Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Uncertainty envelops next week's Wisconsin primary

Wisconsin primary

This line at a fire station in Milwaukee during the 2018 midterm election will not be replicated during Wisconsin's April 7 primary because of the coronavirus — if the primary is even held as scheduled.

Darren Hauck/Getty Imags

Eight days to the Wisconsin primary and almost every aspect of it remains up in the air, from the rules for how people will vote to whether the election will even take place.

The state, which already looms as the essential presidential battleground in November, has quickly become the heart of the national debate about the propriety of voting during a pandemic. It is the only state that has not in some way delayed an April presidential primary, the main rationale being that some state and local contests on the ballot are for jobs that become vacant without a timely election.

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers shifted course Friday and, after saying the polls should be open April 7 as usual, proposed that 3.3 million ballots be printed and delivered to every voter in the state in time for them to be filled in and sent back on schedule. Republicans in charge of the Legislature, who would have to pass a bill for that to happen, said the idea was a logistical impossibility.


A federal judge on Saturday consolidated three lawsuits filed against the state — efforts to postpone the primary altogether or at least relax the rules to make absentee voting easier for more people. The judge promised to rule on these requests in time.

Another federal judge on Friday dismissed Green Bay's bid to delay the election because of concerns about the safety of government employees, poll workers and voters.

Judge William Griesbach said cities lacked authority to bring such lawsuits, but he added that his decision "is not intended to minimize the serious difficulties the city and its officials are facing in attempting to conduct the upcoming election."

Wisconsin is not only an important place in Democratic presidential politics, with 84 pledged delegates at stake, but any changes in the voting process now could still be in place in November, when Wisconsin's 10 electoral votes will be top of mind for both nominees. Donald Trump won the state by just 23,000 votes last time, breaking a seven-election winning streak for the Democrats.

The most sweeping suit before U.S. District Judge William Conley seeks to have the primary delayed at least until the governor lifts his emergency order closing most schools and businesses and requiring most people to stay at home. That's not likely before May given President Trump's decision Sunday to extend federal social distancing guidelines through the end of April.

Another suit, filed on behalf of elderly people living alone and at highest risk of getting sick, wants to eliminate the requirement that a witness must sign all mail-in ballots. The third suit seeks to extend online registration times and suspend the requirement that people provide a photo ID and proof of residency, such as a utility bill, to register.

Conley signaled Monday he'd have a hearing Wednesday and told the Wisconsin Election Commission to explain by Monday night why the primary should not be delayed.

As of Monday morning the state had more than 1,100 confirmed Covid-19 cases and at least 20 deaths. It also had sent more than 848,000 absentee ballots to voters and seen nearly 252,000 returned, already a record for a springtime election in Wisconsin.

Day's end is the deadline for voters to register online if they want to cast an absentee ballot and Thursday is the deadline for requesting one.

"Even he knows that's not logistically feasible," state Senate GOP Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald said of Evers' plan to rush out vote-by-mail forms. "Acting like this is doable is a hoax."

The current back-and-forth has totally overshadowed the big voting rights issue in Wisconsin before the novel coronavirus — whether to purge more than 200,000 names from the registration rolls, a matter that has been tied up in court for months and is now on hold.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, the conservative think tank leading that effort, said that Evers' proposal "might make sense if the Wisconsin Elections Commission kept the voter rolls clean and up to date, but we know that it does not."

Read More

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’
Independent Voter News

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’

The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation.

The Princeton Gerrymandering Project developed a “Redistricting Report Card” that takes metrics of partisan and racial performance data in all 50 states and converts it into a grade for partisan fairness, competitiveness, and geographic features.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Vote Here" sign

America’s political system is broken — but ranked choice voting and proportional representation could fix it.

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Election Reform Turns Down the Temperature of Our Politics

Politics isn’t working for most Americans. Our government can’t keep the lights on. The cost of living continues to rise. Our nation is reeling from recent acts of political violence.

79% of voters say the U.S. is in a political crisis, and 64% say our political system is too divided to solve the nation’s problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. President Barack Obama speaking on the phone in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Barack Obama talks President Barack Obama talks with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a phone call from the Oval Office on November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, The White House

‘Obama, You're 15 Years Too Late!’

The mid-decade redistricting fight continues, while the word “hypocrisy” has become increasingly common in the media.

The origin of mid-decade redistricting dates back to the early history of the United States. However, its resurgence and legal acceptance primarily stem from the Texas redistricting effort in 2003, a controversial move by the Republican Party to redraw the state's congressional districts, and the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. This decision, which confirmed that mid-decade redistricting is not prohibited by federal law, was a significant turning point in the acceptance of this practice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of a person casting a ballot at a polling station during voting.

Gerrymandering silences communities and distorts elections. Proportional representation offers a proven path to fairer maps and real democracy.

Getty Images, bizoo_n

Gerrymandering Today, Gerrymandering Tomorrow, Gerrymandering Forever

In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace declared, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." (Watch the video of his speech.) As a politically aware high school senior, I was shocked by the venom and anger in his voice—the open, defiant embrace of systematic disenfranchisement, so different from the quieter racism I knew growing up outside Boston.

Today, watching politicians openly rig elections, I feel that same disbelief—especially seeing Republican leaders embrace that same systematic approach: gerrymandering now, gerrymandering tomorrow, gerrymandering forever.

Keep ReadingShow less