Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Ask Joe: Bridging the political divide

Ask Joe: Bridging the political divide

Hi, Joe.

How do you work with people to bridge divides when they really don't want to bridge the divide? I work as a mediator and communication coach and have worked with some clients to help them bridge divides in their families. Often people hold on to their world view and beliefs so tightly and get so defensive they won't consider anything else and are not interested in anything else. It’s been a real pain point for clients of mine.

Thank you,

Bridging Coach


Hey, Coach.

Wow, you must be doing some beautiful work. And so necessary at this time, as the uncertainty and anxiety are only increasing. As a mediator, I’m sure you have powerful tools to help bring people into deeper connection and reconciliation. While the basis of Fierce Civility is getting back to heart connection, the “fierce” part of the work is understanding the difference between fierce compassion and what I call “chronic niceness,” and knowing when and how to use fierceness in a way that doesn’t turn into aggression or harm.

With volatile issues, and when the stakes are high, I usually start the process with the question: “Do you want to see a resolution or reconciliation to this dilemma, even if it means that you may need to (even slightly) adapt or shift your viewpoints or desired outcome?” We don’t move on until we get a “yes” from everyone. This approach works with families, as well as with community groups and organizations.

This one question can take days, even months, to work through until everyone gets to a yes. Fear, trauma, anger and unspoken truths all come to the surface, leading to healing, reconciliation and a deeper empathy for one another. From the perspective of Fierce Civility, peoples’ hearts soften and all parties involved remember what the other means to them if they had a personal relationship. Or if they are members of a school board or community council, new alliances can be made. This allows the parties to move forward and on to the next steps of addressing the issues with more ease. They get a deep embodied knowing of the wisdom we learned from the Rolling Stones: “You can’t always get what you want, but if you try some time, you might just find, you get what you need.” I’m sure you know from your experience that expressing “wants” leads to conflict but, with patience and skill, expressing “needs” leads to connection, understanding and the opportunity for creative solutions that meet the needs of all involved.

But if someone holds on to their “no,” then you as a mediator and coach know you can’t make someone do what they don’t want to do. While this may be tragic for the other parties, the beauty of this is that you have done your part: You were willing to adjust and bridge, and you gave that person the opportunity to step into connection and reconciliation. You allowed them to be accountable for their choices. Their tightness and defensiveness are exposed, as well as their lack of interest in preserving the integrity of the relationships or their concern for the needs of others. And this is when true Fierce Civility is needed.

At this point, the problem is no longer about political issues or vaccines, for instance. When their trauma, anxiety or emotional instability is so extreme that they are no longer concerned about the needs or safety of others, you could consider treating the situation like someone who suffers from an addiction. Think about how families are torn apart by a member who can’t control their alcohol or drug use to the point that they are willing to sacrifice the integrity and peace of a family to hold on to what makes them feel good, despite the possible self-destructive outcomes.

I am not a professional psychologist, but after decades of working with people around the world, I’ve studied and witnessed the effects of trauma on the deepest layers of human behavior. My suggestion is to consider that allowing family members, friends or community members to remain intractable on the issues without holding them accountable is only enabling or reinforcing their attachment, or addiction, to their beliefs. It may be time for an intervention, with both fierceness and compassion.

The question to raise is no longer “how could you possibly believe that?” but “what is going on with you that you are so vehemently attached to what you believe, even at the expense of our relationship?” By appealing to their heart, you may get to a deeper layer of fear, anxiety, pain or feeling of aloneness/powerlessness. If you can get to this point, there may be room for healing and reconciliation. This can transform and empower the existing relationship, leading to a renewed level of love and connection.

These are just some ideas. But I believe what is most needed now in our cripplingly polarized, volatile world is not only for more of us to agree with one another, but for us to truly see and listen to one another. The more of us that find our way back to our hearts, the more we can create deeper, more resilient alliances that can stand strong in the face of the volatility.

Keep on bridging, Coach!

Joe

Ask Joe is dedicated to exploring the best ways to transform tensions and bridge divides. Our resident advice columnist and conflict resolution specialist, Joe Weston, is here to answer your questions in order to resolve tension, polarization, or conflict.

Learn more about Joe Weston and his work here. Make sure to c heck out Joe’s bestselling book Fierce Civility: Transforming our Global Culture from Polarization to Lasting Peace, published March 2023.

To Ask Joe, please submit questions to: AskJoe@Fulcrum.us.

Read More

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

Shoppers stand in line at a Nike outlet store on May 3, 2025 in San Diego, California.

Getty Images, Kevin Carter

How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

In the late 1980s, the Harvard Alcohol Project did just that. By embedding the term designated driver into prime-time television—from Cheers to L.A. Law—they didn’t just coin a phrase. They changed people’s behavior. The campaign was credited with helping reduce alcohol-related traffic fatalities by nearly 30% over the following decade. President George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, along with organizations like Mothers Against Drunk Driving, endorsed the movement, amplifying its reach.

They made sober driving socially admirable, not awkward. And they proved that when language meets culture, norms shift.

Keep ReadingShow less