Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

States Ask Social Media Titans to Drop TurboVote

The bipartisan association of state election officials is urging Facebook and Twitter to end their relationships with TurboVote, an independent nonprofit voter registration site, concluding its flaws outweighed its contributions to a surge in turnout for the 2018 midterm election.

The National Association of Secretaries of State, whose members oversee elections in all 50 states, says TurboVote occasionally failed to properly process registrations and sometimes failed to notify people who thought they had registered to vote but had not completed the requisite forms. The TurboVote website also crashed under the weight of significant user volume during a voter registration campaign in September. And according to Pro Publica, which reported the NASS request, TurboVote's operators were scammed by someone pretending to be an employee and seeking to convince newly registered voters to share personal information over the phone.


TurboVote, created in 2012 by the nonprofit organization Democracy Works, says it is working to fix its flaws but has helped "millions register and vote nationwide." NASS asked TurboVote to provide a detailed accounting of these registrants — new voters, not duplicates or people changing their address — but has yet to receive one.

The secretaries of state have asked the social media companies to direct prospective voters to government registration sites. Both Facebook and Twitter said they were taking the NASS request seriously but were not yet committed to ending their relationships with TurboVote.


Read More

Hand placing VOTE sticker on shirt

Hand placing VOTE sticker on shirt

Photo provided

The Latino Vote Keeps Changing. Why Do We Keep Calling It a Realignment?

After the 2024 presidential election, the headlines suggested that Latino voters were moving toward the Republican Party. Donald Trump’s gains were interpreted as evidence of a possible political realignment, particularly among working-class Latino voters and younger men.

Two years later, the story has reversed. Latino voters, we are told, are returning to the Democrats.

Keep ReadingShow less
President Donald Trump and Stephen Miller

President Donald Trump departs a roundtable discussion on cybercrime with White House Deputy Chief of Staff and Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller (R) in the East Room of the White House on October 21, 2026, in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Trump’s Elevation of Stephen Miller Proves His Promise to Work With Democrats Is a Farce

In the immediate aftermath of Tuesday’s sweeping midterm election losses, a chastened President Donald Trump struck an unusually conciliatory tone, signaling a willingness to work with Democrats. But the spirit of bipartisanship proved fleeting.

By forcing out Susie Wiles and elevating Stephen Miller to White House Chief of Staff, Trump has delivered a definitive, defiant message to the American electorate: the era of uncompromising grievance and division isn't over—it is being supercharged.

Keep ReadingShow less
economics graph on blackboard

economics graph on blackboard

Getty Images

What Post-1971 Supply-side Economics Has Done to Veterans

Post-1971 supply-side economics—often referred to as "trickle-down economics" or "Reaganomics” fundamentally transformed the relationship between the federal government and military veterans. The year 1971 marked the end of the Bretton Woods system, the closing of the gold window, and a pivot toward neoliberal economic frameworks that prioritized deregulation, sweeping tax cuts, and aggressive federal deficit reduction via domestic spending cuts.

For veterans, who had previously benefited from the expansive, New Deal-style social investments of the original G.I. Bill, this macroeconomic paradigm shift led to four distinct structural consequences:

Keep ReadingShow less
Bank sign
The bank of ornate classical columns and facade
Photo by Leo_Visions on Unsplash

A Bank Account Should Not Come with a Political Litmus Test

The ongoing appetite for "debanking"—pressuring financial institutions to cut off customers because of who they are, what they believe, or with whom they associate—should concern everyone. Why? Because in the end, anyone can become an easy target.

One pressure point has been protests against private banks whose customers are companies who build or operate immigration detention facilities under contracts with the Trump administration. The Boston area saw such protests earlier this year, and there have been others.

Keep ReadingShow less