• Home
  • Independent Voter News
  • Quizzes
  • Election Dissection
  • Sections
  • Events
  • Directory
  • About Us
  • Glossary
  • Opinion
  • Campaign Finance
  • Redistricting
  • Civic Ed
  • Voting
  • Fact Check
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Subscriptions
  • Log in
Leveraging Our Differences
  • news & opinion
    • Big Picture
      • Civic Ed
      • Ethics
      • Leadership
      • Leveraging big ideas
      • Media
    • Business & Democracy
      • Corporate Responsibility
      • Impact Investment
      • Innovation & Incubation
      • Small Businesses
      • Stakeholder Capitalism
    • Elections
      • Campaign Finance
      • Independent Voter News
      • Redistricting
      • Voting
    • Government
      • Balance of Power
      • Budgeting
      • Congress
      • Judicial
      • Local
      • State
      • White House
    • Justice
      • Accountability
      • Anti-corruption
      • Budget equity
    • Columns
      • Beyond Right and Left
      • Civic Soul
      • Congress at a Crossroads
      • Cross-Partisan Visions
      • Democracy Pie
      • Our Freedom
  • Pop Culture
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
  • events
  • About
      • Mission
      • Advisory Board
      • Staff
      • Contact Us
Sign Up
  1. Home>
  2. gerrymandering>

Redistricting biases have been anything but consistent for 50 years

David Meyers
https://twitter.com/davidmeyers?lang=en
July 05, 2022
gerrymandering protest at Supreme Court

Demonstrators protest outside the Supreme Court in October 2017, as the court hears arguments against gerrymandering. The justices would eventually determine that partisan gerrymandering is not an issue for federal courts.

Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

We have come to expect that certain states, in fact certain regions of the country, are permanently controlled by one party. Republicans in the South and Plains. Democrats on the West Coast and in the Northeast. But a review of historic redistricting data shows how control has shifted over the past five decades.

The Campaign Legal Center scored 50 years’ worth of congressional and state legislative district maps for partisan bias in the decennial redistricting process. And the results show some remarkable changes.


For example, the congressional maps for Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin have skewed heavily toward the Republicans since the post-2000 round of redistricting. But a review of maps dating back to 1972 shows that for many years those states’ plans actually favored the Democrats.

Likewise, in 1972, California had a slight lean toward Republicans but in the ensuing decades had been equally balanced until shifting toward the Democratic column in 2012. And the Texas maps favored Democrats for three decades before shifting right in 2012.

The CLC’s scoring found that while partisan gerrymandering continues to be a concern in many states, bias has not grown more severe in the latest cycle. In fact, CLC found that four Republican-dominated states – Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Virginia – shifted more toward balanced maps, with zero states on either side becoming more extreme.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Among the 43 states that have at least two representatives in the U.S. House, more than half (24) demonstrate some level of bias in their 2022 maps.

A number of factors impacted the redistricting process in unprecedented ways this cycle, explained Mark Gaber, senior director of redistricting for CLC.

“On the legal front, there’s two main decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court that had outsized influence on how this redistricting process unfolded,” he said.

The court’s ruling in the 2013 case Shelby County v. Holder tossed out the Voting Rights Act’s “preclearance” provision, which required states with a history of voting rights violations to get federal approval before changing election laws. And in 2019, the court ruled in Rucho v. Common Cause that federal courts have no standing to weigh in on partisan gerrymandering.

Other factors also impacted the process.

“One obvious one is Covid. That delayed the release of the census data and really truncated the process for redistricting, which is not great for public participation and transparency,” Gaber said “But on a more political level, there were more states that had split control of government, so there were fewer opportunities … for one-party control to dictate the outcome. And the other is the development and existence of independent redistricting commissions and other forms of bipartisan commission.”

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 10 states use redistricting commissions to draw congressional lines, but even those are not without bias. The new maps in Arizona, California, Michigan, New Jersey and Washington all slightly favor Democrats. The 2022 redistricting process in Colorado and Virginia favored the GOP. (No data was available for the new maps in Hawaii, Idaho and Montana.)

“There were more states with split control or Democratic control, I think, than in 2010 but nevertheless Republicans continued to control the process in more states,” said Chris Warshaw, an associate professor of political science at George Washington University.

The redistricting maps favor Republicans in 16 states, according to CLC’s data, whereas 11 states’ maps are skewed to the left. But those numbers have swung dramatically over the past 50 years.

In 1992, each party benefited from 10 maps. But in 1972, 13 maps were biased for Democrats, compared to just seven for Republicans.

