Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Standoff on timing of next stimulus masks debate over more election aid

Speaker Nancy Pelosi

Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday that Democrats are seeking an additional $1.6 billion for voting services necessitated by the coronavirus pandemic.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Top congressional Democrats are promising to include much more money for healthy elections in the next coronavirus response package they're pushing. But Republicans' resistance to quickly writing such a bill is intensifying, obscuring their level of interest in additional spending to expand voting by mail, early voting and online registration.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday the measure her House majority has started putting together would provide at least $1.6 billion on top of the $400 million included in the economic rescue package passed last week.

Dozens of groups advocating for voting rights and the broader democracy reform agenda have coalesced behind that funding level as their singular focus during the pandemic, arguing that conducting a normal and trustworthy election in November will be impossible otherwise.

But Republicans in control of the Senate say they're in no rush to draft another stimulus bill, and state officials say significant delay could make it impossible to spend additional aid in time.


The $2 trillion measure signed last Friday needs time to prove itself, Republicans say, and besides they're highly skeptical about Democrats' agenda, arguing the left wants to use the cover of the Covid-19 outbreak to advance a liberal agenda on all kinds of minimally connected fronts.

Complicating the prospects for additional election grants is resistance from President Trump, who lamented this week that making it too easy to vote would cripple the chances of Republican candidates.

On Thursday, two dozen progressive groups joined the two Democratic senators leading the drive for the money, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Ron Wyden of Oregon, to promise an intense lobbying push in the weeks ahead.

They expressed optimism GOP congressional leaders would support another wave of spending whenever they agree to move the next bill, in part because the top election officials in 28 states are Republicans and they're eager for the cash.

"I'm beginning to see a disconnect between conservatives at the state and local level and Republicans who have resisted this in Washington," Wyden said.

What those GOP officials don't want are accompanying federal requirements for liberalizing their voter registration or absentee ballot rules, even though many are preparing to do so. No such strings were attached to the first grants because new federal mandates on how the states and counties conduct elections are non-starters for Republican leaders, starting with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

"Offsetting the carbon footprint of airplanes, remaking our energy grid, or changing election laws, as Democrats have suggested, have nothing to do with our war against the disease," House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said in a statement.

The Brennan Center for Justice, one of the most prominent left-leaning democracy reform groups, came up with $2 billion as the high-end estimate of what it would cost to print return-postage-paid ballots, send them to all Americans who don't already vote at home, verify and count the ocean of paper that gets returned, stand up online registration in the 11 states that don't have it and assure hygienic polling stations for the small numbers who still vote in person early or on Nov. 3.

The estimate did not include additional costs that more than a dozen states now face from postponing their primaries and expanding absentee options for voting in those contests.

In addition, the Postal Service says the budget crisis it's facing because of the pandemic means it will not be capable of delivering and returning many millions of ballots unless it gets a significant bailout of its own.

Pelosi promised that would be part of the House's next stimulus package, not only to smooth commerce but also to ease the election.

"Vote by mail is so important to our democracy so that people have access to voting and not being deterred, especially at this time, by the admonition to stay home," Pelosi told reporters on a Wednesday conference call.

As for what Trump said Monday about election aid, the California Democrat said: "When the president says, 'if we have vote by mail we'll never elect another Republican,' I think that, first of all, it doesn't recognize that Republicans know how to vote by mail."

Although Congress is formally scheduled to reconvene in three weeks, that timetable was set before the Trump administration extended the nationwide period for social distancing until May 1. Odds are strong most members, except those with a hand in writing the next relief bill, will stay away from Washington until the measure is ready for a vote.


Read More

multiethnic American voters participating in the US election, showcasing the concept of choice in a democracy

Presidents who lost the popular vote often faced economic turmoil. See the pattern from Harrison to Trump and how a 50-state strategy could change it.

Alan Mazzocco/Getty Images

Path Forward from Economic Consequences of Non-Popular Vote Presidents

While losing the popular vote does not inherently cause economic ruin, the structural political weakness of entering office without a democratic majority mandate often compounded the economic challenges their administrations faced. These terms were marked by distinct economic hardships, structural imbalances, or severe financial crises.

Destabilizing Partisan Protectionism

Keep ReadingShow less
people filling out their ballots at voting booths and submitting their vote.

Independent voters may hand Democrats control of Congress this fall — but as history shows, they'll get nothing in return. Here's how to change that.

Pressmaster/Getty Images

Swinging Outcomes Is Not Enough

The midterms are six weeks away, and polls predict that independent voters, who broke for Donald Trump in 2024, are planning on voting for Democrats by wide margins. Among Latinos, the numbers are staggering, to the point that the Republican gerrymanders in Florida and Texas may actually result in Democratic victories.

If the Democrats take control of Congress, it will be because of independents. And what do independents get in return?

Keep ReadingShow less
Diverse People At Voting Booth. Vote Here Elections Sign

A political scientist examines how automatic voter registration is quietly turning non-affiliation into America's largest voting bloc.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images

When Neither Party Is the Default: Rethinking Representation As America’s Electorate Changes

For most of my career as a political scientist, representation was the central theme of my teaching and research. Early on, I studied how legislators understood their responsibilities to constituents — whether they saw themselves as delegates carrying out constituent mandates, trustees exercising independent judgment, or politicos combining both. That work asked a question that still matters: What does it mean to represent the public in a changing democracy?

Today I find myself asking a related question: What happens when the electorate changes but the institutions built to represent it do not?

Keep ReadingShow less
A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

How 9/11’s Memory Continues to Shape American Citizenship

Twenty‑five years after September 11th, the burden of that day continues to affect us in ways that are difficult to express. It was a moment of profound loss, but also one that revealed both the vulnerability and resilience of our national fabric. The memories remain vivid for many of us: where we were, what we felt, and how the world appeared to change in an instant. Even now, a quarter century later, the impact of that morning continues to shape how we understand our country, our responsibilities, and our relationships with one another.

To help us all reflect on that day, I invited four contributors to the Fulcrum to share reflections not to revisit the tragedy, but to commemorate the ways it has persisted in our consciousness twenty-five years later.

Keep ReadingShow less