Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Medicaid expansion in Alabama: A voter’s guide

Medicaid expansion

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn and other congressional Democrats hold a press conference about Medicaid expansion in September 2021.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

This story was originally published in Reckon.

In April of 2022, Reckon and partners including Essential Partners, Cortico, and Bridge Alliance, hosted conversations with Alabamians under 40 about the future of their state for a project called Bridge Alabama. This guide focuses on an issue raised in those conversations.


What’s Medicaid?

It’s the public health insurance program for low-income Americans. It’s designed to help people afford things like doctor’s appointments, lab work and surgeries. Each state runs its own Medicaid program, funded with federal and state money.

Eligibility – who qualifies for Medicaid – varies from state to state

Back in 2010, the Affordable Care Act expanded which people are eligible for Medicaid, extending it to adults up to age 64 with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level, which in 2022 is about $27,750 per year for a family of four.

But many Republican-led states, including Alabama, pushed back against the ACA’s Medicaid expansion requirement, arguing the federal government was overreaching. The Supreme Court struck down the requirement in 2012, ruling that Medicaid expansion had to be optional for states.

To date, 38 states and the District of Columbia have adopted Medicaid expansion. In those states, the federal government covers 90% of the costs of the program.

Just 12 states, including Alabama, have not expanded Medicaid. Most of them are in the South. Because they didn’t expand Medicaid, it’s harder for low-income people to qualify to receive Medicaid in these states.

Alabama Medicaid is a bare-bones program. Coverage is only available to children, people with special health care needs and some caregivers.

For example, an Alabama parent with one child can’t earn more than $3,135 a year and still qualify for Medicaid. If that same parent and child lived in Virginia, which expanded Medicaid in 2019, the parent could earn up to $24,000 a year and keep their coverage.

Now the federal government is trying again to entice holdout states. Last year’s federal coronavirus relief package included financial incentives for non-expansion states to expand Medicaid. Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey has said she’s “open to discussion” but continues to question whether the state can afford it.

Why is it controversial?

In the first years after the ACA (often nicknamed “Obamacare”) passed, Alabama’s conservative leaders balked at the potential cost and questioned the constitutionality of the federal legislation dictating how a state ran its healthcare programs.

In recent years, though, Medicaid expansion has lost much of its stigma. A recent poll from expansion advocates showed two-thirds of respondents supported expansion. More than 100 Alabama organizations, including the state hospital association and medical association, have grown more vocal in their support of Medicaid expansion, saying it could insure an additional 284,000 Alabamians, create more jobs, reduce reliance on emergency rooms for basic healthcare, and improve the state’s poor health outcomes.

Even Republican former Gov. Robert Bentley, who refused to expand Medicaid while he was in office, recently called on Gov. Kay Ivey to move forward with expansion.

Although few Alabama leaders outright oppose expansion now, the ones who express skepticism continue to question how Alabama would pay for it.

A study released this year projected that Medicaid expansion would cost Alabama an additional $225.4 million over the next six years, but could save the state an estimated $398 million.

Who is working on the issue?

Cover Alabama is the state’s largest Medicaid expansion advocacy organization. It’s a nonpartisan coalition of more than 100 organizations across the state, including medical associations, faith groups, businesses and consumer advocacy groups.

Regionally, Southerners for Medicaid Expansion is a multi-state coalition of expansion advocacy groups in Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina and North Carolina.

Solutions from other states
States that have expanded Medicaid have improved access to care for low-income adults, seen fewer premature deaths among older adults, reduced medical debt, and seen a drop in hospital uncompensated care costs, according to the Center of Budget and Policy Priorities.

Several non-expansion states in the South, including Georgia, Florida and Tennessee, have chosen to partially expand Medicaid by extending Medicaid to birthing people for longer than the six weeks postpartum required by federal law.

In April 2022, after lobbying by advocates, Alabama extended pregnancy Medicaid from six weeks to one year postpartum. This has the potential for significant impact; because eligibility requirements are broader for pregnant people, Medicaid covers about half of all births in Alabama.

The state extended pregnancy Medicaid in two parts: Alabama Medicaid set aside about $4 million in its budget to extend pregnancy Medicaid to six months postpartum; then the Alabama legislature approved a state general fund budget with another $4 million earmarked to bump the coverage to a full year. Legislators have called it a “pilot program.”

