Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

From Russia with lies: A message to all of us about why to fight for truth

Aftergut, a former federal prosecutor in San Francisco, is co-counsel to Lawyers Defending American Democracy.

Political lies, like the disproven assertion that there was any significant ballot fraud in the 2020 election, are not harmless. Every one of us who believes in civil society must fight them with truth. That is the way to preserve a free and peaceful society.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has starkly shown us that big lies lead to the opposite.


Look back to the start of Putin’s barbarous invasion of Ukraine. Even though Ukraine’s heroic president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, is Jewish, Putin justified the attack as a “military operation” to “de-nazify” a neighboring country.

Russian soldiers clearly believed the lie that helped justify criminal actions. In March, they put a black bag over the head of 33-yea- old Ivan Fedorov, the mayor of the Ukraine city of Melitopol, and kidnapped him. They told him “they wanted to liberate the town from the Nazis.”

The soldiers’ misbelief illustrates the core principle of totalitarian propaganda: The more outrageous the lie, the better for a strongman seeking to make war on enemies domestic and foreign.

As Nazi Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels put it: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. … [T]he truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In Ukraine on April 8, we saw how Big Lies are not only destructive but also become habit-forming. A Russian Tochka-U missile hit the main train station in Kramatorsk, Ukraine, killing more than 50 civilians, including five children, and injuring more than 300 others. The Russians preposterously blamed Ukraine for murdering its own people.

Because Big Lies are essential to totalitarian leaders maintaining domestic power, external enemies are not the only ones who suffer from the state’s mistruths. On April 7, students in the Russian city of Penza turned Irina Gen, their English teacher, into authorities. Speaking about Russian invaders during class, she said: “They wanted to reach Kyiv to overthrow Zelensky. This is a sovereign state.”

She faces 15 years in prison.

Weeks before, in Buryatia, 3,700 miles east of Moscow, someone reported archery coach Valery Yakovlev to police for tearing down a large letter ‘Z’ that had been placed on his school’s entrance. The letter has come to symbolize the Russian war, as tanks and military vehicles invading Ukraine have prominently displayed a “Z.”

Which brings us back to Goebbels. He called it “vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie.”

Attention in America must be paid to these lessons about what comes of attacks on truth. On April 10, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey released a campaign ad titled “Stole,” in which she says: “The fake news, big tech and blue state liberals stole the election from President Trump.”

Importantly, investigations continue to confirm the falsity of Trump’s continuing claims. On April 6, Arizona’s Republican attorney general, Mark Brnovich, released his report on Maricopa County’s election. Though as a Republican Senate candidate he had every incentive to play to the Trump base, he “turned up bupkis.”

The best he could do was say that he found “serious vulnerabilities” in the system. That didn’t cut it for GOP state Sen. Wendy Rogers, who said Republicans “want arrests, not letters and drawn-out investigations.”

There you have it. No matter what the facts show, “lock them up.”

Critically, individuals continue to stand up for truth. Republican Stephen Richer, Maricopa’s elected recorder, quickly rebutted the narrative that there was any factual basis on which to question the vote in Arizona. And on April 5, Princeton historian Julian Zelizer also told us that even Trump admitted the truth when, while speaking to a group of Zelizer’s colleagues months earlier, he spoke the words “when I didn’t win the election.”

One doesn’t need a megaphone to speak one’s truth about the importance of preserving American democracy against the attack on it by lies, small and large. Speaking to neighbors and on social media both matter.

We also have the vote. The November midterms provide each of us with the opportunity to say that we value our freedom and that the truth is vital to it.

Read More

majority vs minority
Sanga Park/Getty Images

Make a choice: majoritarian democracy or minority tyranny?

Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

What is more American than majority rule — the principle that 50.1 percent carries the day when decisions affecting all of us are made? The majority wins, and the minority has to accept, even if not graciously, the decision of the greater number. That’s how decisions are made in this country. Right?

Not necessarily!

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump

Jabin Botsford/Getty Images

Scholars unmask Trump election lawyers’ use of falsified evidence

Rosenfeld is the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

After 2022’s midterm election, I had an email exchange with Robert Beadles, a combative northern Nevada businessman and Donald Trump devotee. His post-2020 hounding of Reno’s top election official had pushed her to resign. Beadles didn’t trust the midterm results either and offered a $50,000 reward to anyone who’d prove that it was not stolen.

Easy money, right? Beadles’ distrust was tribal. But his reward hinged on refuting a statistical analysis that he waved like the flag. His statistician, Edward Solomon, who lived halfway across the country, found mathematical aberrations in the results that he didn’t like. The men claimed that was proof enough that the announced election results were dishonest.

I, and several experienced analysts — a math PhD, a computer scientist, and an election auditor who had spent years studying election systems, voting data, and procedures — tried to explain why the statistics, alone, did not prove anything. We politely told him what records to obtain, why they mattered, what methodologies to use. Beadles didn’t care and soon lashed out.

Keep ReadingShow less
D.C. Police Officer Daniel Hodges shakes hands with Rep. Liz Cheney at a hearing

Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police force shakes hands with then-Rep. Liz Cheney at a July 21, 2022, House committee hearing investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Remembering Jan. 6 with an officer injured in the line of duty

To mark the third anniversary of the attacks on the Capitol, the hosts of the “Politics Is Everything” podcast talked with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, who was beaten by rioters that day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Election challengers in Detroit in 2020

Election challengers demand to observe the counting of absentee ballots in Detroirt in 2020. The room had reached capacity.

Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

It's 2024 and the battle for democracy in the U.S. continues

Merloe provides strategic advice on democracy and elections to U.S. and international organizations. He is a former director of election integrity programs at the nonpartisan National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

The U.S. political environment is suffering from toxic polarization, with election deniers constantly spewing noxious vapors to negate belief in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, the integrity of election administration, and the honorableness of their political opponents. The constant pollution has blinded many from seeing the real state of things and is causing others to close their eyes to avoid the irritation. The resulting diminished public confidence and perhaps participation in elections creates more precarious conditions in 2024 than it faced in 2020 and 2022.

I’ve learned an important lesson from observing elections in more than 50 countries: Even when elections are credible, if a large segment of the population is made to believe otherwise their outcome and the fate of democracy can easily be placed in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that is a central feature of the present electoral circumstance, and concerted action is needed to mitigate that damage and prevent it from worsening.

Keep ReadingShow less