Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Severe weather, virus worries disrupt the gears of democracy on Super Tuesday

Debris from Nashville tornado

Deadly storms swept through Tennessee last night and left residents with worries other than voting.

Brett Carlsen/Getty Images

Deadly storms in at least two Super Tuesday states and coronavirus anxieties nationwide are complicating efforts to boost turnout and ease confidence in the results from the nation's most important day of voting ahead of November.

Efforts to get democracy working more smoothly are almost always focused on human behavior, from making it easier for people to vote to rewarding collaboration among partisan politicians. This time, unpredictably treacherous weather and the unpredictable spread of disease are conspiring to make things much more difficult for Democrats casting ballots to award a third of their presidential delegates.


Voting rights groups were focused on Tennessee, where tornadoes ripped through parts of the state a few hours before the polls were set to open, shattering buildings and killing at least 22 people. Some polling sites in Nashville as well as in Davidson and Wilson counties opened an hour late but were still set to close on time at 8 p.m. EST, Republican Secretary of State Tre Hargett announced. And with 15 voting venues in the state's biggest city out of commission, the people who showed up were told they could cast ballots instead at pair of "supersites" in minimally damaged neighborhoods.

"Of course we want people to exercise caution," GOP Gov. Bill Lee said at a news conference. "We also want folks to exercise their rights to get out there and vote. It's a very important day for that. So, we're going to make it possible for as many folks as we can to vote — and wherever we find a polling station that there's a problem, we're reaching out to correct that."

The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a Washington-based nonprofit, said the steps Tennessee was taking were insufficient and the group was headed to court in hopes of getting the primary extended through the end of the week.

Similar efforts were being planned in Alabama, where tornado warnings were issued in at least five counties in the central part of the state and a handful of polling places were reportedly without electricity during a morning marked by drenching thunderstorms.

In both states, poll workers in rural areas were being told to take extra precaution because of potential flash flooding this evening if their responsibilities included taking results by hand from their precincts to a central county office — potentially delaying the results from states with 116 delegates at stake.

The National Weather Service said severe thunderstorms, wind damage and more tornadoes were also possible in parts of two other states voting Tuesday, Virginia and North Carolina, while severe storms that could cause large hail, damaging winds and a tornado are possible in central Texas the final few hours before the polls close in the second-biggest prize of the day. Texas' 228 delegates are exceeded only by the 415 in California, where weather did not seem to be a concern.

Fourteen states have presidential primaries now underway. And this is not the first time severe weather has struck on Super Tuesday. Twelve years ago, when two dozen states had primaries and caucuses on Feb. 5, dozens of tornadoes were reported in 10 of those states, killing 57 people.

Back then, though, there was no COVID-19. In California's Solano County, where the country's first case of the virus' spread within a community was identified, there are new curbside sites where people could drop off their ballots Tuesday without having to leave their cars.

The state also allows people to vote through the mail so long as their ballots are postmarked by election day, and residents were being urged to take advantage of that option as another precaution against the virus — further increasing the likelihood that final results there won't be known for days. Almost 75 percent of the state's voters received absentee ballots.

For those who still want to vote in person in Sacramento County, for example, election officials distributed to all the polling sites hand sanitizer, wipes and latex gloves thin enough for use with touch-screen voting machines.

The elections director in Falls Church, a Virginia suburb of Washington, also laid on big supplies of hand sanitizer and disinfectant wipes and told poll workers to frequently wipe down the booths and pens touched by voters. But the official, Dave Bjerke, said all his poll workers had promised to show up.

Read More

An oversized ballot box surrounded by people.

Young people worldwide form new parties to reshape politics—yet America’s two-party system blocks them.

Getty Images, J Studios

No Country for Young Politicians—and How To Fix That

In democracies around the world, young people have started new political parties whenever the establishment has sidelined their views or excluded them from policymaking. These parties have sometimes reinvigorated political competition, compelled established parties to take previously neglected issues seriously, or encouraged incumbent leaders to find better ways to include and reach out to young voters.

In Europe, a trio in their twenties started Volt in 2017 as a pan-European response to Brexit, and the party has managed to win seats in the European Parliament and in some national legislatures. In Germany, young people concerned about climate change created Klimaliste, a party committed to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as per the Paris Agreement. Although the party hasn’t won seats at the federal level, they have managed to win some municipal elections. In Chile, leaders of the 2011 student protests, who then won seats as independent candidates, created political parties like Revolución Democrática and Convergencia Social to institutionalize their movements. In 2022, one of these former student leaders, Gabriel Boric, became the president of Chile at 36 years old.

Keep ReadingShow less
How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

Demonstrators gather outside of The United States Supreme Court during an oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford to call for an end to partisan gerrymandering on October 3, 2017 in Washington, DC

Getty Images, Olivier Douliery

How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground. ~ Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Col. Edward Carrington, Paris, 27 May 1788

The Problem We Face

The U.S. House of Representatives was designed as the chamber of Congress most directly tethered to the people. Article I of the Constitution mandates that seats be apportioned among the states according to population and that members face election every two years—design features meant to keep representatives responsive to shifting public sentiment. Unlike the Senate, which prioritizes state sovereignty and representation, the House translates raw population counts into political voice: each House district is to contain roughly the same number of residents, ensuring that every citizen’s vote carries comparable weight. In principle, then, the House serves as the nation’s demographic mirror, channeling the diverse preferences of the electorate into lawmaking and acting as a safeguard against unresponsive or oligarchic governance.

Nationally, the mismatch between the overall popular vote and the partisan split in House seats is small, with less than a 1% tilt. But state-level results tell a different story. Take Connecticut: Democrats hold all five seats despite Republicans winning over 40% of the statewide vote. In Oklahoma, the inverse occurs—Republicans control every seat even though Democrats consistently earn around 40% of the vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.
A pile of political buttons sitting on top of a table

Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.

Once again, politicians are trying to choose their voters to guarantee their own victories before the first ballot is cast.

In the latest round of redistricting wars, Texas Republicans are attempting a rare mid-decade redistricting to boost their advantage ahead of the 2026 midterms, and Democratic governors in California and New York are signaling they’re ready to “fight fire with fire” with their own partisan gerrymanders.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

Wilson Deschine sits at the "be my voice" voter registration stand at the Navajo Nation annual rodeo, in Window Rock.

Getty Images, David Howells

Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

On July 24, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a Circuit Court order in a far-reaching case that could affect the voting rights of all Americans. Native American tribes and individuals filed the case as part of their centuries-old fight for rights in their own land.

The underlying subject of the case confronts racial gerrymandering against America’s first inhabitants, where North Dakota’s 2021 redistricting reduced Native Americans’ chances of electing up to three state representatives to just one. The specific issue that the Supreme Court may consider, if it accepts hearing the case, is whether individuals and associations can seek justice under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). That is because the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, contradicting other courts, said that individuals do not have standing to bring Section 2 cases.

Keep ReadingShow less