Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Ask Joe: Does conflict in the workplace lead to better results?

Ask Joe: Does conflict in the workplace lead to better results?

Weston is executive director of the Fierce Civility Project and the author of "Mastering Respectful Confrontation."

Hey Joe,

My work colleague thinks conflict is good and leads to better results. Some of my other colleagues seem to be okay with his abrasive, combative behavior. He likes to make fun of me and calls me "sensitive" if I call him on it. It's exhausting. How can I deal with him?

Bullied and Exhausted


Hi, Exhausted

I can imagine you are having a tough time if you are feeling both bullied and exhausted. My first suggestion is to see what steps you can take to cultivate "resilience." In the Fierce Civility practice, we define resilience as the capacity to address challenges with ease, skill and confidence. Resilience is not enduring struggles. When you have cultivated what we call "resilient power," you feel physically vital, emotionally stable and mentally clear. Are you pushing yourself — a kind of self-bullying — to work in a way that isn't serving you, causing you to burn out? What self-care practices can you build into your day to reduce exhaustion and increase your energy and effectiveness?

Now let's address the issue with your colleague. Start with asking some clarifying questions. In the conflict resolution world, you will often hear about "good" conflict and "bad" conflict. Bad conflict causes harm. Good conflict can use the tension of differences to initiate more creativity and focus. At the Fierce Civility Project we try to minimize the need to use words like "good" and "bad," which, as judgments, can create separation. The important question is, "To what degree is the conflict bringing harm, benefits or some combination of both?"

So, on some level, if he is suggesting that using "good" conflict can inspire, focus and make the team more effective, and if it works for everyone involved, I can see his viewpoint. So, I would suggest asking him, in a truly curious, respectful way, "What do you mean by conflict?" And, "What do you think it should look like?" If it includes respect and a commitment to not harming, then I would say try it out. You may develop more resilience in the process.

However, stating that conflict is a way to get better results could be a way to excuse harmful behavior, or avoid being held accountable for bullying. This is different. If he has no concern about harming others, then I would start with clarifying and stating your boundaries. Where do you draw the line with how you are treated? When does the process of dealing with challenges and deadlines go from feeling uncomfortable (which can be healthy) to feeling unsafe?

You can't change people, but, with respect and patience, you can influence behavior. Find a time and place when you can talk to him, where you both feel safe and not attacked. Make him aware of his specific behavior without judgment, how it is affecting you, and what you would need to function in a work environment that is productive and not exhausting. Can you clarify why this way of working feels exhausting for you? Hopefully this will make him consider his approach.

Perhaps add the message, "I can see how you might think that this is a good strategy for getting the best out of people. And I can see how it works with some. I would like to continue to do my best work. However, with my kind of personality and value system, using conflict is not the best strategy to get me to excel. Can we discuss other options?"

I am not guaranteeing that this will get him to suddenly behave differently, but it is certainly a start in terms of helping you clarify what your boundaries are and how to advocate for yourself. Feel free to get back in touch if you have any more questions (or check out my book, "Mastering Respectful Confrontation," to find out more ways to effectively confront someone, as well as ways to cultivate more resilient power).

With clarifying power,

Joe

"Ask Joe" is dedicated to exploring the best ways to transform tensions and bridge divides. Our resident advice columnist and conflict resolution specialist, Joe Weston, is here to answer your questions in order to resolve tension, polarization, or conflict.

Learn more about Joe Weston and his work here. Make sure to c heck out Joe’s bestselling book Fierce Civility: Transforming our Global Culture from Polarization to Lasting Peace, published March 2023.

To Ask Joe, please submit questions to:
AskJoe@Fulcrum.us.

Read More

Dolly Parton performs on stage, holding a white, bedazzled guitar.

Dolly Parton performs on The Pyramid Stage on Day 3 of the Glastonbury Festival at Worthy Farm on June 29, 2014.

Shirlaine Forrest/Getty Images

Dolly Parton and the America We Keep Forgetting We Can Be

At a time when many Americans are retreating into rigid identities, Dolly Parton has been one of the few public figures able to speak to every corner of America. She had appeal across the board, no matter whether people were from the rural areas, the cities, the evangelical groups, or the gay community. She was not simply loved; she was trusted too. And in these deeply polarized times we are living in, trust is in desperately short supply.

For sixty years, Dolly Parton has stood as an example of the kind of pluralism based on dignity that our politics has lost and that many people have sadly rejected. She never preached her beliefs and seldom, if at all, talked about politics. Instead, she showed through her life how one can respect one's roots without using them as weapons. Dolly welcomed diversity without fear, and built bridges without ever giving a speech on bridge-building. Because she lived out the beliefs she sang about, she became one of America's most effective advocates for dignity.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bruce Springsteen In Concert, facing his audience.

Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band in concert at Nationals Park on May 27, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Paul Morigi / Getty Images

Springsteen’s October D.C. Festival Pushes Music Into Democracy Fight

Bruce Springsteen has always spoken his mind through politics and expressed it through his music. For decades, he has treated the stage as a platform for the causes he believes in — a place where songs become arguments, and performance becomes a form of public conscience. His work has long insisted that American culture and American democracy are intertwined, that the stories we tell ourselves shape the country we become. So when he steps onstage in October for the “Power to the People Festival” in Washington, D.C., it is likely that this will just be the next chapter in his lifelong effort to defend democratic values through art.

Bruce Springsteen has spent the past year making no secret of his views on the current administration, expressing them with increasing bluntness from the stage. His recent performances have shown that when he believes democracy is at risk, he does not whisper — he raises his voice. Given that history, no one should expect him to be quiet in October. So when he stepped onstage in Washington, D.C., and previewed the upcoming “Power to the People Festival,” it felt less like a surprise and more like the next verse in a long American tradition of artists using their platforms to defend democratic values.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Hollow Song for a Hollow Patriotism: Reclaiming the Real Patriotic Ballads
Imagine a democracy concert followed by a yearlong democracy call to action roadshow—designed to build a new civic movement
Getty Images, gilaxia

A Hollow Song for a Hollow Patriotism: Reclaiming the Real Patriotic Ballads

After musician after musician pulled out from Trump’s June 24 “Freedom 250” concert, we’re left with Lee Greenwood and an opera tenor. The anthem that made Greenwood a star, “God Bless the USA,” was written in 1985 during the height of the Cold War. It begins with the specter of loss—“If tomorrow—all the things were gone, I’d worked for all my life / And I had to start all over with my children and my wife.” Then the wounds disappear before they’re felt: “I’d thank my lucky stars to be living here today / Because the flag still stands for freedom and they can’t take that away.”

Ronald Reagan made the song his campaign theme while launching a new age of American inequality by systematically busting unions and cutting taxes for the wealthiest. Greenwood treats layoffs and the resulting toll on ordinary lives as a mere inconvenience. As the refrain shifts from violins and a church organ to a military march, he repeats, “I’m proud to be an American, where at least I know I’m free / And I won’t forget the men who died who gave that right to me.”

Keep ReadingShow less