Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Hope for democracy reformers after Democrats win in Virginia and Kentucky

Virginia voters

Virginia voters went to the polls Tuesday and elected Democratic majorities to both legislative chambers, opening the door for the party to pursue a wish list of campaign finance and voting rights reforms.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

While Democrats are emphasizing their big victories in neighboring Southern states as warning signs for President Trump, advocates for fixing democratic systems are hailing those same elections Tuesday as major opportunities for their cause.

The most significant triumph came in Virginia, where Democrats reclaimed control of the General Assembly and, along with Gov. Ralph Northam, won unified control of state government for the first time in a quarter-century. That will open the door in January for a long roster of democracy reform proposals that have been languishing in Richmond — from tightening the state's campaign finance rules to stopping the partisan gerrymandering of its electoral maps.

The election of Democrat Andy Beshear as governor of Kentucky, meanwhile, allows him to make good on a promise to end that state's status as one of the harshest places to be a felon who wants to be a voting member of society after serving time. (That's if his win stands up — the incumbent, Republican Matt Bevin, has not conceded.)


Virginia, the 12th largest state after a long run of growth in the suburbs outside Washington, has been becoming a steadily deeper blue, but the Democratic Party has not controlled all the levers of state power since 1993. That will change in January, and during the campaign many of the winning candidates vowed they will move then to deny themselves legislative and congressional map-making powers in favor of an independent commission.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The question is whether they will keep their promise now that they have the power to entrench themselves and their party. The next statewide elections are in 2021, giving the General Assembly ample time to redraw the lines after the next census, and there will be intense pressure to keep a U.S. House delegation with seven Democrats and four Republicans. Before last year's wave midterm, it was the GOP with a 7-4 edge.

In February, 123 of the state's 140 lawmakers voted in favor of creating a nonpartisan redistricting commission. That proposal will go in front of voters in November 2020, but only if the Legislature endorses it a second time early next year.

Groups pushing to temper the power of money in politics, meanwhile, will be lobbying intensely for a bill establishing campaign contribution limits and banning corporate giving to officeholders.

One prominent organization, End Citizens United, got heavily involved in the campaign for control of the Legislature and endorsed more than 30 candidates; 14 of the 25 House aspirants backed by the group won on Tuesday, along with just one of the six anointed Senate contestants. All were Democrats.

"These candidates won their races by standing up to corporate special interests and business as usual in Richmond," ECU President Tiffany Muller said. "Virginians know that the corrupting influence of unlimited, undisclosed spending in our elections is a roadblock to making health care more affordable, addressing climate change, and passing common-sense gun safety measures."

The restoration of voting rights to thousands of felons in Virginia has already been accomplished in recent years through executive orders signed by Northam and his predecessor, fellow Democrat Terry McAuliffe.

That is the model that Beshear, currently the Kentucky attorney general, says he will follow early next year in his state.

He has signaled that he will assert his new gubernatorial power to restore the franchise to more than 100,000 nonviolent felons who had completed their sentences, or 5 percent of the state's population, ahead of the 2020 presidential election. Kentucky and Iowa are now the only states where all felons are barred from voting for life unless the governor grants a waiver.

Beshear also supports automatic voter registration and easier access to absentee voting. He also said during the campaign he planned to require state officeholders to release their tax returns (as he did during the race), ban contractors from giving gifts to public officials and implement term limits for state legislators. But most of those things will only be accomplished through legislation, and the House and Senate in Frankfort will both remain solidly in the hands of Republicans.

The other governor's race contested Tuesday was in Mississippi, where Republican Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves won with 52 percent of the vote. His support was widespread enough that there will be no need to invoke a Jim Crow-era law, putting the election in the hands of the state House if no candidate carries a majority of the legislative districts.

But civil rights groups will continue to pursue a federal lawsuit alleging the law is an unconstitutional effort to minimize the political power of African Americans.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less