Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Presidential longshot Deval Patrick poised to claim the new ‘sentrist’ mantle

Presidential longshot Deval Patrick poised to claim the new ‘sentrist’ mantle

"Deval Patrick needs a bold theme to harness his power," argues Dave Anderson.

David Becker/Getty Images

Anderson is the editor of "Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework" (Springer, 2014) and ran for the 2016 Democratic nomination in Maryland's 8th Congressional District.

So many of the 2020 Democratic candidates are qualified and would have a good chance of being good presidents, but it is unclear if anyone is up to the task of defeating President Trump. Former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, who jumped into the race in November, has the charisma as well as the executive branch experience, experience in Washington, and arteries connecting him to former President Barack Obama to win the nomination and the general election.

What Patrick does not have is a theme for his campaign. If he did, the money and followers might come his way. For now, he remains a virtual afterthought in the race. But I have a winning suggestion for him.


He is talking about solving problems based on results he achieved in Massachusetts and unifying the country, but everyone talks about solving problems and unifying the country. Unifying the country, as Winston Churchill once remarked of a pudding served to him, is a pudding that "has no theme!"

Patrick is positioned to be the best kind of centrist in the race, a kind of centrist I have previously called a "sentrist." Sentrists leverage the uncertainty of those in the middle in order to create bipartisan solutions to our nation's problems. They move beyond left and right in order to articulate a new center for American society, but they distinguish themselves from moderates because moderates are associated with middle of the road leaders (and voters) who stand in between liberals and conservatives and ask that we split the difference.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Sentrists are bold. They're bursting with passion. While sentrists don't have all of the answers, they do have the right ideas, impulses and intelligence to work with Congress and the American people to get the job done.

If Patrick could convert his unity message into a more focused message about moving beyond left and right and leveraging the uncertainty of those in the middle, then he could hitch his energetic, exuberant voice to the sentrist train.

Behind the podium he can be as electrifying as Obama or the Rev. Jesse Jackson.

There are other energetic, exuberant speakers in this race — notably a fellow New Englander, Sen. Bernie Sanders. But we don't need another Sanders in the race and Patrick has in no way suggested that he is another left wing democratic socialist to offer primary voters. To the contrary, Patrick is speaking the language of unity and finding a way to avoid extremes, but he has not found his voice yet because his team has not found its place on the ideological spectrum.

And they won't — sentrism does not fit on the ideological spectrum. It is a new view for a new time period, and it needs someone to adopt it and run on it for president.

Sentrists support increasing the Social Security payments of the least advantaged seniors and also extending the age eligibility by two years. Sentrists support major child care support for families with young children and offer an option of a tax credit for two-paycheck families who would rather have one parent at home with a young child. Sentrists do not support the Green New Deal but they do call for uniting public and private strategies to combat the planetary crisis before us.

Sentrists do not have a white paper on everything, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren. To the contrary, they appeal to the real uncertainty that up to half of our potential voters have about major policy issues and offer their sentrist, outside-the-box thinking to these voters as a promise to get things done. Sentrists validate the uncertainty of voters; they don't offer simplistic solutions that will never pass Congress.

We are at a critical juncture in the Democratic race for president. Patrick hails from Massachusetts, a state that has produced the Kennedy family as well as a string of moderate Republican governors ranging from Bill Weld and Mitt Romney to the incumbent, Charlie Baker. It's known as a very liberal state, but insiders know that state politics often requires cooperation across the aisle, especially with veto-proof majorities in both chambers. Even though Patrick governed amongst Democrats, the Legislature is used to wrestling with their governors and they made Patrick wrestle with them.

The Democratic party needs a candidate who has a very forceful voice and knows the importance of compromise as well as synthesis. The party needs to break out of the centrist/progressive dichotomy. The party needs a third kind of candidate, a sentrist.

Patrick needs a bold theme to harness his power. Sentrism needs his leadership and his voice.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less