Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Meet the reformer: Jason Fierman, creating connections and drawing lines

Jason Fierman, The Redistricting Network

"Whether it is school, judicial or legislative boundaries, the lines change your life, and it is one of the reasons I fight for fair maps."

Jason Fierman

While working toward his master's degree at George Mason University, Jason Fierman researched the lack of synergy among advocates against gerrymandering, the centuries-old practice of the people in power drawing tortuous political boundaries in order to keep them in power. That capstone project evolved into The Redistrict Network, a collection of political operatives, mathematicians, students and other experts who are dedicated to remaking the nation's electoral maps so their districts are compact, keep communities together, promote partisan competition and reflect the relative strengths of different ethnic groups. Fierman has been the network's managing director since founding it in 2018. His answers have been lightly edited for length and clarity.

What's the tweet-length description of your organization?

When we share stories, strategies and resources across fields and disciplines we create a momentum that advances redistricting reform across the country. Let's end #gerrymandering together!


Describe your very first civic engagement.

As a 10th grader in Westchester, N.Y., I ran a campaign and was elected treasurer of my high school class government. As treasurer, it was my responsibility to oversee and manage the finances for our big trip to Philadelphia!

What was your biggest professional triumph?

Starting The Redistrict Network. As a topic, redistricting used to be siloed between fields and industries. It was also generally an unknown or obscure topic to the public. Our platform is allowing specialists and professionals to associate, collaborate and advance redistricting reform across the country. We are also proud to be informing, educating and engaging a whole new generation of young leaders on the importance of ending gerrymandering.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

And your most disappointing setback?

A few years ago I was a finalist for a full tuition fee waiver to study politics at Stockholm University. Unfortunately I did not win that competition and it forced me back to the drawing board on going to graduate school. I eventually decided to pursue an MPA in applied politics at George Mason. The curriculum prepared me to be a public leader and it's an education I wouldn't trade for anything!

How does your identity influence the way you go about your work?

My grandparents were Holocaust survivors and escaped Europe after World War II. My grandfather was born in Prussia. My grandmother fled atrocities in Ukraine. They often talked about changing borders to avoid autocratic government. Whether it is school, judicial or legislative boundaries, the lines change your life, and it is one of the reasons I fight for fair maps.

What's the best advice you've ever been given?

A professor once told me "If something can be solved locally, it shouldn't be determined nationally." It's a piece of advice and philosophy that still guides my work today.

Create a new flavor for Ben & Jerry's.

Covfefe Cake

What's your favorite political movie or TV show?

"The Americans." It explored the diametrically opposed ideologies between the Soviets and United States in the 1980s, and it did so in a new and engaging way.

What's the last thing you do on your phone at night?

I'll probably be checking Twitter or reading the Daily Kos Voting Rights Round Up.

What is your deepest, darkest secret?

I am obsessed with backyard lawn games. I own everything from badminton and cornhole to spikeball and kan jam!

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less