Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Poll: Virginia voters want electoral, redistricting reform

Virginia Capitol in Richmond

With Democrats taking control in Richmond, legislators are expected to pass a number of political reforms in 2020.

XiFotos/Getty Images

Lopsisded majorities of Virginians support automatic voter registration, no-excuse absentee voting and independent redistricting, new polling shows.

The sentiments are shared by Democratic state lawmakers, who are expected to pass legislation making registration easier, voting more convenient and redistricting a nonpartisan process when the General Assembly reconvenes in January with Democratic majorities newly installed in both chambers.

The survey of 901 registered voters conducted in November found overwhelming support for all three proposals. The results were released this week by Christopher Newport University's Wason Center for Public Policy.


Among the findings: 74 percent support legislation that would allow voters to cast an absentee ballot without citing a reason within three weeks of Election Day, and 64 percent support automatic voter registration for all eligible citizens.

The survey also found 70 percent of voters supported amending the state constitution to create an independent redistricting commission, a proposition that would go before voters as a referendum in November 2020 if approved by legislators in Richmond a second time, as state law requires. The proposal won initial approved earlier this year. If the proposal succeeds, the new panel would be created in time for the redistricting of the state in 2021.

The survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less