Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Meet the reformer: Jason Fierman, creating connections and drawing lines

Jason Fierman, The Redistricting Network

"Whether it is school, judicial or legislative boundaries, the lines change your life, and it is one of the reasons I fight for fair maps."

Jason Fierman

While working toward his master's degree at George Mason University, Jason Fierman researched the lack of synergy among advocates against gerrymandering, the centuries-old practice of the people in power drawing tortuous political boundaries in order to keep them in power. That capstone project evolved into The Redistrict Network, a collection of political operatives, mathematicians, students and other experts who are dedicated to remaking the nation's electoral maps so their districts are compact, keep communities together, promote partisan competition and reflect the relative strengths of different ethnic groups. Fierman has been the network's managing director since founding it in 2018. His answers have been lightly edited for length and clarity.

What's the tweet-length description of your organization?

When we share stories, strategies and resources across fields and disciplines we create a momentum that advances redistricting reform across the country. Let's end #gerrymandering together!


Describe your very first civic engagement.

As a 10th grader in Westchester, N.Y., I ran a campaign and was elected treasurer of my high school class government. As treasurer, it was my responsibility to oversee and manage the finances for our big trip to Philadelphia!

What was your biggest professional triumph?

Starting The Redistrict Network. As a topic, redistricting used to be siloed between fields and industries. It was also generally an unknown or obscure topic to the public. Our platform is allowing specialists and professionals to associate, collaborate and advance redistricting reform across the country. We are also proud to be informing, educating and engaging a whole new generation of young leaders on the importance of ending gerrymandering.

And your most disappointing setback?

A few years ago I was a finalist for a full tuition fee waiver to study politics at Stockholm University. Unfortunately I did not win that competition and it forced me back to the drawing board on going to graduate school. I eventually decided to pursue an MPA in applied politics at George Mason. The curriculum prepared me to be a public leader and it's an education I wouldn't trade for anything!

How does your identity influence the way you go about your work?

My grandparents were Holocaust survivors and escaped Europe after World War II. My grandfather was born in Prussia. My grandmother fled atrocities in Ukraine. They often talked about changing borders to avoid autocratic government. Whether it is school, judicial or legislative boundaries, the lines change your life, and it is one of the reasons I fight for fair maps.

What's the best advice you've ever been given?

A professor once told me "If something can be solved locally, it shouldn't be determined nationally." It's a piece of advice and philosophy that still guides my work today.

Create a new flavor for Ben & Jerry's.

Covfefe Cake

What's your favorite political movie or TV show?

"The Americans." It explored the diametrically opposed ideologies between the Soviets and United States in the 1980s, and it did so in a new and engaging way.

What's the last thing you do on your phone at night?

I'll probably be checking Twitter or reading the Daily Kos Voting Rights Round Up.

What is your deepest, darkest secret?

I am obsessed with backyard lawn games. I own everything from badminton and cornhole to spikeball and kan jam!

Read More

U.S. President Barack Obama speaking on the phone in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Barack Obama talks President Barack Obama talks with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a phone call from the Oval Office on November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, The White House

‘Obama, You're 15 Years Too Late!’

The mid-decade redistricting fight continues, while the word “hypocrisy” has become increasingly common in the media.

The origin of mid-decade redistricting dates back to the early history of the United States. However, its resurgence and legal acceptance primarily stem from the Texas redistricting effort in 2003, a controversial move by the Republican Party to redraw the state's congressional districts, and the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. This decision, which confirmed that mid-decade redistricting is not prohibited by federal law, was a significant turning point in the acceptance of this practice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of a person casting a ballot at a polling station during voting.

Gerrymandering silences communities and distorts elections. Proportional representation offers a proven path to fairer maps and real democracy.

Getty Images, bizoo_n

Gerrymandering Today, Gerrymandering Tomorrow, Gerrymandering Forever

In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace declared, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." (Watch the video of his speech.) As a politically aware high school senior, I was shocked by the venom and anger in his voice—the open, defiant embrace of systematic disenfranchisement, so different from the quieter racism I knew growing up outside Boston.

Today, watching politicians openly rig elections, I feel that same disbelief—especially seeing Republican leaders embrace that same systematic approach: gerrymandering now, gerrymandering tomorrow, gerrymandering forever.

Keep ReadingShow less
An oversized ballot box surrounded by people.

Young people worldwide form new parties to reshape politics—yet America’s two-party system blocks them.

Getty Images, J Studios

No Country for Young Politicians—and How To Fix That

In democracies around the world, young people have started new political parties whenever the establishment has sidelined their views or excluded them from policymaking. These parties have sometimes reinvigorated political competition, compelled established parties to take previously neglected issues seriously, or encouraged incumbent leaders to find better ways to include and reach out to young voters.

In Europe, a trio in their twenties started Volt in 2017 as a pan-European response to Brexit, and the party has managed to win seats in the European Parliament and in some national legislatures. In Germany, young people concerned about climate change created Klimaliste, a party committed to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as per the Paris Agreement. Although the party hasn’t won seats at the federal level, they have managed to win some municipal elections. In Chile, leaders of the 2011 student protests, who then won seats as independent candidates, created political parties like Revolución Democrática and Convergencia Social to institutionalize their movements. In 2022, one of these former student leaders, Gabriel Boric, became the president of Chile at 36 years old.

Keep ReadingShow less
How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

Demonstrators gather outside of The United States Supreme Court during an oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford to call for an end to partisan gerrymandering on October 3, 2017 in Washington, DC

Getty Images, Olivier Douliery

How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground. ~ Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Col. Edward Carrington, Paris, 27 May 1788

The Problem We Face

The U.S. House of Representatives was designed as the chamber of Congress most directly tethered to the people. Article I of the Constitution mandates that seats be apportioned among the states according to population and that members face election every two years—design features meant to keep representatives responsive to shifting public sentiment. Unlike the Senate, which prioritizes state sovereignty and representation, the House translates raw population counts into political voice: each House district is to contain roughly the same number of residents, ensuring that every citizen’s vote carries comparable weight. In principle, then, the House serves as the nation’s demographic mirror, channeling the diverse preferences of the electorate into lawmaking and acting as a safeguard against unresponsive or oligarchic governance.

Nationally, the mismatch between the overall popular vote and the partisan split in House seats is small, with less than a 1% tilt. But state-level results tell a different story. Take Connecticut: Democrats hold all five seats despite Republicans winning over 40% of the statewide vote. In Oklahoma, the inverse occurs—Republicans control every seat even though Democrats consistently earn around 40% of the vote.

Keep ReadingShow less