Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

N.Y. absentee rules are unfair to the blind, federal complaint says

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo

Earlier this month, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued an executive order expanding absentee voting, but disability advocacy organizations say it discriminates against voters who are blind.

Matthew Cavanaugh/Getty Images

New York's new absentee voting rules discriminate against the blind, a coalition of disability advocacy groups says in asking the Justice Department to intervene.

Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced this month that absentee balloting will be wide open to all voters in the June 23 primaries, the biggest state to expand voting by mail in its partisan contests in order to maintain social distancing while participating in democracy during the coronavirus pandemic.

But requiring voters to use paper ballots is discriminatory because that prevents blind people from voting "privately and independently," the complaint filed Tuesday says.


While an expansion of mail-in voting is certainly needed given the public health crisis, the organizations say, alternate methods are required to permit the disabled to cast ballots safely and securely.

The needs of the disabled, who sometimes require special equipment and other accommodations, and the inability of election officials to contact the homeless are two of the main reasons cited by groups working to tamp down on calls for making voting by mail virtually universal nationwide — starting with a big increase this November.

Cuomo's executive order allows all New Yorkers to vote absentee as long as they request an application online, by mail or over the phone in time for the primary, when nominees for Congress, the Legislature and many school boards and local offices will be decided. It is for now a one-time exception to state law, which permits absentee voting only for people who claim an excuse such as age, disability or travel. New York is one of 16 states that have such an excuse requirement.

But the complainants say Cuomo's order fails to provide people with disabilities equal access to the ballot box, as required by federal law. It asks the Justice Department to instruct the New York Board of Elections to provide online or other accommodations consistent with the Americans With Disabilities Act.

The complaint was filed by the American Council for the Blind, the National Center on Independent Living and the New York Association on Independent Living.

"People who are blind should not have to be exposed to the virus unnecessarily by voting in person," said ACB President Dan Spoone. "Just as all other New York residents have the right to vote via absentee ballot, the state must provide an accessible voting method that blind residents can use remotely."

The technology exists for the visually impaired to vote online in a secure manner, so states "have no excuse when arguing the difficulty of providing accessible absentee voting systems," said Karen Blachowicz, president of ACB's New York affiliate.


Read More

People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less