Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Top progressive reform groups merge to create a $50 million operation

Jason Kander

After losing a Senate race in Missouri, Jason Kander formed Let America Vote. His group is now being absorbed by End Citizens United.

Whitney Curtis/Getty Images

Two of the more influential left-leaning democracy reform organizations are combining forces, forming one of the best-funded political operations aiming to help Democrats committed to voting rights and reducing money's sway over politics.

The merger was announced Thursday by End Citizens United, which will essentially be absorbing Let America Vote.

Since its creation five years ago, End Citizens United has become one of the more aggressive advocates for intensifying campaign finance regulations and promoting congressional and presidential candidates who make a version of "fighting the rigged system" a major campaign cause.


Let America Vote was created in 2017, with the main goal of combating voter suppression, by Jason Kander, a former Missouri secretary of state who has just lost an unexpectedly close Senate challenge to Republican incumbent Roy Blount.

He will not have a formal position in the combined operation, and his organization's super PAC is being shuttered. The combined operation will use both organization names for different purposes and will be run by Tiffany Muller, president of ECU, named for the Supreme Court ruling a decade ago that spawned a surge in unregulated and secretive campaign spending.

"Our groups' missions are intrinsically linked, and our solution must be linked as well," she said in a statement. "We look forward to combining our resources to help elect more reformers and protect the right to vote."

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The combination will yield a campaign budget of $50 million this year.

ECU was one of the biggest outside groups spending to shape the 2018 midterm elections, raising $44 million to spend on behalf of its endorsed candidates for Congress and a handful of ballot initiatives. It claims 4 million members and 600,000 small-dollar donors. LAV's strength has been more in its grassroots organizing operation, which in the last election included more than 1,000 canvassers hoping to turn out the vote and promote progressive candidates.

After the acquisition, the group plans to intensify operations in three states — Arizona, North Carolina, and New Hampshire — that have gone purple in the presidential election and also have competitive Senate and House races on tap.

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less