Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

How the Jan. 6 anniversary and voting rights are tied together

Rioters storm the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021

Protesterss try to push past security at a door of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

From the moment rioters breached the building on Jan. 6, 2021, the attack on the U.S. Capitol has been politicized. Democrats have used it as an anti-Trump rallying cry; Republicans have mostly condemned the rioters while placing blame on the media, the left wing of the nation, and Democratic leaders in Congress.

As the nation prepares to mark the first anniversary of the storming of the Capitol on Thursday, Americans are no closer to unity. And both parties are using the occasion to push their own agenda.

For Democrats, that means one more push to pass the Freedom to Vote Act in the Senate, where it and other election-related legislation remain stymied by Republican filibusters. But Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is expected to put the Freedom to Vote Act on the floor this week, directly tying it to Jan. 6.


Once again, Democrats will fail to find the 10 Republican votes needed to overcome a GOP filibuster and advance the bill. Schumer and the rest of his party know this, but hope the emotions evoked by the anniversary of the insurrection may convince two moderate Democrats to support fundamental changes to Senate rules that would allow the bill to get through the chamber.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Barring a change of heart by Republicans, the only way to pass the voting rights legislation is to change or eliminate the filibuster rule, which allows the minority to prevent the Senate from approving legislation. The filibuster was designed to give a voice to the minority and force the majority to negotiate. But in the 21st century Senate, both parties use it as a blocker, rather than a negotiating tool.

While some Democrats and liberal voting rights advocates want to change the rules, either by eliminating the filibuster or creating a “carve out” for voting rights legislation, their colleagues Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin of West Virginia remain adamantly opposed. Backers of the legislation hope the emotions of the week will spur a change in the Democratic pair’s thinking.

However, Sinema and Manchin are unlikely to be swayed unless more Republicans get on board.

Meanwhile, some members of Congress are focused this week on Capitol security during the riot. The Senate Rules and Administration Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday to review the Capitol Police response, and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has already made that subject a key talking point this week.

“As we have said from the start, the actions of that day were lawless and as wrong as wrong can be. Our Capitol should never be compromised and those who broke the law deserve to face legal repercussions and full accountability,” McCarthy wrote in a letter to House Republicans. “Unfortunately, one year later, the majority party seems no closer to answering the central question of how the Capitol was left so unprepared and what must be done to ensure it never happens again. Instead, they are using it as a partisan political weapon to further divide our country.”

A new CBS News/YouGov poll conducted at the end of December found an overwhelming majority of Americans — 83 percent — disapprove of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, including 76 percent of Republicans. However, they were divided over who was involved, with 41 percent of Republicans saying most of the people who forced their way into the Capitol were left-leaning groups (there’s no evidence of this). Overall, 79 percent of respondents said Trump supporters were responsible.

In a scary sign of times ahead, 62 percent said they expect there will be violence from the losing side in future presidential elections. While under 5 percent of respondents who identify with either party definitely said they would favor such violence, 15 percent of Democrats and 30 percent of Republicans said it “depends.” The issues most likely to justify violence were civil rights (35 percent), gun policies (29 percent) and election results (28 percent).

Polling by The Washington Post and University of Maryland found similar results on the use of violence. One-third of Americans told pollsters in mid-December think it is sometimes justified to take violent action against the government.

The biggest reasons in the poll were: taking away people’s rights (22 percent), the collapse of democracy or a coup (15 percent) and violation of the Constitution by the government (13 percent).

While a majority of Americans remain positive about democracy, that number is dwindling: 54 percent told the Post/Maryland pollsters that they are very or somewhat proud of the way Democracy works in the United States. That number has been in steady decline for the past 20 years. In September 2001, following the 9/11 attacks, that number hit 96 percent and has been dropping ever since.

While the country rallied together around 9/11, it was driven further apart by 1/6.

Read More

majority vs minority
Sanga Park/Getty Images

Make a choice: majoritarian democracy or minority tyranny?

Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

What is more American than majority rule — the principle that 50.1 percent carries the day when decisions affecting all of us are made? The majority wins, and the minority has to accept, even if not graciously, the decision of the greater number. That’s how decisions are made in this country. Right?

Not necessarily!

Keep ReadingShow less
D.C. Police Officer Daniel Hodges shakes hands with Rep. Liz Cheney at a hearing

Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police force shakes hands with then-Rep. Liz Cheney at a July 21, 2022, House committee hearing investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Remembering Jan. 6 with an officer injured in the line of duty

To mark the third anniversary of the attacks on the Capitol, the hosts of the “Politics Is Everything” podcast talked with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, who was beaten by rioters that day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Election challengers in Detroit in 2020

Election challengers demand to observe the counting of absentee ballots in Detroirt in 2020. The room had reached capacity.

Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

It's 2024 and the battle for democracy in the U.S. continues

Merloe provides strategic advice on democracy and elections to U.S. and international organizations. He is a former director of election integrity programs at the nonpartisan National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

The U.S. political environment is suffering from toxic polarization, with election deniers constantly spewing noxious vapors to negate belief in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, the integrity of election administration, and the honorableness of their political opponents. The constant pollution has blinded many from seeing the real state of things and is causing others to close their eyes to avoid the irritation. The resulting diminished public confidence and perhaps participation in elections creates more precarious conditions in 2024 than it faced in 2020 and 2022.

I’ve learned an important lesson from observing elections in more than 50 countries: Even when elections are credible, if a large segment of the population is made to believe otherwise their outcome and the fate of democracy can easily be placed in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that is a central feature of the present electoral circumstance, and concerted action is needed to mitigate that damage and prevent it from worsening.

Keep ReadingShow less
Americans wrapped in a flag

"We must reaffirm the principles under which our country will function," writes Goodrich.

SeventyFour/Getty Images

Together, we can save our democracy

Goodrich is the president and CEO of The Center for Organizational Excellence.

Our democracy is being challenged and, if lost, will impact our way of life in more ways than most may realize. I have given a lot of thought as to why our country’s political environment is in such chaos, facing significant turmoil that challenges our present and our future.

It is important to note that I am truly politically independent. I do not carry the water of any political party and always attempt to consider what is in the best interest of our country. I can have both conservative and liberal tendencies, depending on the issue being addressed, and believe at times each party goes to unhelpful extremes. Occasionally they get it right, but perhaps it’s time to rethink our two-party model.

The foundation of our democracy is the Constitution. I believe it is an imperfect document but provides a strong foundation for the democracy it established. I am in awe that the Founding Fathers thought so much through that it is still applicable today. Every American should read it, and there are “plain language” versions online if it helps. While still strong, it perhaps needs some updating, expanded explanation and more precise language.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

On Jan. 6, 2021, then-President Donald Trump exhorted followers to object to the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

Why 14th Amendment bars Trump from office

Graber is the University System of Maryland Regents Professor of Law at the University of Maryland.

In 2024, former President Donald Trump will face some of his greatest challenges: criminal court cases, primary opponents and constitutional challenges to his eligibility to hold the office of president again. The Colorado Supreme Court has pushed that latter piece to the forefront, ruling on Dec. 19, 2023, that Trump cannot appear on Colorado’s 2024 presidential ballot because of his involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.

Keep ReadingShow less