Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

A spark of illumination

A spark of illumination
Getty Images

Gates and Gerzon are co-founders of Philanthropy Bridging Divides, a trans-partisan conversation with philanthropic leaders about how they can bridge ideological divides in America.

These are dark times for our democracy. We have separated into camps that are convinced that the other side is not just wrong, but evil. But even in the darkness, sometimes bright sparks of illumination appear.


We were encouraged to see two governors, one a Republican and one a Democrat, recently make a joint appearance on CNN discussing their ‘Disagree Better’ initiative. Spencer Cox is the Republican Governor of Utah and chair of the National Governors Association. Jared Polis is the Democratic Governor of Colorado and NGA’s vice chair. True, neither of them are household names. Neither commands attention from the national press. But what they have done is a spark of light that should not go unnoticed.

The initiative came about after the recent NGA meeting where most republican governors declined to attend, breaking long-time tradition. “If we’re ever going to find our better angels again, it has to start with us setting the example of how to disagree better,” Cox said. “A bipartisan organization in a partisan world is always going to struggle, there’s no question about that.” You can read more here.

Polis, perhaps awkwardly, raised the issue of abortion. He made the point that Democrats don’t think that abortion is ‘good’ and they’d like to find a way to minimize it. And yet, this is language that comes directly from former President Bill Clinton, who famously said that he believed abortion should be legal, safe and rare. And yet, Polis was attacked by some in his own party for being willing to have a conversation that did not fit into the neat political calculation of our time-Democrats are in favor of abortion and Republicans are opposed to it.

Bridging divides is hard work, and it invariably opens up those trying to do so to attacks from their ‘side’. In an extremely polarized time, the very thought of trying to find middle ground, or even to understand another perspective, is extremely politically perilous.

As two advocates for breaking out of our partisan straight-jackets we applaud this effort and think that Cox and Polis can do even more.

Just as these two have paired up and will continue to speak out together, why not challenge other governors to pair up as well and replicate the dialogue that Cox and Polis have modeled? There are 26 Republican Governors and 24 Democratic Governors, so there is a huge opportunity to model a new approach to disagreement and finding shared ground. Some pairings that could be illuminating are Wes Moore (D-MD) and Sara Huckabee (R-AR), JB Pritzker (D-IL) and Eric Holcomb (R-IN), and Janet Mills (D-ME) and Mike DeWine (R-OH).

Not every governor will be a hyper-partisan warrior over the next 14 months, so we can certainly rule out Gavin Newsom and Ron DeSantis. But most governors are very much focused on how they can make their states better, which includes working with diverse coalitions. During what will undoubtedly be a rancorous and unpleasant election year, these cross-partisan conversations would remind voters that we are not as divided as we might be led to think.

Another idea is that the NGA could promote a ‘Better Arguments’ initiative. They could challenge states to develop community-wide and state-wide processes where people could come together in safe, civic space to talk about how they felt about the issues of the day, but do so in a way that promoted connection and empathy, not alienation and anger. [Funding should be easy to obtain from the philanthropic community.]

It is a perilous time to step on to the thin ice of understanding and sympathizing, so we should applaud the conversation that Cox and Polis have initiated and find ways to support it and expand it. They are going against the political grain at just the right time and embodying true patriotism

Read More

Mad About Politics? Blame Congress

House Speaker Mike Johnson and Republican leaders celebrate after the vote on President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 3, 2025.

Yuri Gripas/Abaca Press/TNS

Mad About Politics? Blame Congress

The judiciary isn’t supposed to be the primary check on the executive, the legislative branch is.

Whatever you think about American politics and government, whether you are on the right, the left or somewhere in the middle, you should be mad at Congress. I don’t just mean the Republican-controlled Congress — though, by all means, be mad at them — I mean the institution as a whole.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jennifer Greenfield Speaks Out for Colorado Families

Jennifer Greenfield Speaks Out for Colorado Families

When Jennifer Greenfield wrote an op-ed in The Denver Post warning that proposed federal budget cuts would devastate Coloradans who rely on programs like Medicaid and SNAP, she hoped her words might help change the conversation—and the outcome. Her piece drew a wave of responses, including appreciation from state leaders and an invitation to speak at a local event. Although the GOP’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” ultimately became law, Greenfield continues to warn about its long-term consequences. She spoke with SSN about the ripple effects of her op-ed and shared advice for fellow scholars who want their research to make a difference. The following conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

Q&A with Jennifer Greenfield

You recently wrote an op-ed about the GOP’s budget bill. What message were you hoping to get across?

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Capitol

James Madison foresaw factions tearing apart democracy. Today’s Congress, driven by partisanship and money, proves his warning true.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Our Amazing, Shrinking Congress

James Madison tried to warn us. He foresaw a grave danger to our fragile republic. No, it wasn’t an overreaching, dictatorial President. It was the people’s representatives themselves who might shred the untested constitutional fabric of the nascent United States.

Members of Congress could destroy it by neglecting the good of the country in favor of narrow, self-serving ends. Unity would collapse into endless internecine strife. Madison sounded this alarm in Federalist No. 10: he foresaw the inevitable emergence of “factions”—political parties “united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Trump and the MAGA movement have twisted the meaning of patriotism. It’s time we collectively reclaim America’s founding ideals and the Pledge’s promise.

Getty Images, LeoPatrizi

Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Republicans have always claimed to be the patriotic party, the party of "America, right or wrong," the party willing to use force to protect American national interests abroad, the party of a strong military. In response, Democrats have not really contested this perspective since Vietnam, basically ceding the patriotic badge to the Republicans.

But with the advent of Donald Trump, the Republican claim to patriotism has gotten broader and more troubling. Republicans now claim to be the party that is true to our founding principles. And it is not just the politicians; they have support from far-right scholars at the Heritage Foundation, such as Matthew Spalding. The Democratic Party has done nothing to counter these claims.

Keep ReadingShow less