Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Vermont moves toward permanent vote-by-mail elections

Absentee ballots

Vermont was one of five states to switch to a primarily vote-by-mail system for the 2020 election.

Jason Redmond/Getty Images

After conducting a predominantly vote-by-mail election last year, Vermont lawmakers are looking to make that change permanent.

On Tuesday, the state Senate passed a bill to adopt universal mail voting for future general elections. Like the rest of the country, Vermont saw record-high turnout in the 2020 presidential election, and supporters of this measure attribute that success to expanded vote-by-mail access.

Vermont was one of five states (plus Washington, D.C.) that opted to mail every voter an absentee ballot for the 2020 election. With this legislation likely to succeed, Vermont is poised to be the first of these states to make primarily vote-by-mail elections a long-standing practice, joining five others that already had such systems prior to the Covid-19 pandemic.


The bill received bipartisan approval by the Senate in a virtual voice vote on Tuesday, with only two members voicing opposition. After a final Senate vote on Wednesday, the bill will be sent to the House, where it is expected to pass.

Republican Gov. Phil Scott said during a press conference Tuesday that he supports the bill, but doesn't think it does enough to expand the use of mail voting.

"My only concern is if we're going to do it for the general election, I'm wondering why not the other elections that we have?" Scott said. "And if it works for the general election, it should work for some of the others. So I would only ask that it get expanded in some capacity."

When the bill was being considered by the Senate Government Operations Committee, lawmakers decided against all vote-by-mail primaries, citing the partisan nature of get-out-the-vote efforts for that round of balloting.

The bill also gives municipalities the flexibility to send voters mail ballots for local elections and grants voters an opportunity to fix their mail ballots if they are "defective."

"When we make voting more accessible, more people vote. When we make voting more accessible, our democracy better represents the will of the people," Senate President Pro Tempore Becca Balint, a Democrat, said Tuesday on the virtual Senate floor.

Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Utah, and Washington were already running predominantly vote-by-mail elections prior to the pandemic.


Read More

Business meeting, blurred background and people in office for teamwork, collaboration and planning

Another recruitment drive won’t fix a nonprofit board. A practical guide to sharing real decision-making power with diverse members: acknowledge, affirm, act.

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

Before Recruiting Diverse Board Members, Examine Who Holds Power

Nonprofit leaders keep asking me where they will find the next generation of diverse board talent. My question is what those leaders will be allowed to change once they arrive. In this piece, I outline concrete steps boards can take to ensure diverse members have real opportunities to shape organizational decision-making and to translate good intentions into meaningful progress.

In my board service and consulting work, I hear the concern from executives and grassroots activists alike. They worry about recruiting successors, sustaining funding, and governing organizations whose work increasingly depends on partnerships beyond their own walls. I share those concerns. I also wonder whether another recruitment initiative will solve what troubles them.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

jimfeng/Getty Images

Pennsylvania’s Bipartisan Exchange Is Rebuilding Trust in Governance

The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics has nearly 40 years of experience working with legislators from different political parties, and it is building on this history by drawing on lessons from the successful American Congressional Exchange model, begun in 2018 at the Bipartisan Policy Center, and from state exchanges now underway in Minnesota and Michigan. The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, in collaboration with the Bridge Alliance, has launched the Pennsylvania Legislative Exchange.

This state-based, systematic approach is designed to foster better relationships and build trust across the political aisle with the following guiding principles:

Keep ReadingShow less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

DOJ lawsuits in Alaska and California preview post-Election Day fights over certification and seating winners. Here’s how officials and voters can prepare.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

The Lawsuits Will Lose. The Delays Will Still Win.

Less than two weeks before Election Day, President Trump’s Justice Department asked a federal court to stop Alaska from certifying its U.S. Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses to Democrat Mary Peltola. The lawsuit claims that a second candidate on the ballot, Daniel J. Sullivan, will confuse voters. That argument went nowhere in June, when the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the state had no legal way to remove him from the ballot. Asked about the suit, the president took credit. “I’m the one that said do it,” he told reporters.

Alongside the Alaska suit, the Trump administration sued California to keep the state from counting mail ballots from 20,000 people it calls “likely” noncitizens. Over the summer, the Department of Homeland Security put that number at 190,000. Legal experts expect both suits to fail, as so many suits like them have. Still, Alaska and California give us an early look at what the weeks after November 3rd could bring: recount demands, calls to review or throw out ballots, and pressure to delay seating winners.

Keep ReadingShow less