How can I get involved?

There are different pathways that states like Alabama can take to expand Medicaid, involving the governor, state legislators and the Alabama Medicaid agency itself. Anyone interested in Medicaid expansion can write or call their state senator and state representative ( find yours here by clicking on the map and entering your address) or the governor’s office.

For those interested in advocacy and information, Cover Alabama offers updates via free email subscription, an online petition to sign, and invites organizations to apply to become Cover Alabama members.

Social media hashtags on Medicaid expansion include #ExpandMedicaid, #CoverAlabama, #south4medex and #ALpolitics.

Resources


Read More

Someone using an AI chatbot on their phone.

AI-powered wellness tools promise care at work, but raise serious questions about consent, surveillance, and employee autonomy.

Getty Images, d3sign

Why Workplace Wellbeing AI Needs a New Ethics of Consent

Across the U.S. and globally, employers—including corporations, healthcare systems, universities, and nonprofits—are increasing investment in worker well-being. The global corporate wellness market reached $53.5 billion in sales in 2024, with North America leading adoption. Corporate wellness programs now use AI to monitor stress, track burnout risk, or recommend personalized interventions.

Vendors offering AI-enabled well-being platforms, chatbots, and stress-tracking tools are rapidly expanding. Chatbots such as Woebot and Wysa are increasingly integrated into workplace wellness programs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women holding signs to defend diversity at Havard

Harvard students joined in a rally protesting the Supreme Courts ruling against affirmative action in 2023.

Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Diversity Has Become a Dirty Word. It Doesn’t Have to Be.

I have an identical twin sister. Although our faces can unlock each other’s iPhones, even the two of us are not exactly the same. If identical twins can differ, wouldn’t most people be different too? Why is diversity considered a bad word?

Like me, my twin sister is in computing, yet we are unique in many ways. She works in industry, while I am in academia. She’s allergic to guinea pigs, while I had pet guinea pigs (yep, that’s how she found out). Even our voices aren’t the same. As a kid, I was definitely the chattier one, while she loved taking walks together in silence (which, of course, drove me crazy).

Keep ReadingShow less
The Domestic Sting: Why the Tariff Bill is Arriving at the American Door
photo of dollar coins and banknotes
Photo by Mathieu Turle on Unsplash

The Domestic Sting: Why the Tariff Bill is Arriving at the American Door

America's tariff experiment, now nearly a year old, is proving more painful than its architects anticipated. What began as a bold stroke to shield domestic industries and force concessions from trading partners has instead delivered a slow-burning rise in prices, complicating the Federal Reserve's battle against inflation. As the policy grinds on, economists warn that the real damage lies ahead, with consumers and businesses absorbing costs that erode purchasing power and economic momentum. This is not the quick victory promised but a protracted burden that risks entrenching higher prices just as the economy seeks stability.

The tariffs, rolled out in phases since early March 2025, have jacked up the average import duty from 2 percent to around 17 percent. Imported goods prices have climbed 4 percent since then, outpacing the 2 percent rise in domestic equivalents. Items like coffee, which the United States cannot produce at scale, have seen the sharpest hikes, alongside products from heavily penalized countries such as China. Retailers and importers, far from passing all costs abroad as hoped, have shouldered much of the load initially, limiting immediate sticker shock. Yet daily pricing data from major chains reveal a creeping pass-through: imported goods up 5 percent overall, domestic up 2.5 percent. Cautious sellers absorb some hit to avoid losing market share, but this restraint is fading as tariffs are embedded in supply chains.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a paper that says "Ranked-Choice" with options listed below.
Image generated by IVN staff.

Why Mathematicians Love Ranked Choice Voting

The Institute for Mathematics and Democracy (IMD) has released what may be the most comprehensive empirical study of ranked choice voting ever conducted. The 66-page report analyzes nearly 4,000 real-world ranked ballot elections, including some 2,000 political elections, and more than 60 million simulated ones to test how different voting methods perform.

The study’s conclusion is clear. Ranked choice voting methods outperform traditional first-past-the-post elections on nearly every measure of democratic fairness.

Keep ReadingShow less