Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Reform in 2021: End Citizens United sees path forward on HR 1

Tiffany Muller

End Citizens United President Tiffany Muller said her group's priority will be advocating for the passage of the sweeping democracy reform legislation HR 1.

End Citizens United

This is the fifth installment of an ongoing Q&A series.

As Democrats take power in Washington, if only tenuously, many democracy reform groups see a potential path toward making the American political system work better. In this installment, Tiffany Muller, president of End Citizens United and and its affiliate Let America Vote, answers our questions about 2020 accomplishments and plans for the year ahead. Her organization takes a progressive approach to money-in-politics and voting rights reform. Muller's responses have been edited for clarity and length.

First, let's briefly recap 2020. What was your biggest triumph last year?

Electing a Democratic trifecta that's committed to comprehensive democracy reform. End Citizens United and Let America Vote made incredible progress toward cementing anti-corruption and voting rights reforms as core elements at the top of the Democratic Party's agenda. Whether it was protecting vulnerable House freshmen, helping to flip the Senate with all five winning Democrats rejecting corporate political action committee money, electing a new president or protecting the right to vote by fighting back against misinformation, I'm proud of our team's work throughout 2020 — all of which was accomplished working from home during a global pandemic!


And your biggest setback?

Losing some fantastic House freshman members who flipped battleground districts in 2018 and were anti-corruption champions in Congress. Those losses hurt, but we're proud of the work we did to support them and what they accomplished in office. Suffice it to say it won't be the last we hear from these incredible leaders anytime soon.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

What is one learning experience you took from 2020?

Voting is our constitutional right as Americans but this past year proved that we can't take it for granted. Our country has long had a dark history of voter suppression — particularly in Black and brown communities — and we saw the attacks on the right to vote in 2020 ramped up in unprecedented ways and carried out by lawmakers, corporations and mega-donors who engaged and funded campaigns that spewed misinformation. In 2021, we're continuing to be vigilant and proactive in the fight to protect the right to vote and counteract these efforts in order to protect the foundational principles of our democracy, especially by working to pass the For the People Act.

Now let's look ahead. What issues will your organization prioritize in 2021?

Our top priority is making sure the For the People Act (HR 1/S 1), a transformational package of anti-corruption, voting and ethics reforms, gets signed into law. And the momentum to pass the For the People Act keeps building. Signing the bill into law would end gerrymandering, make voting easier and more secure, and shine a light on dark money in politics just to name a few of the transformational reforms. Passing HR 1/S 1 would finally allow us to make real progress on critical issues impacting Americans' lives, like accessing affordable health care, lowering the cost of prescription drugs and ending gun violence.

How will Democratic control of the federal government change the ways you work toward your goals?

We're switching gears from fighting back every day against the most corrupt administration in American history and rampant misinformation to working with a Democratic trifecta committed to making sure critical reform legislation like the For the People Act is passed into law. Democracy reform is attainable and prioritized under Democratic leadership, so we're switching our game plan from defense to offense.

What do you think will be your biggest challenge moving forward? And how do you plan to tackle it?

Finding enough Republicans who will support reform legislation. Rooting out corruption resonates with voters across party lines. Americans around the country are fed up with politicians not standing up to special interests and want Congress and statehouses to change that. But most Republicans are either afraid to speak out, or are clearly in the pockets of the special interests that are demanding they rig the system further and further toward their own benefit. Our goal is to prove to Republicans up and down the ballot that there are consequences for opposing these reforms — and that it isn't just the right thing to do, it's smart politics.

Finish this sentence. In two years, American democracy will ...

be stronger than ever thanks to major anti-corruption and democracy reforms like the For the People Act.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less