Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Bloc of Virginia candidates pushing democracy reform as a blue wave generator

Suhas Subramanyam (left) and Rodney Willett

Reform-first candidates Suhas Subramanyam (left) and Rodney Willett are running in safely Democratic Virginia House districts.

Suhas Subramanyam and Rodney Willett

With elections for every seat in Virginia's Legislature less than four weeks away, a coalition of progressive candidates is hoping to sway voters with the promise to push democracy reform.

In a letter being sent Thursday to every member of the General Assembly, 32 Democrats vying in November — about half with a realistic hope of winning — underscored their commitment to advancing an array of campaign finance and voting rights proposals if they get elected.

"We write to you today to put Richmond on notice. We are determined to reform the broken system and spark a restoration of confidence should we be granted the honor of serving our respective districts," they wrote.


Two years ago, Virginia elected Democrat Ralph Northam governor and flipped 15 seats in the Legislature from red to blue, the biggest such partisan shift since 1899 and a herald of the big Democratic gains nationwide in the 2018 midterms. But Republicans still maintained narrow control, with two-seat majorities in both chambers.

If Democrats manage to win control of both chambers in November, the next two years would mark the first period of total Democratic control over Virginia's government in a quarter century. An array of stalled progressive policy ideas would presumably get on the agenda, and at a minimum the Democrats would control the drawing of the state's 11 congressional districts and the legislative boundaries for the next decade.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Eight of the candidates who signed the letter are challenging Republican state senators, with a subset of three running in battleground races in part because Northam carried their districts in his gubernatorial win.

Eighteen are challenging GOP incumbents for the state House, including eight in races where voter patterns give the Democrats a reasonable shot. The other six House candidates are running for open seats, two with a reasonable chance to flip districts from red to blue.

Just two of the letter-signers are lopsided favorites to win by holding deep blue House seats: Rodney Willett of Richmond and Suhas Subramanyam of the Washington exurbs, who won his primary this summer by running on a democracy reform platform pushed by the cross-partisan group Unite America.

The letter-signers pledged that if elected they would push bills to:

  • Establish contribution limits for campaigns in Virginia to dilute the influence of big-money donors.
  • Ban corporations from giving money to elected officials in the Statehouse.
  • Increase transparency around the original sources of political spending in the state.
  • Put before the voters a measure that would turn redistricting of the state over to a nonpartisan commission.
  • End policies seen as making it too difficult to vote.

The candidates say these reform initiatives must pass first "to set the stage" for work on other issues, such as gun control, health care, education, climate change and the economy.

"If Virginians do elect a Democratic majority this November, we must heed their call to create a New Virginia Way that works for everyone — not just for big donors and special interests — and to restore trust in our government. It is time for Virginia to lead the nation toward a new birth of democracy and freedom," the letter reads.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less