Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Maybe America needs a mom to call a time out

Red and blue fingers pointing at each other
PM Images/Getty Images

Klug served in the House of Representatives from 1991 to 1999. He hosts the political podcast “Lost in the Middle: America’s Political Orphans.”

All of us have had that moment. An innocent comment over coffee with a friend, at a family dinner or while riding an elevator with a coworker. Everyone is at edge over politics. Nerves are rubbed raw. Civility has seemingly vanished.

When asked to rate the level of political division in the country on a scale of 0-100, where 0 is no division and 100 is the edge of a civil war, the mean response is 71, according to the Georgetown University Institute of Public Service. A similar share of Americans tell Pew they worry about political disagreements triggering more violence.


Little noticed on this side of the Atlantic is the reality of what can happen.

In recent years, two members of the British Parliament were killed while on the job. In the fall of 2021 Sir David Armess walked to his office in Leigh-on-Sea, a city of 22,000 in Essex, on the southeast coast of England. Waiting for him was a constituent, Ali Harbi Ali, upset with Middle Eastern politics. Minutes later, the member of Parliament was dead after getting stabbed more than 20 times.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Five years earlier, another member of Parliament, Jo Cox, was murdered on her way to a similar meeting. This time by a right-wing fanatic.

“It used to be the tradition where you could walk up to a member of Parliament and have a chat. Now you would be mental to allow that to happen,” Sir Eric Pickles of the House of Lords told me. “You now want to know who the person is. You want to have an agreed exit plan with your staff, and all that kind of thing.”

After those two tragedies, several British foundations gathered to try to cool the nation’s political temperature. They knew they couldn’t change the zeitgeist overnight, but they could single out leaders as role models who were trying to depolarize rhetoric and drive consensus politics.

“We had quite modest expectations about the effect it would have on behavior change and part of it was just symbolic,” said Ali Goldsworthy, who helped spearhead the creation of the National Civility Award in Politics. “We wanted to honor people who have reached across divides in a very polarized time in the U.K.”

You would be hard-pressed to find a more divisive issue in the U.S. than abortion. But the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union, colloquially known as Brexit, was even more polarizing.

In the end, however, one of the parliamentary leaders of the pro-Brexit movement, Steve Baker, was chosen for the award because of the message he delivered the night his side won.

“I very much regret the division this country has faced,” Baker said. “I very much regret the sorrow of my opponents will feel. I look forward to working with them tomorrow.”

When was the last time you heard an American politician assume that tone?

Now in its third year, the British Civility Award singles out political leaders across the political spectrum. Perhaps we should adopt the idea.

And we have stories of more people trying to change the current political zeitgeist in our “Lost in the Middle” podcast episode “Maybe America needs a mom to call a time-out.”

Maybe America needs a mom to call a big time-out by Scott Klug

Read on Substack

Read More

Flag of Ukraine alongside flag of United States

Flags of Ukraine and the United States

Alex Wong/Getty Images

In swing states, D’s and R’s agree U.S. should continue aid to Ukraine

Amid debates about U.S. international engagement, a new public consultation survey conducted in six swing states by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation found widespread bipartisan support for the United States continuing to provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

Majorities of both Republicans and Democrats support the U.S. upholding the principle of collective security by helping to protect nations that are under attack; continuing to be a member of NATO; and continuing to abide by the longstanding international ban on nuclear testing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ben Klutsey

Our views on the issues haven't changed that much over the past several decades. If anything, we’ve moved a little bit closer to each other. But the way we feel about each other has changed over time," said Ben Klutsey, director of the program on pluralism and civil exchange at the Mercatus Center.

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

‘A truly pluralistic society has both inclusion and dissent’: A conversation with Ben Klutsey

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the sixth in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

The documentary film “Undivide Us” brings together Americans from across the political spectrum for conversations about abortion, immigration, guns and other controversial issues. According to Ben Klutsey, who helped facilitate the conversations, “Participants came in expecting shouting matches, but they ended up exchanging phone numbers and wanting to stay connected because they found each other to be incredibly interesting. People are not as polarized as we think they are when we look at our screens and social media.”

This could also serve as a mission statement for Klutsey, who directs the program on pluralism and civil exchange at the Mercatus Center, a libertarian research center housed at George Mason University. At Mercatus, Klutsey is attempting to build a community of students and scholars who can exchange ideas and coexist with one another peacefully despite their political differences. Klutsey also regularly interviews leading thinkers about liberalism for the online journal Discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less
Andrew Yang

The Forward Party, founded by Andrew Yang, "will greatly increase the overall health of our democracy while helping to put the power back into the hands of voters," writes Copenhaver.

Marco Bello/Getty Images

Identifying division is easy; finding points of agreement is difficult

Copenhaver, a former mayor of Augusta, Ga., hosts “The Changemaker Podcast and is a founding partner of Starts With Us.

Negative campaigning is increasing in volume and nastiness every election cycle. Campaigns are based on a “divide and conquer” strategy, pitting citizens against each other. If you ask most political operatives why this is the case, they’ll tell you it’s because it works. It drives donations, volunteer engagement and turnout. And while I won’t debate that it works, it’s not the only approach that works.

Keep ReadingShow less
Caroline Mehl

"Some of the biggest factors causing polarization today are identity-based issues," said Caroline Mehl. "Issues that touch on identity tend to be the things that are the most difficult to talk about and the things that bring people furthest apart."

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

'We’re in the danger zone': A conversation with Caroline Mehl

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the third in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

College campuses are often depicted as “ivory towers,” purposefully set apart from the rest of the world so that students and faculty can pursue intellectual inquiry in an unfettered way. But of course, colleges are not immune to what happens in the world beyond their gates. This includes the problem of political polarization.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mark Gerzon headshot

Meet the change leaders: Mark Gerzon

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Mark Gerzon, president and founder of Mediators Foundation, has specialized in leadership that bridges divides. His concern about the increasing polarization in America led him to devote the past three decades to working on the ideological frontier between the left and right.

Keep ReadingShow less