Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

If it’s Biden vs. Trump…will Americans tune out the next election?

If it’s Biden vs. Trump…will Americans tune out the next election?

President Donald Trump speaks during the first presidential debate with former Vice President Joe Biden at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio on Tuesday, Sept. 29, 2020.

Photo by Melina Mara/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Davies is a journalist and podcaster. He runs the podcast consultancy, DaviesContent and co-hosts “How Do We Fix It?” and “Let’s Find Common Ground.”

It’s really difficult to get excited about the next election— now less than 18 months away. The prospect of two old men facing each other for a rematch may do more to depress voter turnout than anything cooked up by opponents of electoral reform.


Both Biden and Trump are overwhelming favorites to win their parties’ nominations. But seven-in-ten Americans don’t want the President to run again. And Trump’s disapproval ratings are even worse than Biden’s.

Despite enormous issues at stake, including the very survival of our democratic system, many millions of Americans may turn away from politics altogether during the long, exhausting campaign.

With Joe Biden running for re-election his party faces an enthusiasm gap. That may have a decisive impact on turnout. A Washington Post poll this month found that 63 percent of voters don’t believe that he “has the mental sharpness it takes to serve effectively as president.”

The same poll asked Democratic-leaning voters: “would you like the Democratic Party to nominate Biden to run for a second term as president in 2024, or would you like… someone other than Biden as its candidate for president?” 58 percent want an alternative candidate.

This may help explain why, despite his manifest and alarming flaws, Donald Trump appears to be ahead of the President in a hypothetical rematch.

Many Democrats are resigned to supporting the President’s re-election bid. “Biden’s reelection is predicated on his ability to win over a significant number of voters who don’t think highly of him, but who think even less highly of Trump,” wrote Amy Walter in The Cook Political Report. “The hope among Democrats is that the risk of nominating an 82-year-old candidate is just slightly less risky than the one Republicans are taking if they nominate Trump.”

But many party professionals are worried about how Biden will fare during speeches, interviews, and debates during a long campaign. He often slurs his words, mumbles or looks confused. The President seems frail.

By contrast, “Donald Trump is, as a performer, in a class of his own,” wrote journalist and blogger, Andrew Sullivan after the New Hampshire town hall event last week on CNN. Political pundits said Trump appeared energized and in command. “He may be one of the most effective and pathological demagogues I’ve ever encountered: capable of lying with staggering sincerity, of making up stories with panache: shameless, and indefatigable,” said Sullivan.

The 2024 political season is just beginning. A great deal may change. But if you feel disenchanted and depressed by the choice voters may well be presented with, you are not alone.


Read More

Poll: Voters Want Solutions for Government Corruption
Greggory DiSalvo/Getty

Poll: Voters Want Solutions for Government Corruption

A new Brennan Center survey finds that large majorities of Republicans, Democrats, and independents share deep-seated concerns about government corruption, which most voters define broadly and blame for many of the country’s biggest problems going unaddressed. The survey, fielded to 2,000 registered voters across the country between April 28 and May 6, also finds widespread support for key anticorruption reforms, such as new limits on money in elections and stronger protections against self-dealing by high-ranking government officials.

The key findings include:

Keep ReadingShow less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

The Rule of Law depends on action, not blind optimism. Explore how critical hope, civic engagement, and accountability can strengthen democracy.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

Only Collective Action Can Turn Outrage Into Accountability and Protect the Rule of Law

The past year has shaken our faith in institutions and, perhaps, in each other. If not already eviscerated, the Rule of Law is under attack. In this atmosphere of constant chaos, we have become numbed by the events of each day and the scope of unprecedented executive action. Yet, even in the face of growing autocracy and oligarchy, the Rule of Law can prevail.

“There is a crack, a crack in everything. That’s how the light gets in.” In the current moment, it is tempting to reach for hope as comfort, or to repeat familiar lines about resilience, unity, or the promise of American ideals—such as this one from Leonard Cohen. But as educator Jeffrey Duncan-Andrade warns, not all hope is created equal. The kind of hope that ignores suffering, that insists the Rule of Law will revive itself without action, is not hope at all. It is what he calls “hokey or “mythical hope,” a passive optimism that ultimately deepens despair. What this moment demands instead is “critical hope”: a form of hope grounded in struggle and action.

Keep ReadingShow less
stethoscope and us dollar bills on blue-colored background.

Millions of Americans face rising healthcare costs and coverage gaps. Learn how strengthening the Affordable Care Act can improve affordability and access.

Getty Images, aaaaimages

When Health Care Becomes a Choice, Something Is Broken

Recently, a nurse told me she had to choose between paying for her husband’s surgery and putting a new roof on their home. “We’re praying for no rain,” she said. In that moment, the distance between political promises and real life collapsed. This is what the economy feels like for millions of Americans — not a graph, not a headline, but a quiet calculation of which basic need they can afford to meet. No family in a nation as wealthy as ours should have to rely on the weather to survive.

For years, Americans were promised that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would be replaced with something better, cheaper, and available to everyone. That promise never became policy. Congress never passed a comprehensive replacement. The closest attempt, the American Health Care Act (AHCA), collapsed under the weight of its own numbers. The Congressional Budget Office found that it would have left 23 million more Americans uninsured, caused 14 million to lose coverage in the first year alone, cut Medicaid by $834 billion, and raised premiums for older adults to levels many could never pay. A 64‑year‑old making $26,500 a year would have seen premiums jump from $1,700 under the ACA to more than $14,000. Protections for people with pre‑existing conditions would have weakened. That is not “better.” That is not “cheaper.” And it certainly was not “for everyone.”

Keep ReadingShow less