Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Nebraska the first red state sending mail-in-vote applications to everyone

Nebraska flag
Oleksii Liskonih/Getty Images

Applications for a mail-in ballot will be sent to all 1.2 million registered voters in Nebraska.

It's the ninth state to make such a move in an effort to promote remote voting because of the coronavirus pandemic. But it's by far the most Republican state to do so, notable given President Trump's persistent and false claims that widespread voting by mail guarantees widespread fraud.


"For voters who have concerns about voting at the polls in November, an early ballot request for a mail-in ballot is a good option," GOP Secretary of State Bob Evnen said in announcing the mailing Wednesday.

Nebraskans will have until 11 days before the election to send back the request form, but the Postal Service says completed ballots should be in the mail a week earlier to be confident of arriving in time to be counted. Voters can also drop off envelopes at polling places or cast ballots in person Nov. 3.

The state also sent mail ballot applications to voters for the May primary and nearly 384,000 voted that way — a record 78 percent of all votes cast.

Republican nominees generally capture about three-fifths of the statewide vote, as Trump did four years ago. But Nebraska is one of just two states (along with Maine) that award an electoral vote to the winner of each congressional district, and polling suggests the district seat centered on Omaha is up for grabs — in part because the House race itself is a tossup.

The other states sending vote-by-mail applications statewide are battlegrounds Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa — and reliably blue Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland and New Mexico.

California, Nevada, New Jersey, Vermont, Washington, D.C. and virtually every county in Montana have gone a step further and decided to mail every voter an absentee ballot — joining five states that planned to do so before Covid-19: Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Utah and Washington.


Read More

U.S. Rep. David Valadao (R-CA)

U.S. Rep. David Valadao (R-CA) at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. House Republicans

(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Democrats Gerrymandered David Valadao’s District. Did It Backfire?

GOP US Rep. David Valadao has never won his seat in Congress on Republican votes alone because too few Republicans live in the district where he was raised, lives, and runs his family farm.

- YouTube youtu.be

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

Getty Images

Birthright Citizenship Explained: History, SCOTUS Rulings & Executive Orders

Birthright citizenship has been part of American law for more than 150 years. As the American public continues to see challenges against its constitutionality, brought on by the Trump administration, it is important to remember why.

After the Civil War, Congress adopted the 14th Amendment in 1868 to overturn Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had denied citizenship to Black Americans, dampening their federal protections. While the 13th amendment had abolished slavery a few years earlier, Free Black Americans were considered noncitizens by many, and thus had to work around a separate set of laws, meaning they could never be fully integrated as members of American society. In response to this issue, the 14th Amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scales of justice
a golden scale with an eagle on top of it

A Real Test for “Lawfare” Must Protect Allies and Enemies Alike

“Lawfare” is becoming a word that ends arguments instead of clarifying them. When Donald Trump or his allies are prosecuted, many on the right call the case political. When the Trump administration investigates critics, many on the left call it retaliation or “score-settling.” Sometimes those accusations are justified. Sometimes they are partisan reflexes. A label that changes with the identity of the defendant is not a rule of law.

The hard cases are not the ones with a public order to punish an enemy. They are cases with mixed facts: a real investigative predicate, a politically active target, disputed timing, later changes in treatment, and no contemporaneous record the public can inspect. Those cases require something better than “trust the prosecutors” or “trust the accused.” They require an auditable standard.

Keep ReadingShow less