Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

With Election Day looming, Vote.org promises ‘We’ll be there’ to support voters

Andrea Hailey

New voting laws are "death by a thousand cuts," said Vote.org CEO Andrea Hailey (right), who spoke at the When We All Vote Inaugural Culture Of Democracy Summit in June with When We All Vote Executive Director Stephanie Young.

Kevin Winter/Getty Images

With less than a week remaining for all ballots to be cast, one of the nation’s premier voter engagement organizations is in the final stages of its efforts to maintain the record turnout from the two previous elections.

Vote.org, which runs voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts, has seen tremendous use of its services even after Americans broke a 100-year-old midterm turnout record in 2018, said CEO Andrea Hailey.

“In key states like Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania ... we’ve seen over 100 percent growth compared to 2018,” Hailey said. “It’s about 91 percent of the traffic that we saw in 2018, but in key states we’re seeing these huge increases.”


Those states and others such as Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina and Ohio are home to hard-fought races for Senate and governor that will decide the direction of federal and state policymaking for years to come.

The final days of election season will feature a focus on voter education, as well as a continuation of ongoing outreach efforts.

“Now that we’re touching one in five Americans, we need to make sure we remain a trusted source of information,” Hailey said, specifically noting the confusing nature of provisional ballots. “On election night we’ll be there to ensure people understand what’s happening.”

With states changing their election laws in the wake of the 2020 presidential contest, which was the subject of false allegations of fraud by supporters of Donald Trump, Vote.org has had to adjust its plans accordingly.

“It was frustrating. On the heels of the highest turnout we’ve seen in 100 years, it was sad. We should have been celebrating but we saw hundreds of voter bills circulating,” Hailey said.

She referred to such bills as “death by a thousand cuts,” claiming they are a collection of efforts to limit who votes.

Hailey pointed to the “wet signature” laws passed in Texas and Georgia that require people to print, sign with ink (hence the wet signature) and mail voter registration forms rather than completing an online form.

“When we have the technology and know it’s working, to say digital signature is no longer valid is preposterous,” she said. “That directly affected our users. We could no longer provide the tool.”

Some of the group’s resources in the coming days will be applied to combating misinformation even though Hailey believes that problem isn’t as intense now as it was in 2020 when voting by mail was the subject of harmful disinformation.

“I’m concerned when people say preemptively that they’re going to contest elections if they don’t win,” Hailey said, noting her organization has a partnership with Twitter to provide nonpartisan information. “We’ll be ready to respond with the facts and the actual truth.”

Up until these final days of the campaign, the focus has been on registering voters and encouraging them to cast ballots. Hailey said Vote.org had more users than all previous years combined in 2020, and while it may not match those numbers, there are other areas of growth.

“Our get-out-the-vote program this election is much larger,” she said, explaining the organization has focused on engaging young voters and communities of color – reaching 60 million people through its radio program alone.

Vote.org has created a multipronged approach to reaching those communities: advertising (digital, streaming services, student newspapers) and partnerships (WhatsApp, Pinterest, the NAACP’s Youth & College program, the College Board, and universities). There has been an 11 percent increase in the use of the Vote.org platform by members of Generation Z and millennials, according to the group’s representatives.

The group has also recruited influencers who have helped spread the word about voting, including Taylor Swift and Josh Gad.

“There are only 20 midnights until the 2022 United States Midterm Elections on November 8,” Swift wrote in an Instagram story last month that linked to Vote.org. (Her newly released album is titled “Midnights.”) She also used the post to encourage early voting.

Gad has also used his social media platforms to encourage voting in the final days before Nov. 8.

A secondary level of outreach includes a series of partnerships with micro influencers supporting efforts on a state-by-state basis as well as YouTube gamers who agreed to use portions of their videos to encourage voting.


Read More

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

A woman sifts through the rubble in her house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

This question is not an exercise in double-talk. It is critical to understand the power that our Constitution grants exclusively to Congress, and the power that resides in the President as Commander-in-Chief of the military.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not have that power. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 recognizes that distribution of power by saying that a President can only introduce military force into an existing or imminent hostility if Congress has declared war or specifically authorized the President to use military force, or there is a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less
Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less