards 2025

In a moment of bipartisan celebration, the Congressional Management Foundation (CMF) will honor the winners of its 2025 Democracy Awards, spotlighting congressional offices that exemplify outstanding public service, operational excellence, and innovation in governance.

The ceremony, scheduled for this Thursday, September 18, 2025, in Washington, D.C., will recognize both Republican and Democratic offices across multiple categories, reinforcing the idea that excellence in Congress transcends party lines.

Keep ReadingShow less