Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Washington will be 20th state where felons can vote right after prison

Jay Inslee

The bill to restore voting rights to former felons now awaits Washington Gov. Jay Inslee's signature.

John Moore/Getty Images

Washington is poised to become the latest state to expand the voting rights of formerly incarcerated felons.

The state Senate on Wednesday voted 27-22 to approve a bill that would restore voting rights to 20,000 felons on probation and parole. The state House passed the bill last month, so it now heads to Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee, who is expected to sign it. At that point, Washington will join 19 other states in automatically restoring voting rights to people with felony convictions upon release from prison.

Returning the ballot to ex-convicts, who are disproportionately Black and Latino, is a cause that's generated a steady string of victories even as legislation to limit minority voting rights has gained traction nationally. The developments in Olympia come a week after Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam used an executive order restoring the franchise to 69,000 felons in Virginia and anyone released from prison in the future.


Within weeks, 18 states will prevent felons from voting until they have finished their full sentence, including probation or parole and in 11 others there will be additional requirements.

Once Washington's measure takes effect, released felons will need to register again, even if they were registered prior to conviction.

The effort to pass this bill was led by Democratic Rep. Tarra Simmons, the first formerly incarcerated person in Washington to be elected to the Legislature.

"At a time when many states are actively working to restrict voting rights, Washington state has been working to expand access to democracy," said Democratic Sen. Patty Kuderer, who co-sponsored the bill with Simmons.

Sean Morales-Doyle, deputy director of the Voting Rights and Elections Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, said this bill is a positive step toward racial justice in voting. Black people are four times more likely to be incarcerated in Washington than people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds.

"Allowing people with past criminal convictions to vote is pivotal in welcoming them as full members of their communities. When individuals feel included in society, they have more success in building lives for themselves and their families," Morales-Doyle said.


Read More

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

A woman sifts through the rubble in her house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

This question is not an exercise in double-talk. It is critical to understand the power that our Constitution grants exclusively to Congress, and the power that resides in the President as Commander-in-Chief of the military.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not have that power. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 recognizes that distribution of power by saying that a President can only introduce military force into an existing or imminent hostility if Congress has declared war or specifically authorized the President to use military force, or there is a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less
Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less