Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A spark of illumination

A spark of illumination
Getty Images

Gates and Gerzon are co-founders of Philanthropy Bridging Divides, a trans-partisan conversation with philanthropic leaders about how they can bridge ideological divides in America.

These are dark times for our democracy. We have separated into camps that are convinced that the other side is not just wrong, but evil. But even in the darkness, sometimes bright sparks of illumination appear.


We were encouraged to see two governors, one a Republican and one a Democrat, recently make a joint appearance on CNN discussing their ‘Disagree Better’ initiative. Spencer Cox is the Republican Governor of Utah and chair of the National Governors Association. Jared Polis is the Democratic Governor of Colorado and NGA’s vice chair. True, neither of them are household names. Neither commands attention from the national press. But what they have done is a spark of light that should not go unnoticed.

The initiative came about after the recent NGA meeting where most republican governors declined to attend, breaking long-time tradition. “If we’re ever going to find our better angels again, it has to start with us setting the example of how to disagree better,” Cox said. “A bipartisan organization in a partisan world is always going to struggle, there’s no question about that.” You can read more here.

Polis, perhaps awkwardly, raised the issue of abortion. He made the point that Democrats don’t think that abortion is ‘good’ and they’d like to find a way to minimize it. And yet, this is language that comes directly from former President Bill Clinton, who famously said that he believed abortion should be legal, safe and rare. And yet, Polis was attacked by some in his own party for being willing to have a conversation that did not fit into the neat political calculation of our time-Democrats are in favor of abortion and Republicans are opposed to it.

Bridging divides is hard work, and it invariably opens up those trying to do so to attacks from their ‘side’. In an extremely polarized time, the very thought of trying to find middle ground, or even to understand another perspective, is extremely politically perilous.

As two advocates for breaking out of our partisan straight-jackets we applaud this effort and think that Cox and Polis can do even more.

Just as these two have paired up and will continue to speak out together, why not challenge other governors to pair up as well and replicate the dialogue that Cox and Polis have modeled? There are 26 Republican Governors and 24 Democratic Governors, so there is a huge opportunity to model a new approach to disagreement and finding shared ground. Some pairings that could be illuminating are Wes Moore (D-MD) and Sara Huckabee (R-AR), JB Pritzker (D-IL) and Eric Holcomb (R-IN), and Janet Mills (D-ME) and Mike DeWine (R-OH).

Not every governor will be a hyper-partisan warrior over the next 14 months, so we can certainly rule out Gavin Newsom and Ron DeSantis. But most governors are very much focused on how they can make their states better, which includes working with diverse coalitions. During what will undoubtedly be a rancorous and unpleasant election year, these cross-partisan conversations would remind voters that we are not as divided as we might be led to think.

Another idea is that the NGA could promote a ‘Better Arguments’ initiative. They could challenge states to develop community-wide and state-wide processes where people could come together in safe, civic space to talk about how they felt about the issues of the day, but do so in a way that promoted connection and empathy, not alienation and anger. [Funding should be easy to obtain from the philanthropic community.]

It is a perilous time to step on to the thin ice of understanding and sympathizing, so we should applaud the conversation that Cox and Polis have initiated and find ways to support it and expand it. They are going against the political grain at just the right time and embodying true patriotism


Read More

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

US Capitol and South America. Nicolas Maduro’s capture is not the end of an era. It marks the opening act of a turbulent transition

AI generated

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

The U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro will be remembered as one of the most dramatic American interventions in Latin America in a generation. But the real story isn’t the raid itself. It’s what the raid reveals about the political imagination of the hemisphere—how quickly governments abandon the language of sovereignty when it becomes inconvenient, and how easily Washington slips back into the posture of regional enforcer.

The operation was months in the making, driven by a mix of narcotrafficking allegations, geopolitical anxiety, and the belief that Maduro’s security perimeter had finally cracked. The Justice Department’s $50 million bounty—an extraordinary price tag for a sitting head of state—signaled that the U.S. no longer viewed Maduro as a political problem to be negotiated with, but as a criminal target to be hunted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red elephants and blue donkeys

The ACA subsidy deadline reveals how Republican paralysis and loyalty-driven leadership are hollowing out Congress’s ability to govern.

Carol Yepes

Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis

Picture a bridge with a clearly posted warning: without a routine maintenance fix, it will close. Engineers agree on the repair, but the construction crew in charge refuses to act. The problem is not that the fix is controversial or complex, but that making the repair might be seen as endorsing the bridge itself.

So, traffic keeps moving, the deadline approaches, and those responsible promise to revisit the issue “next year,” even as the risk of failure grows. The danger is that the bridge fails anyway, leaving everyone who depends on it to bear the cost of inaction.

Keep ReadingShow less
White House
A third party candidate has never won the White House, but there are two ways to examine the current political situation, writes Anderson.
DEA/M. BORCHI/Getty Images

250 Years of Presidential Scandals: From Harding’s Oil Bribes to Trump’s Criminal Conviction

During the 250 years of America’s existence, whenever a scandal involving the U.S. President occurred, the public was shocked and dismayed. When presidential scandals erupt, faith and trust in America – by its citizens as well as allies throughout the world – is lost and takes decades to redeem.

Below are several of the more prominent presidential scandals, followed by a suggestion as to how "We the People" can make America truly America again like our founding fathers so eloquently established in the constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money and the American flag
Half of Americans want participatory budgeting at the local level. What's standing in the way?
SimpleImages/Getty Images

For the People, By the People — Or By the Wealthy?

When did America replace “for the people, by the people” with “for the wealthy, by the wealthy”? Wealthy donors are increasingly shaping our policies, institutions, and even the balance of power, while the American people are left as spectators, watching democracy erode before their eyes. The question is not why billionaires need wealth — they already have it. The question is why they insist on owning and controlling government — and the people.

Back in 1968, my Government teacher never spoke of powerful think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, now funded by billionaires determined to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. Yet here in 2025, these forces openly work to control the Presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court through Project 2025. The corruption is visible everywhere. Quid pro quo and pay for play are not abstractions — they are evident in the gifts showered on Supreme Court justices.

Keep ReadingShow less