The Campaign Legal Center’s PlanScore system grades maps on four criteria:

  • Efficiency gap, or cracking and packing a party’s supporters to undervalue certain people’s votes.
  • Partisan bias, which measures the difference between a party’s seat share and hypothetical tied election.
  • The difference between a party’s median vote share and its mean vote share.
  • Declination, which identifies partisan gerrymandering based on designed win/loss outcomes.

Read more about the data and the methodology.

From Your Site Articles
  • Rewarding the redistricting cheaters - The Fulcrum ›
  • West Virginia deserves high marks for redistricting - The Fulcrum ›
  • Gerrymandering reform, if passed, is still a decade away - The Fulcrum ›
  • Gerrymandering is deeply unpopular among Americans - The Fulcrum ›
  • Fla. lawmakers allow DeSantis to take lead on redistricting - The ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
  • Analysis | Redistricting map tracker: A detailed look at the 2022 U.S. ... ›
  • Redistricting 2022 Tracker: New Congressional Maps by State ›
  • What Redistricting Looks Like In Every State | FiveThirtyEight ›
gerrymandering

Join an Upcoming Event

STAR Voting Massachusetts Monthly Meeting

Equal Vote
Aug 08, 2022 at 7:00 pm
Read More

Up to Us Fall Campus Competition – Apps open 8/9-9/16

Up to Us
Aug 09, 2022 at 8:00 am CDT
Read More

Phonebanking with Better Ballot SC

Aug 09, 2022 at 6:00 pm EDT
Read More

Election Observing Citizen Engagement Forum

The People
Aug 10, 2022 at 8:00 pm EDT
Read More

Canvassing at Soda City Market w/ Better Ballot SC

Aug 13, 2022 at 10:00 am EDT
Read More

Improve Texas Elections – August 16ember 7

Ranked Choice Voting for Texas
Aug 16, 2022 at 7:00 pm CDT
Read More
View All Events

Want to write
for The Fulcrum?

If you have something to say about ways to protect or repair our American democracy, we want to hear from you.

Submit
Get some Leverage Sign up for The Fulcrum Newsletter
Follow
Contributors

College campuses can be the staging ground for a democratic revitalization

Clarissa Unger

The Fahey Q&A with Kaitlin LaCasse, protecting Maine elections from big money and foreign interests

Katie Fahey

America needs a Declaration of Independents

Lawrence Goldstone

Activism needs transparency, too

Alina Clough

Courage is the measure

Debilyn Molineaux

Organizing for collective impact: Transforming American democracy together

Caleb Christen
latest News

Podcast: Companies: Crisis and common ground

Our Staff
9h

Nominations for key election leadership positions up for grabs Tuesday in four northern states

Kristin Shiuey
Reya Kumar
Richard Perrins
08 August

The state of voting: Aug. 8, 2022

Our Staff
08 August

Podcast: Framing is vital for survival

Our Staff
08 August

Vermont is poised to make history by being the last state to make history

Barbara Rodriguez, The 19th
05 August

Podcast: A conversation with social entrepreneur Sam Daley-Harris

Our Staff
05 August
Videos

Video: BREAKING: Democrats Move Ahead With Climate, Tax, Health Care Bill As Sinema Signs On

Our Staff

Video: The All-America City Award experience

Our Staff

Video: There's a new political party forming. See who's behind it

Our Staff

Video: The US economy

Our Staff

Video: History of Independence Day: USA's First Fourth of July

Our Staff

Video: Memorial Day 2022

Our Staff
Podcasts

Podcast: Companies: Crisis and common ground

Our Staff
9h

Podcast: Framing is vital for survival

Our Staff
08 August

Podcast: A conversation with social entrepreneur Sam Daley-Harris

Our Staff
05 August

Podcast: Making government work

Our Staff
04 August
Recommended
Podcast: Companies: Crisis and common ground

Podcast: Companies: Crisis and common ground

Podcasts
College student voting

College campuses can be the staging ground for a democratic revitalization

Voting
Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon

Nominations for key election leadership positions up for grabs Tuesday in four northern states

Voting
State of voting - election law changes

The state of voting: Aug. 8, 2022

Voting
Podcast: Framing is vital for survival

Podcast: Framing is vital for survival

Podcasts
​Kaitlin LaCasse collects petition signatures in Raymond, Maine.

The Fahey Q&A with Kaitlin LaCasse, protecting Maine elections from big money and foreign interests

Campaign Finance