Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Unity doesn’t mean thinking alike in a free society

Red and blue hands coming together
JakeOlimb/Getty Images

“In the political life of a free society, unity doesn’t mean thinking alike,” according to noted political theorist Yuval Levin. “Unity means acting together.”

A couple weeks ago, Levin sat down with Brian Boyle of American Promise to unpack this idea and others from Levin’s latest book, “American Covenant: How the Constitution Unified Our Nation — And Could Again.”


Levin is the director of social, cultural and constitutional studies at the American Enterprise Institute. The founder and editor of National Affairs, he is also a senior editor at The New Atlantis, a contributing editor at National Review and a contributing opinion writer at The New York Times. Levin served as a member of the White House domestic policy staff under President George W. Bush.

In a wide-ranging conversation, they discussed the importance of constructive conflict in our constitutional system, practical ways to bridge the ideological divide and ongoing efforts to amend our country’s founding document.

The conversation was hosted by American Promise, a cross-partisan organization working to advance the For Our Freedom Amendment, a constitutional measure that would legally empower lawmakers to pass reasonable restrictions around campaign finance.

In the wake of a record-breaking $20 billion election, Levin also offered his take on how big money nationalizes local elections and collapses discourse, why well-intentioned campaign finance regulations have failed in the past and how judicial overreach disempowers Congress from tackling difficult problems.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Levin identified several structural factors that drive polarization, including the modern primary system. “We begin every election cycle by basically asking the people who least want the system to work, ‘Who do you want in the political system?’” Levin explains. “The answer is: People who don’t want to compromise, people who don’t want to bargain, people who want to be ideological purists — and who view the other party as the country’s biggest problem.”

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

Read More

Older woman speaking with another woman

Listen for values and emotions, not just points you can rebut with facts.

kupicoo/Getty Images

Vaccines and values: When you’re having a tough conversation about medicine, don’t just pile on evidence − listen to someone’s ‘moral foundations’

It’s that special time of year when family and friends come together to celebrate the holidays, share meals, spread cheer – and, too often, pass along their germs.

Because vaccines can save lives and prevent serious illness, health professionals have long recommended vaccinations for influenza, COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV. Yet despite these apparent benefits, many people decline.

Keep ReadingShow less
civic education notebook

We need to increase emphasis on schools as a more effective location for teaching interpersonal civil discourse.

Zhanna Hapanovich/Getty Images

4 S’s showcase how dialogue fits and where other approaches work best

In my previous article, I explained the “4 R’s” that should cause people to reconsider the extremely strong emphasis on civil discourse in efforts to reduce political divides in the United States. I also promised suggestions for how to use dialogue most effectively, in specific circumstances, and when non-dialogue approaches may be best.

A brief overview of the 4 R’s to reconsider such a heavy focus on dialogue reminds us that it is difficult to get many people to attend events (recruitment), civil discourse is not inherently effective (reliability), even a successful 1:1 interaction may not generalize to the entire out-party (representativeness) and getting people to repeatedly use skills learned is challenging (repetition).

Keep ReadingShow less
Caucasian business people talking on bench outdoors

Civil discourse can be effective, but its effectiveness is limited.

Jetta Productions Inc./Getty Images

The 4 R’s reduce dialogue workshop effectiveness – but don’t despair

In some circles, reducing political divides and civil discourse are almost synonymous. I’ve had conversations where I mention that I work on reducing these divides, only to have the other person launch into some story or opinion about civil discourse.

By “civil discourse,” I mean an interpersonal focus on communication, which can include activities like dialogue or certain types of debates.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young Hispanic woman holding a U.S. flag and looking stressed
AaronAmat/Getty Images

Distraught at Trump’s win? Here are some ways to lower your anxiety.

Donald Trump’s election sparked a lot of emotions. Many are feeling excited, optimistic and vindicated. Others are struggling with fear, anxiety and anger.

These varied reactions are also found among those in the movement to reduce political toxicity. Some members of the Builders community sent us messages about their distress at Trump’s win:

Keep ReadingShow less