Bloc of Virginia candidates pushing democracy reform as a blue wave generator
With elections for every seat in Virginia's Legislature less than four weeks away, a coalition of progressive candidates is hoping to sway voters with the promise to push democracy reform.
In a letter being sent Thursday to every member of the General Assembly, 32 Democrats vying in November — about half with a realistic hope of winning — underscored their commitment to advancing an array of campaign finance and voting rights proposals if they get elected.
"We write to you today to put Richmond on notice. We are determined to reform the broken system and spark a restoration of confidence should we be granted the honor of serving our respective districts," they wrote.
Two years ago, Virginia elected Democrat Ralph Northam governor and flipped 15 seats in the Legislature from red to blue, the biggest such partisan shift since 1899 and a herald of the big Democratic gains nationwide in the 2018 midterms. But Republicans still maintained narrow control, with two-seat majorities in both chambers.
If Democrats manage to win control of both chambers in November, the next two years would mark the first period of total Democratic control over Virginia's government in a quarter century. An array of stalled progressive policy ideas would presumably get on the agenda, and at a minimum the Democrats would control the drawing of the state's 12 congressional districts and the legislative boundaries for the next decade.
Eight of the candidates who signed the letter are challenging Republican state senators, with a subset of three running in battleground races in part because Northam carried their districts in his gubernatorial win.
Eighteen are challenging GOP incumbents for the state House, including eight in races where voter patterns give the Democrats a reasonable shot. The other six House candidates are running for open seats, two with a reasonable chance to flip districts from red to blue.
Just two of the letter-signers are lopsided favorites to win by holding deep blue House seats: Rodney Willett of Richmond and Suhas Subramanyam of the Washington exurbs, who won his primary this summer by running on a democracy reform platform pushed by the cross-partisan group Unite America.
The letter-signers pledged that if elected they would push bills to:
- Establish contribution limits for campaigns in Virginia to dilute the influence of big-money donors.
- Ban corporations from giving money to elected officials in the Statehouse.
- Increase transparency around the original sources of political spending in the state.
- Put before the voters a measure that would turn redistricting of the state over to a nonpartisan commission.
- End policies seen as making it too difficult to vote.
The candidates say these reform initiatives must pass first "to set the stage" for work on other issues, such as gun control, health care, education, climate change and the economy.
"If Virginians do elect a Democratic majority this November, we must heed their call to create a New Virginia Way that works for everyone — not just for big donors and special interests — and to restore trust in our government. It is time for Virginia to lead the nation toward a new birth of democracy and freedom," the letter reads.
Marginal improvements have been made to help voters understand the questions posed to them on the ballot this November, a new study concludes, but such ballot measures still favor the college-educated — who represent a minority of the U.S. population.
This year voters in eight states will decide the fate of a collective 36 such propositions. In a study released Thursday, Ballotpedia assessed how easy it is to comprehend what each proposal would accomplish, concluding that the difficulty level had decreased compared with the referendums decided in the last off-year election of 2017 — but not by much.
In fact, according to a pair of well-established tests, 21 of the 36 ballot measures cannot be understood by the 40 percent of the voting-age population who never attended college.
Colorado has become the second state to ask the Supreme Court to decide if states may legally bind their presidential electors to vote for the candidate who carried their state.
The issue of so-called faithless electors is the latest aspect of an increasingly heated debate about the virtues and flaws of the Electoral College that has blossomed, especially among progressive democracy reform advocates, now that two of the past five presidential winners (Donald Trump in 2016 and George W. Bush in 2000) got to the Oval Office despite losing the national popular vote.